Bin Lorry crashes in Glasgow

Author
Discussion

jmorgan

36,010 posts

285 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
jogon said:
Sorry for asking some questions but do you normally have a non disclosure order on a traffic accident?
That is what I hear a lot of conspiracy loons say, "just asking questions" and all that. Then they try to disect the peoples lives involved using the power of google and sod all else in the brain department.

Have you asked the police in Glasgow?

greygoose

8,270 posts

196 months

Monday 12th January 2015
quotequote all
jogon said:
Sorry for asking some questions but do you normally have a non disclosure order on a traffic accident?
Probably just a ploy by the lizard men to drive up the price of tin foil, you had better stock up before the black helicopters find you.

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
Vaud said:
No it's false flag. Bin lorry followed by no mention of terrorism. Definitely a govt sponsored operation.
Bin Lorry / Bin Laden

just saying...

williamp

19,267 posts

274 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
You're forgetting the all powerful green movement. Notice how this negative story involves a "bin lorry", rather then an "green eco recycling saving scotland for our children vehicle, or GERSSFOCV" as they are actually known...

Vipers

32,900 posts

229 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
williamp said:
You're forgetting the all powerful green movement. Notice how this negative story involves a "bin lorry", rather then an "green eco recycling saving scotland for our children vehicle, or GERSSFOCV" as they are actually known...
This is "The Daily Record", not the "Times" old chap.




smile

AmiableChimp

3,674 posts

238 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
Was watching World War Z over the weekend, and the start where the traffic is backed up then a huge lorry crashes through everything made me shudder as it was filmed in and around George Square.

Like some kind of horrible premonition.

dxg

8,221 posts

261 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
jogon said:
I like a good conspiracy and this keeps on popping up in the comments section on a few news websites I read.

Name of the driver will never be released according to the news as he was apparently slumped over the wheel after a suspected heart attack but pics as the lorry comes to the end of its rampage shows the driver sat upright..



Happened on the same day as someone suffering from a 'mental illness' drove a car in to a Christmas market in France.
Hmmm. A Private Hire cab in Glasgow. I'm saying nothing.

(Mind you, it's the bus drivers in Glasgow that are the real aholes).

jogon

2,971 posts

159 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Driver been named now it seems and nothing suspicious, so my bad, but nothing wrong with having an open mind.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/home-new...

TheJimi

25,015 posts

244 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
That they kept him in hospital for two weeks is an indication that he had fairly serious health issues, imo


AndrewEH1

4,917 posts

154 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
I'm not impressed that the Herald has released the name of the driver.

mondeoman

11,430 posts

267 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
AndrewEH1 said:
I'm not impressed that the Herald has released the name of the driver.
Why not? Nothing suspicious, there wont be any retribution, its an accident. It'd be in the public domain at the inquests anyway.

DocJock

8,360 posts

241 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
Agreed. Freedom of the press is great until they start exercising poor judgement.

AndrewEH1

4,917 posts

154 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
Why not? Nothing suspicious, there wont be any retribution, its an accident. It'd be in the public domain at the inquests anyway.
Would you want your name to be released if you were the driver? There is no need for the name to be released if it was truly an accident.

bitchstewie

51,447 posts

211 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
Why not? Nothing suspicious, there wont be any retribution, its an accident. It'd be in the public domain at the inquests anyway.
Never did Chris Jefferies any harm did it.

Vaud

50,617 posts

156 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
mondeoman said:
Why not? Nothing suspicious, there wont be any retribution, its an accident. It'd be in the public domain at the inquests anyway.
So wait until the inquest when due process has been completed.

Oh, an an inquest can with hold a name in various circumstances.

Oakey

27,594 posts

217 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
'Harry Clarke' is obviously a stooge working in cahoots with the lizard people

darreni

3,803 posts

271 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
AndrewEH1 said:
I'm not impressed that the Herald has released the name of the driver.
Plus one. Serves no benefit to anyone at this stage, only the press & online aholes who'll dig trough every part of the guys life & harass friends & family for their own ends.



c8bof

368 posts

166 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
darreni said:
Plus one. Serves no benefit to anyone at this stage, only the press & online aholes who'll dig trough every part of the guys life & harass friends & family for their own ends.
The Daily Record seem to have much larger article on him this morning, more than just naming him. Poor guy. I think they should have held off naming him.

GG89

3,527 posts

187 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
mondeoman said:
Why not? Nothing suspicious, there wont be any retribution, its an accident. It'd be in the public domain at the inquests anyway.
Never did Chris Jefferies any harm did it.
What did he do?

HQ2

2,307 posts

138 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
c8bof said:
darreni said:
Plus one. Serves no benefit to anyone at this stage, only the press & online aholes who'll dig trough every part of the guys life & harass friends & family for their own ends.
The Daily Record seem to have much larger article on him this morning, more than just naming him. Poor guy. I think they should have held off naming him.
I agree that it's unnecessary to name him, but there's not much in the article. Trouble is, they're already snooping round his neighbours and we all have probably done something in the past that a tabloid writer could make a 'shocking' headline from.