Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. Vol 3

Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. Vol 3

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

hidetheelephants

23,762 posts

192 months

Monday 27th April 2015
quotequote all
Insanity Magnet said:
My OH is a died in the wool ecoweenie but at least agrees that population growth is an issue.
Dying is a good way of saving the planet. hehe

2013BRM

39,731 posts

283 months

Monday 27th April 2015
quotequote all
dickymint said:
Insanity Magnet said:
2013BRM said:
Ah gotcha, totally agree
A number of green types round here producing more than a pair of kids... My OH is a died in the wool ecoweenie but at least agrees that population growth is an issue. Doesn't like my breeding allowance ideas though... hehe
Whatever you do don't try bio-degradable condoms spin
well, children are bio-degradable too

Ovaltine

58 posts

109 months

Monday 27th April 2015
quotequote all
dickymint said:
Insanity Magnet said:
2013BRM said:
Ah gotcha, totally agree
A number of green types round here producing more than a pair of kids... My OH is a died in the wool ecoweenie but at least agrees that population growth is an issue. Doesn't like my breeding allowance ideas though... hehe
Whatever you do don't try bio-degradable condoms spin
Compulsory viewing for eco-loons with kids, tell them to stop fking in the front hole and sodomy is eco friendly

AreOut

3,658 posts

160 months

Blib

43,793 posts

196 months

Tuesday 28th April 2015
quotequote all

turbobloke

103,742 posts

259 months

Tuesday 28th April 2015
quotequote all
AreOut said:
Some might think such a claim has more to do with being well funded than well founded.

Based on past experience, another 'Prof' will be along soon to claim that the Nepal earthquake has caused global warming.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/03/26/laughable-ag...

Zebedee and others on the Magic Roundabout will soon be out of a job.


turbobloke

103,742 posts

259 months

Tuesday 28th April 2015
quotequote all
Blib said:
No global warming for ~20 years, no eathquakes for ~20 years, it all makes sense.

With all the rampant global warming nuts it's only natural to expect the number of earthquakes to have risen rapidly.



Since then we've seen a cherrypicker's uptick, thinking of 2010-2014 particularly, in quakes M>7 but it's still random.

http://www.livescience.com/46576-more-earthquakes-...

If anything, clusters may reflect one large quake triggering other seismic activity.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

169 months

Tuesday 28th April 2015
quotequote all

Pan Pan Pan

9,777 posts

110 months

Tuesday 28th April 2015
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Insanity Magnet said:
My OH is a died in the wool ecoweenie but at least agrees that population growth is an issue.
Dying is a good way of saving the planet. hehe
As Clive James once put it, Not one of us gets out of here alive, so yes, dying would help a bit, `IF' the numbers arriving on the planet, was matched by those of us leaving it. But currently the global net rate of increase above the extant population, goes between around two hundred and forty thousand, to three hundred and forty six thousand extra new humans per DAY.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

169 months

Tuesday 28th April 2015
quotequote all
Just think of your body as a carbon sink, we need more people, fk to fight climate change!

LongQ

13,864 posts

232 months

Tuesday 28th April 2015
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Just think of your body as a carbon sink, we need more people, fk to fight climate change!
are

Yes but also a lot of water potentially leading to shortages in the relatively arid locations that are projected to be the centres of population increase in the near future.

On the other hand if all of the bodily retained water was liberated would the sea level rise drown Pacific Atolls?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

254 months

Wednesday 29th April 2015
quotequote all
LongQ said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Just think of your body as a carbon sink, we need more people, fk to fight climate change!
are

Yes but also a lot of water potentially leading to shortages in the relatively arid locations that are projected to be the centres of population increase in the near future.

On the other hand if all of the bodily retained water was liberated would the sea level rise drown Pacific Atolls?
You got me worried there for a moment, but I came up with a solution....

Fire fatty Prescott into deep space and leave him there.

Praise be we're saved...hehe

chris watton

22,477 posts

259 months

Wednesday 29th April 2015
quotequote all
I note that some morons are actually stating that the terrible Nepal disaster is due to MMGW/CC!

There really are no depths low enough that these idiots will not sink to?

Edited by chris watton on Wednesday 29th April 13:17

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

169 months

Wednesday 29th April 2015
quotequote all
chris watton said:
I note that some morons are actually stating that the terrible Nepal disaster is due to MMGW/CC!

There really are no depths low enough that these idiots will not sink to?

Edited by chris watton on Wednesday 29th April 13:17
If aliens had invaded it would only be because their long range instruments had managed to pick up our 'increased' heat signature.


Edited by Mr GrimNasty on Wednesday 29th April 13:33

Ali G

3,526 posts

281 months

plunker

542 posts

125 months

Thursday 30th April 2015
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Sauce for the goose!

http://www.thegwpf.com/long-term-global-warming-tr...
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015...

Edited by Mr GrimNasty on Tuesday 28th April 22:24
Those shameless sceptics - fiddling the data to make it conform to their beliefs.

/sauce for the gander

Blib

43,793 posts

196 months

Thursday 30th April 2015
quotequote all
plunker said:
Those shameless sceptics - fiddling the data to make it conform to their beliefs.

/sauce for the gander
You've now completely run out of arguments. You post nothing but snide comments nowadays. You have nothing of value to contribute to this thread any longer.

You're embarrassing yourself and your cause.

Carry on. hehe

turbobloke

103,742 posts

259 months

Thursday 30th April 2015
quotequote all
plunker said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Those shameless sceptics - fiddling the data to make it conform to their beliefs.
hehe

Belief is for faithful believers not scientists. UAH (and RSS) data already failed to conform to the myths of true belief. Nothing changed.

Unlike the already corrupted near-surface data where the faithful have been taking flatlining temperatures or a small cooling trend and lowering earlier decades while raising later decades, which creates and inflates non-existent manmadeup warming.

turbobloke

103,742 posts

259 months

Thursday 30th April 2015
quotequote all
This in essence is what the GWPF inquiry is looking into.



Basically warming = adjustments.

turbobloke

103,742 posts

259 months

Thursday 30th April 2015
quotequote all
Scientific American in spat on misintepretation of climate research.

http://climateaudit.org/2015/04/24/scientific-amer...
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED