American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

[eharding]

5ohmustang said:

The actual video is definately not suitable for work, but i'm sure you don't work courtesy of the Soro's group.

Countdown said:

That's twice you've called him Soro. You do realise his name is Soros, don't you?

I suspect that 5ohm (ironic - provides little in the way of resistance) understands that the gentleman in question goes by the name Soros, but that 5ohm is also wildly unqualified to use an apostrophe in an unsupervised environment.

Little surprise then that on the list of PH'ers most likely to blow their own genitals off through negligent discharge of a firearm, he occupies the top three places.

[scherzkeks]

unrepentant said:

Something far more extreme than FOX. Bannon is a white supremacist and so at heart is Trump.

Is he Hitler? Don't tell me you are also one of them.

[Jimbeaux]

Countdown said:

That's twice you've called him Soro. You do realise his name is Soros, don't you?

Yes, we know, Soros...the Dem's version of the Koch Brothers.

[scherzkeks]

rohrl said:

Is Hillary Clinton in worse shape physically than FDR, or JFK?

FDR medical info - http://www.doctorzebra.com/prez/g32.htm

Have a read about the variety of drugs JFK was prescribed while serving as POTUS - http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=125593

Woodrow Wilson had a stroke and his wife ran the country for 2 years. Which really goes to show you how important the actual president is.

[Countdown]

Jimbeaux said:

Countdown said:

That's twice you've called him Soro. You do realise his name is Soros, don't you?

Yes, we know, Soros...the Dem's version of the Koch Brothers.

Why, do they go around assassinating people like 5ohm as well?

[FourWheelDrift]

Voter apathy?

Vote Fridge.

[Jimbeaux]

FourWheelDrift said:

Voter apathy?

Vote Fridge.

Very nice.

[Muntu]

What's going on here then?

[Jimbeaux]

Good to "see" you again Muntu.

[Muntu]

Jimbeaux said:

Good to "see" you again Muntu.

You too mate

[unrepentant]

Muntu said:

What's going on here then?

If you take the trouble to watch the real clip you will see that she was joking about with the reporters. She answered a question and then about six of them asked another at the same time. That was her jokey reaction (slowed down by FOX and co to make it look like something it's not). She then continued to answer their questions. It's a sign of how desperate the right are that they resort to trying to make something of that.

Of far more concern is the history of Alzheimer's in Trump's family. Trump displays a lot of the symptoms of the early stages of the disease - inability to focus, irrational behavior, memory loss, poor judgement, mood swings etc.. They're all there. This is a 70 year man with a family history of Alzheimer's displaying all the traits of someone with the disease. I think the nation needs to know how sick Don really is.

[Art0ir]

I love how the diehards on here accuse the other side of one thing, then display the same thing on the same page.

Goes for both sides. Very entertaining.

On an another note, I would hope by now that people have learned not to take pollsters results as Gospel.

[dudleybloke]

[GCH]

Muntu said:

What's going on here then?

some very poor editing (look at the background)

[Muntu]

GCH said:

Muntu said:

What's going on here then?

some very poor editing (look at the background)

She doesn't look normal on the actual video either: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJjHTeo6mVw

[Muntu]

unrepentant said:

If you take the trouble to watch the real clip you will see that she was joking about with the reporters.

I did. It's weird. Hence the post.

[Jimbeaux]

This is all so insane!

[scherzkeks]

Jimbeaux said:

This is all so insane!

The pic of her handler holding an epi-pen is also interesting, as is the video where he walks on to calm her in the face of animal rights protestors. Pics of her being dragged up the stairs, prism glasses, etc. All quite interesting.

Edited by scherzkeks on Sunday 21st August 21:56

[scherzkeks]

Also pursuant to my comments earlier, a bit of reading for Unrep.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug...




"The economic nationalist argument has also been vigorously pursued by Bernie Sanders, who ran Hillary Clinton extremely close for the Democratic nomination and would probably have won but for more than 700 so-called super-delegates, who were effectively chosen by the Democratic machine and overwhelmingly supported Clinton. As in the case of the Republicans, the Democrats have long supported a neoliberal, pro-globalisation strategy, notwithstanding the concerns of its trade union base. Both the Republicans and the Democrats now find themselves deeply polarised between the pro- and anti-globalisers, an entirely new development not witnessed since the shift towards neoliberalism under Reagan almost 40 years ago."

Not a neolib?

[Jimbeaux]

scherzkeks said:

Also pursuant to my comments earlier, a bit of reading for Unrep.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug...




"The economic nationalist argument has also been vigorously pursued by Bernie Sanders, who ran Hillary Clinton extremely close for the Democratic nomination and would probably have won but for more than 700 so-called super-delegates, who were effectively chosen by the Democratic machine and overwhelmingly supported Clinton. As in the case of the Republicans, the Democrats have long supported a neoliberal, pro-globalisation strategy, notwithstanding the concerns of its trade union base. Both the Republicans and the Democrats now find themselves deeply polarised between the pro- and anti-globalisers, an entirely new development not witnessed since the shift towards neoliberalism under Reagan almost 40 years ago."

Not a neolib?

That is an interesting take on things; thanks for that. The author is correct, regardless of who wins, there giant shift to a new populism evolving throughout the western world.