American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems
Discussion
unrepentant said:
Jimmy Carter is not at all forgotten and is one of the most respected and admired people in the democratic party, a party that represents a majority of Americans.
You defending Carter? Carter was one of the only presidents that asked the American people to ponder a life without hustling. He challenged our core "values." The parallels with the modern Dem party are 0. Meanwhile, Wikileaks keeps pumping out what we all know either consciously or subconsciously.
Modern Dems rig more than just their primaries:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/new-podes...
Modern Dems rig more than just their primaries:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/new-podes...
unrepentant said:
He's already said he does but then he is a total cretin.
hey unrep did you line up for a BJ too?!https://twitter.com/0HOUR1__/status/79031556720704...
unrepentant said:
They believe that she will introduce single payer healthcare system
Hillary Clinton Gets $13 Million From Health Industry, Now Says Single-Payer Will “Never, Ever Come To Pass”http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/hillary-c...
You sure about that? Or has she flip-flopped yet again since that article was published?
Journalism legend Bob Woodward (of Watergate fame) calls the Clinton Foundation "corrupt" and a "scandal."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/watergate...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/watergate...
Close Clinton ally gave $467,500 to wife of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe who was investigating Clinton
http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-ally-aids-camp...
http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-ally-aids-camp...
anonymous said:
[redacted]
of course she has the right to say no, however it's hard to believe she rejected that amount although she maybe wanted more knowing he is a billionairestill can't understand what's wrong with offering her money and why she mentioned it especially because she is who she is
AreOut said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
of course she has the right to say no, however it's hard to believe she rejected that amount although she maybe wanted more knowing he is a billionairestill can't understand what's wrong with offering her money and why she mentioned it especially because she is who she is
Or is it okay to offer any woman money to sleep with you?
scherzkeks said:
Journalism legend Bob Woodward (of Watergate fame) calls the Clinton Foundation "corrupt" and a "scandal."
Legend, perhaps.But he's been guilty of distorting facts for years to sell his stories, so I'm not sure he's an entirely credible source.
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/woodwards_truthine...
hornetrider said:
Esseesse said:
Anyone think the swamp needs to be drained?
Indeed. On balance I'd prefer 'corrupt' to 'you've voted WHO into the White House'.Just.
Dr. Emmett Brown: Alright then, Future Boy, who's president of the United States in 2016?
Marty McFly: Donald Trump.
Dr. Emmett Brown: Donald Trump? The reality TV presenter? Ha! Then who's vice president? Jerry Springer!
230TE said:
Yes, that's probably it. I'm trying very hard to become a Hillary fan so that I'm allowed to participate in this thread, but it's hard work. I spent a bit of time trying (via Democrat-friendly news sources like CBS) to work out what a Hillary presidency would actually do, and I'm none the wiser. "Because it's my turn" is not an adequate reason for wanting to be the President of the most powerful nation on Earth. The figure that comes to mind is Gordon Brown - he wanted to be PM so much that it hurt, but once he got the job he had absolutely no idea what to do with it. I guess Unrep's one true love will try to keep the globalist bandwagon rolling long enough for all the Clintons' friends to cash in and bail out before the wheels come off, so we'll have a few more years of that lovely combination of conspicuously signalled public virtue and rampant private greed that has marked the last twenty or so years. That doesn't really make me want to add a Hillary fridge magnet to my collection, somehow.
All true enough, but what is not the case is that Hillary will be ineffective. She will be very effective but in ways you probably don't agree with.Mass legalisation of illegal immigrants to aid Democrats in the battleground states in future
Appointment of judges who will reliably rule measures to combat illegal immigration and voter fraud "unconstitutional" amongst others.
The problem for the globalists is that it is only racial divide and rule that is keeping the show on the road at the moment. If a future election were to take place in a recession the coalition they have assembled may no longer be sufficient.
Edited by JagLover on Monday 24th October 10:12
Eric Mc said:
hornetrider said:
Esseesse said:
Anyone think the swamp needs to be drained?
Indeed. On balance I'd prefer 'corrupt' to 'you've voted WHO into the White House'.Just.
Dr. Emmett Brown: Alright then, Future Boy, who's president of the United States in 2016?
Marty McFly: Donald Trump.
Dr. Emmett Brown: Donald Trump? The reality TV presenter? Ha! Then who's vice president? Jerry Springer!
What I do find a bit odd is that many who would have whinged mightilly about the types of people who got involved in something like "The Occupy Movement" don't seem to realise that much of Trump's spiel actually covers an awful lot of the same topics they are railing against.
He SEEMS to be anti large corporations.
He SEEMS to be anti-globalist
He SEEMS to almost have a form of socialist attitude to many problems
He SEEMS to advocate government control of capitalist activity in the US (import tariffs, forced job creation/selection, limits on immigration etc)
Frankly, I don't believe a single word of it. He's as fat a cat as has ever lived and a product of the most rampant capitalism you could imagine. He's as much one of "them" as those he claims he wants to restrict.
He SEEMS to be anti large corporations.
He SEEMS to be anti-globalist
He SEEMS to almost have a form of socialist attitude to many problems
He SEEMS to advocate government control of capitalist activity in the US (import tariffs, forced job creation/selection, limits on immigration etc)
Frankly, I don't believe a single word of it. He's as fat a cat as has ever lived and a product of the most rampant capitalism you could imagine. He's as much one of "them" as those he claims he wants to restrict.
rscott said:
So are you saying it's okay to treat her like a prostitute because she works in adult movies?
Or is it okay to offer any woman money to sleep with you?
so if he offers her sex without recording then she treats her like a prostitute but if he says let's record it on camera then she treats her like a princess?! Do you realise how ridiculous is that?!Or is it okay to offer any woman money to sleep with you?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff