American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

[Jimbeaux]

Halb said:

Jimbeaux said:

Your obvious admiration for Warren is not shared by an equal number of Americans. She is far too socialist for much of the population and her remarks thus far have been described as "childish" by many, some Dems included. BTW, the term "Progressive", in its present political context, is arguably a sad misnomer.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 21st July 16:33

Which remarks?

i you see her first appearance together of her and HRC? The famous "both dressed in blue" event? Another one about 4 days ago IIRC. Look up the transcript or check the video.

[unrepentant]

Jimbeaux said:

Halb said:

Jimbeaux said:

Your obvious admiration for Warren is not shared by an equal number of Americans. She is far too socialist for much of the population and her remarks thus far have been described as "childish" by many, some Dems included. BTW, the term "Progressive", in its present political context, is arguably a sad misnomer.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 21st July 16:33

Which remarks?

i you see her first appearance together of her and HRC? The famous "both dressed in blue" event? Another one about 4 days ago IIRC. Look up the transcript or check the video.

Usual empty vessel comments from JimCrow, he makes accusations but don't ask him for specifics, he ain't gone none!

His Clinton "civil war" comments above also meaningless and unsubstantiated drivel.

[Jimbeaux]

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

Halb said:

Jimbeaux said:

Your obvious admiration for Warren is not shared by an equal number of Americans. She is far too socialist for much of the population and her remarks thus far have been described as "childish" by many, some Dems included. BTW, the term "Progressive", in its present political context, is arguably a sad misnomer.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 21st July 16:33

Which remarks?

i you see her first appearance together of her and HRC? The famous "both dressed in blue" event? Another one about 4 days ago IIRC. Look up the transcript or check the video.

Usual empty vessel comments from JimCrow, he makes accusations but don't ask him for specifics, he ain't gone none!

His Clinton "civil war" comments above also meaningless and unsubstantiated drivel.

Drivel? Her stint as the chief diplomat saw her Libyan policies burn that country down. Syrian "moving red line" is basically the catalyst for ISIS. So yes, civil war. I would appreciate if you stop the name calling such as Jim Crow. Those laws, begun by the Democratic party BTW, do not apply to me. I do not direct names or insults toward you and would appreciate the same courtesy. Try hard, you can do it. Thank you so much.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 22 July 00:27

Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 22 July 00:30

[unrepentant]

Jimbeaux said:

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

Halb said:

Jimbeaux said:

Your obvious admiration for Warren is not shared by an equal number of Americans. She is far too socialist for much of the population and her remarks thus far have been described as "childish" by many, some Dems included. BTW, the term "Progressive", in its present political context, is arguably a sad misnomer.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 21st July 16:33

Which remarks?

i you see her first appearance together of her and HRC? The famous "both dressed in blue" event? Another one about 4 days ago IIRC. Look up the transcript or check the video.

Usual empty vessel comments from JimCrow, he makes accusations but don't ask him for specifics, he ain't gone none!

His Clinton "civil war" comments above also meaningless and unsubstantiated drivel.

Drivil? Her stint as the chief diplomat saw her Libyan policies burn that country down. Syrian "moving red line" is basically the catalst for ISIS. So yes, civil war. I would appreciate if you stop the name calling such as Jim Crow. Those laws, begun by the Democratic party BTW, do not apply to me. I do not call you names or insults. Thank you so much.

The catalyst for ISIS was George W Bush and Tony Blair's decision to invade Iraq. The "Red Line" in relation to Syria was a phrase first used by President Obama in August 2012 as Clinton was coming to the end of her term as Sec of State. It was made in reference to the use of chemical weapons and whether you consider it to have become a moveable feast it had little to do with Clinton who was out of office shortly after. Detail the Libyan policies that she instituted that "burned the country down". Bear in mind that the removal of Gaddafi in 2011 was as a result of the Arab Spring uprising and the subsequent military actions in Libya in support of the rebels was carried out by NATO troops acting under the auspices of a UN resolution. So what unilateral action by the secretary of state (who serves at the pleasure of the president) do you attribute to the "Burning down of Libya". Please be precise.

[hidetheelephants]

Trump now 'thinking' aloud about the effective dismantling of NATO. It's gratifying there are GoP types who are not being slow to criticise this.

[jjlynn27]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36854572

Trump gets tiny tiny wall

[Jimbeaux]

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

Halb said:

Jimbeaux said:

Your obvious admiration for Warren is not shared by an equal number of Americans. She is far too socialist for much of the population and her remarks thus far have been described as "childish" by many, some Dems included. BTW, the term "Progressive", in its present political context, is arguably a sad misnomer.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 21st July 16:33

Which remarks?

i you see her first appearance together of her and HRC? The famous "both dressed in blue" event? Another one about 4 days ago IIRC. Look up the transcript or check the video.

Usual empty vessel comments from JimCrow, he makes accusations but don't ask him for specifics, he ain't gone none!

His Clinton "civil war" comments above also meaningless and unsubstantiated drivel.

Drivil? Her stint as the chief diplomat saw her Libyan policies burn that country down. Syrian "moving red line" is basically the catalst for ISIS. So yes, civil war. I would appreciate if you stop the name calling such as Jim Crow. Those laws, begun by the Democratic party BTW, do not apply to me. I do not call you names or insults. Thank you so much.

The catalyst for ISIS was George W Bush and Tony Blair's decision to invade Iraq. The "Red Line" in relation to Syria was a phrase first used by President Obama in August 2012 as Clinton was coming to the end of her term as Sec of State. It was made in reference to the use of chemical weapons and whether you consider it to have become a moveable feast it had little to do with Clinton who was out of office shortly after. Detail the Libyan policies that she instituted that "burned the country down". Bear in mind that the removal of Gaddafi in 2011 was as a result of the Arab Spring uprising and the subsequent military actions in Libya in support of the rebels was carried out by NATO troops acting under the auspices of a UN resolution. So what unilateral action by the secretary of state (who serves at the pleasure of the president) do you attribute to the "Burning down of Libya". Please be precise.

You are incorrect. You know better.

[Digger]

The Onion strikes again.

Lots of rude words. Well, one rude word repeated lots and lots and lots of times.


http://youtu.be/Dg4JGRICQo8

[unrepentant]

Jimbeaux said:

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

Halb said:

Jimbeaux said:

Your obvious admiration for Warren is not shared by an equal number of Americans. She is far too socialist for much of the population and her remarks thus far have been described as "childish" by many, some Dems included. BTW, the term "Progressive", in its present political context, is arguably a sad misnomer.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 21st July 16:33

Which remarks?

i you see her first appearance together of her and HRC? The famous "both dressed in blue" event? Another one about 4 days ago IIRC. Look up the transcript or check the video.

Usual empty vessel comments from JimCrow, he makes accusations but don't ask him for specifics, he ain't gone none!

His Clinton "civil war" comments above also meaningless and unsubstantiated drivel.

Drivil? Her stint as the chief diplomat saw her Libyan policies burn that country down. Syrian "moving red line" is basically the catalst for ISIS. So yes, civil war. I would appreciate if you stop the name calling such as Jim Crow. Those laws, begun by the Democratic party BTW, do not apply to me. I do not call you names or insults. Thank you so much.

The catalyst for ISIS was George W Bush and Tony Blair's decision to invade Iraq. The "Red Line" in relation to Syria was a phrase first used by President Obama in August 2012 as Clinton was coming to the end of her term as Sec of State. It was made in reference to the use of chemical weapons and whether you consider it to have become a moveable feast it had little to do with Clinton who was out of office shortly after. Detail the Libyan policies that she instituted that "burned the country down". Bear in mind that the removal of Gaddafi in 2011 was as a result of the Arab Spring uprising and the subsequent military actions in Libya in support of the rebels was carried out by NATO troops acting under the auspices of a UN resolution. So what unilateral action by the secretary of state (who serves at the pleasure of the president) do you attribute to the "Burning down of Libya". Please be precise.

You are incorrect. You know better.

See, you have no answers, you're an empty vessel. Actually you're pathetic. Put up or shut up.

[Digger]

Nauseating listening to Ivanka. . . . "defend" her father.

[unrepentant]

Trump's speech is literally the worst leaders speech I've ever heard. It's just negative BS, full of lies and half truths and fear. Somebody should have told him that he's supposed to lift the audience, all they've done so far is boo.

[Digger]

You're being ironic and sarcastic right?

They're obviously boo'ing the opposition party / Clinton.

Still vomit-inducing though.

[unrepentant]

Some of the tweets during this travesty of a speech are hilarious. The speech sounds like it was written by and is being delivered by a 12 yr old.

[Digger]

No mention of that wall.

Funny that.

[unrepentant]

Seriously, if you're in the UK watch a recording of this car crash of a speech. It's so bad it beggars belief. Any Americans or people of good faith around the world who may have been scared by the prospect of this moron becoming President will be sleeping a little easier tonight. There are not enough gullible fools in the US to get him close. All he did tonight is firm the resolve of those committed to ensure he never sets foot in the Oval Office and persuade the undecided to cast their vote elsewhere.

[JagLover]

Digger said:

No mention of that wall.

Funny that.

Trump said:

We are going to build a great border wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence, and to stop the drugs from pouring into our communities

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/21/12253426/donald-trump...

There was very little that was new.

Isolationism-lite (compared to pre 1940 America) with a requirement for allies to contribute more to their own security.
Nativism
Protectionism
Anti-elites
Law and order- "Blue lives matter"

Would over 50% of Americans support most of this agenda?, probably, would they support Trump?, more doubtful.

By deliberately tapping into many of these themes the Brexit campaign took 52% of the vote in the referendum campaign, but they weren't lead by a figure as polarising as Trump.

Edited by JagLover on Friday 22 July 07:59

[Countdown]

unrepentant said:

Seriously, if you're in the UK watch a recording of this car crash of a speech. It's so bad it beggars belief. Any Americans or people of good faith around the world who may have been scared by the prospect of this moron becoming President will be sleeping a little easier tonight. There are not enough gullible fools in the US to get him close. All he did tonight is firm the resolve of those committed to ensure he never sets foot in the Oval Office and persuade the undecided to cast their vote elsewhere.

I used to think that but now I'm not so sure. The poll ratings seem quite close so it does seem that there's a substantial number of people who are willing to buy his snake-oil.

[London424]

Countdown said:

unrepentant said:

Seriously, if you're in the UK watch a recording of this car crash of a speech. It's so bad it beggars belief. Any Americans or people of good faith around the world who may have been scared by the prospect of this moron becoming President will be sleeping a little easier tonight. There are not enough gullible fools in the US to get him close. All he did tonight is firm the resolve of those committed to ensure he never sets foot in the Oval Office and persuade the undecided to cast their vote elsewhere.

I used to think that but now I'm not so sure. The poll ratings seem quite close so it does seem that there's a substantial number of people who are willing to buy his snake-oil.

unrepentant, how much money have you put on this? I mean you're very confident so surely it's like printing money.

[mikal83]

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

unrepentant said:

Jimbeaux said:

Halb said:

Jimbeaux said:

Your obvious admiration for Warren is not shared by an equal number of Americans. She is far too socialist for much of the population and her remarks thus far have been described as "childish" by many, some Dems included. BTW, the term "Progressive", in its present political context, is arguably a sad misnomer.

Edited by Jimbeaux on Thursday 21st July 16:33

Which remarks?

i you see her first appearance together of her and HRC? The famous "both dressed in blue" event? Another one about 4 days ago IIRC. Look up the transcript or check the video.

Usual empty vessel comments from JimCrow, he makes accusations but don't ask him for specifics, he ain't gone none!

His Clinton "civil war" comments above also meaningless and unsubstantiated drivel.

Drivil? Her stint as the chief diplomat saw her Libyan policies burn that country down. Syrian "moving red line" is basically the catalst for ISIS. So yes, civil war. I would appreciate if you stop the name calling such as Jim Crow. Those laws, begun by the Democratic party BTW, do not apply to me. I do not call you names or insults. Thank you so much.

The catalyst for ISIS was George W Bush and Tony Blair's decision to invade Iraq. The "Red Line" in relation to Syria was a phrase first used by President Obama in August 2012 as Clinton was coming to the end of her term as Sec of State. It was made in reference to the use of chemical weapons and whether you consider it to have become a moveable feast it had little to do with Clinton who was out of office shortly after. Detail the Libyan policies that she instituted that "burned the country down". Bear in mind that the removal of Gaddafi in 2011 was as a result of the Arab Spring uprising and the subsequent military actions in Libya in support of the rebels was carried out by NATO troops acting under the auspices of a UN resolution. So what unilateral action by the secretary of state (who serves at the pleasure of the president) do you attribute to the "Burning down of Libya". Please be precise.

You are incorrect. You know better.

See, you have no answers, you're an empty vessel. Actually you're pathetic. Put up or shut up.

Jimbo will find something that HRC and Trump share don't you worry......well he'll try.

[Countdown]

Jimbeaux said:

You are incorrect. You know better.

Well, that's me convinced!

When you suggest that being a fraudlent racist bigot is equivalent to somebody who sent dodgy emails it weakens your case substantially i think.

Trump led the Birther movement for how long? And even to this day when he's asked about it he doesn't have the decency to apologise or admit he's wrong. And what he said about Sen. John McCain was just one of many derisible comments. But hey, Hillary sent some email from her private account.

"They're both the same" my left butt cheek!