Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. Vol 3
Discussion
dickymint said:
Insanity Magnet said:
2013BRM said:
Ah gotcha, totally agree
A number of green types round here producing more than a pair of kids... My OH is a died in the wool ecoweenie but at least agrees that population growth is an issue. Doesn't like my breeding allowance ideas though... dickymint said:
Insanity Magnet said:
2013BRM said:
Ah gotcha, totally agree
A number of green types round here producing more than a pair of kids... My OH is a died in the wool ecoweenie but at least agrees that population growth is an issue. Doesn't like my breeding allowance ideas though... AreOut said:
Nothing new there. Here's this, from 2012.http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/26...
AreOut said:
Some might think such a claim has more to do with being well funded than well founded.Based on past experience, another 'Prof' will be along soon to claim that the Nepal earthquake has caused global warming.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/03/26/laughable-ag...
Zebedee and others on the Magic Roundabout will soon be out of a job.
Blib said:
AreOut said:
Nothing new there. Here's this, from 2012.http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/26...
With all the rampant global warming it's only natural to expect the number of earthquakes to have risen rapidly.
Since then we've seen a cherrypicker's uptick, thinking of 2010-2014 particularly, in quakes M>7 but it's still random.
http://www.livescience.com/46576-more-earthquakes-...
If anything, clusters may reflect one large quake triggering other seismic activity.
Sauce for the goose!
http://www.thegwpf.com/long-term-global-warming-tr...
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015...
http://www.thegwpf.com/long-term-global-warming-tr...
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015...
Edited by Mr GrimNasty on Tuesday 28th April 22:24
hidetheelephants said:
Insanity Magnet said:
My OH is a died in the wool ecoweenie but at least agrees that population growth is an issue.
Dying is a good way of saving the planet. Mr GrimNasty said:
Just think of your body as a carbon sink, we need more people, fk to fight climate change!
are Yes but also a lot of water potentially leading to shortages in the relatively arid locations that are projected to be the centres of population increase in the near future.
On the other hand if all of the bodily retained water was liberated would the sea level rise drown Pacific Atolls?
LongQ said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Just think of your body as a carbon sink, we need more people, fk to fight climate change!
are Yes but also a lot of water potentially leading to shortages in the relatively arid locations that are projected to be the centres of population increase in the near future.
On the other hand if all of the bodily retained water was liberated would the sea level rise drown Pacific Atolls?
Fire fatty Prescott into deep space and leave him there.
Praise be we're saved...
chris watton said:
I note that some morons are actually stating that the terrible Nepal disaster is due to MMGW/CC!
There really are no depths low enough that these idiots will not sink to?
If aliens had invaded it would only be because their long range instruments had managed to pick up our 'increased' heat signature.There really are no depths low enough that these idiots will not sink to?
Edited by chris watton on Wednesday 29th April 13:17
Edited by Mr GrimNasty on Wednesday 29th April 13:33
Mr GrimNasty said:
Sauce for the goose!
http://www.thegwpf.com/long-term-global-warming-tr...
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015...
Those shameless sceptics - fiddling the data to make it conform to their beliefs.http://www.thegwpf.com/long-term-global-warming-tr...
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015...
Edited by Mr GrimNasty on Tuesday 28th April 22:24
/sauce for the gander
plunker said:
Those shameless sceptics - fiddling the data to make it conform to their beliefs.
/sauce for the gander
You've now completely run out of arguments. You post nothing but snide comments nowadays. You have nothing of value to contribute to this thread any longer./sauce for the gander
You're embarrassing yourself and your cause.
Carry on.
plunker said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Those shameless sceptics - fiddling the data to make it conform to their beliefs.Belief is for faithful believers not scientists. UAH (and RSS) data already failed to conform to the myths of true belief. Nothing changed.
Unlike the already corrupted near-surface data where the faithful have been taking flatlining temperatures or a small cooling trend and lowering earlier decades while raising later decades, which creates and inflates non-existent manmadeup warming.
Scientific American in spat on misintepretation of climate research.
http://climateaudit.org/2015/04/24/scientific-amer...
http://climateaudit.org/2015/04/24/scientific-amer...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff