Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. Vol 3
Discussion
Ali G said:
mybrainhurts said:
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology...
If ever there were an apt name, Max Planck is it...
Max PlanckIf ever there were an apt name, Max Planck is it...
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/lau...
Not sure if serious mbh?
t
t.t?mybrainhurts said:
Ali G said:
mybrainhurts said:
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology...
If ever there were an apt name, Max Planck is it...
Max PlanckIf ever there were an apt name, Max Planck is it...
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/lau...
Not sure if serious mbh?
t
t.t?To avoid ambiguity, it is you mbh, that is the 't
t'Not Max Planck.
Do I need to clarify, further?
Or do you wish to s
t on Max Planck - given that I infer that it was his 'name' and not his work that you had an issue with.[/pompous mode off]
t
t!
edited to add sometimes forget the smilies cos i is allegedly autistic (not)
Edited by Ali G on Wednesday 6th May 22:46
Ali G said:
mybrainhurts said:
Ali G said:
mybrainhurts said:
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology...
If ever there were an apt name, Max Planck is it...
Max PlanckIf ever there were an apt name, Max Planck is it...
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/lau...
Not sure if serious mbh?
t
t.t?To avoid ambiguity, it is you mbh, that is the 't
t'Not Max Planck.
Do I need to clarify, further?
Or do you wish to s
t on Max Planck - given that I infer that it was his 'name' and not his work that you had an issue with.[/pompous mode off]
t
t!edited to add sometimes forget the smilies cos i is allegedly autistic (not)
Edited by Ali G on Wednesday 6th May 22:46
PS...the parrot went that way ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
mybrainhurts said:
Thank you for your time and patience, much appreciated.
PS...the parrot went that way ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
And once you get over yourself, normal service will be resumed.PS...the parrot went that way ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
As you were - mbh.
just to break your love story here is a must read for all those fond of "97% scientists agree" claim
http://richardtol.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/now-almos...
http://richardtol.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/now-almos...
AreOut said:
just to break your love story here is a must read for all those fond of "97% scientists agree" claim
http://richardtol.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/now-almos...
Oreskes revisited - and in that sense it's another welcome addition to a long list.http://richardtol.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/now-almos...
Unfortunately the Author's Cut may have cut some not unremarkable detail concerning the Arrhenius paper on carbon dioxide and climate dated 1896, on which he and others based later writing, and the full implications of quantum chemistry for molecular absorption and spectroscopy which emerged later and started to take off with Planck's work published in 1900 and Einstein's in 1905.
LastLight said:
So, not a botch up or a skilled case of fakery and obfuscation at all then!
Not at all The Guardian, bless them, have just discovered STOR. How long has Brooker been going on about this? Although to be fair back then diesel fumes were still on a par with unicorn farts.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
jurbie said:
The Guardian, bless them, have just discovered STOR. How long has Brooker been going on about this? Although to be fair back then diesel fumes were still on a par with unicorn farts.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
The earliest article I can find is 2 years ago, so the Grauniad is quite late to this party.http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
hidetheelephants said:
jurbie said:
The Guardian, bless them, have just discovered STOR. How long has Brooker been going on about this? Although to be fair back then diesel fumes were still on a par with unicorn farts.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
The earliest article I can find is 2 years ago, so the Grauniad is quite late to this party.http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
turbobloke said:
hidetheelephants said:
jurbie said:
The Guardian, bless them, have just discovered STOR. How long has Brooker been going on about this? Although to be fair back then diesel fumes were still on a par with unicorn farts.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
The earliest article I can find is 2 years ago, so the Grauniad is quite late to this party.http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/06...
Blib said:
Anyway, just had a weather chart from VE day 1945 on South Today, 26C in London apparently - how is that possible pre-global warming!!!!!
Should see similar temperatures in the next few days, what's the betting this won't be 'normal' for May anymore according to national BBC news?
Also, some poor old duffer expert on the Antiques Road Show is going to be taken out and shot, in fact, I'm not sure how the segment got broadcast again as it was a repeat - he was talking about how sofa tables came about in the 1780/90s, because global warming is nothing new he said, it got so warm so quickly, everyone was just lounging about!
Mr GrimNasty said:
Also, some poor old duffer expert on the Antiques Road Show is going to be taken out and shot, in fact, I'm not sure how the segment got broadcast again as it was a repeat - he was talking about how sofa tables came about in the 1780/90s, because global warming is nothing new he said, it got so warm so quickly, everyone was just lounging about!
Climate optima...some like it hot (just about everything does)!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff