American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems
Discussion
unrepentant said:
Looks like this thread has been hijacked once again by the uninformed and disinterested cretins from the council estates of Birmingham. I guess it is school holidays across the pond. 
Please inform me on the following when you get chance:
amusingduck said:
unrepentant said:
In any event why shouldn't the DNC work to nominate a candidate who is a member of the party? Sanders was little more than a carpetbagger.
DNC Charter - Article 4 - Section 4 said:
Section 4. The National Chairperson shall serve full time and shall receive such compensation as
may be determined by agreement between the Chairperson and the Democratic National Committee. In
the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee,
particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the
Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and
campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the
Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party
Presidential nominating process.
As you were.may be determined by agreement between the Chairperson and the Democratic National Committee. In
the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee,
particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the
Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and
campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the
Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party
Presidential nominating process.
Then again, the rules don't apply to HRC. Why should they apply to the DNC?
amusingduck said:
Another interesting twist in the Email scandal, where there was "no illegality" as unrep likes to put it.
HRC's punishment for breaking the same laws, but much more severely? Presidency.
article said:
NEW YORK – Judicial Watch’s release this week of 725 pages of State Department emails involving Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin demonstrates the Obama administration considers a large percentage of the emails sent through Clinton’s private server too sensitive for Congress or the American public to read.
Of the 725 pages, more than 250 pages were 100 percent redacted, many with “PAGE DENIED” stamped in bold.
...
On July 7, Charles McCullough, the inspector general of the intelligence community for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, in testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, admitted his office did not have the security clearances required to read the emails transmitted over Clinton’s private email server that Congress was demanding to see.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, generated the response by asking McCullough if he could provide the committee, in a secure format, the classified emails transmitted over Clinton’s private email server.
“I cannot provide a certain segment of them because the agency that owns the information for those emails has limited the distribution on those,” McCullough explained. “They are characterizing them as OrCon, ‘originator control,’ so I can’t give them to even Congress without getting the agency’s permission to provide them.”
“Which agency?” Chaffetz interjected.
“I can’t say that in an open hearing sir,” McCullough replied.
“So you can’t even tell me which agency won’t allow us, as members of Congress, to see something that Hillary Clinton allowed somebody without a security clearance, in a non-protected format to see. That’s correct?” Chaffetz responded, in obvious disbelief.
McCullough responded that he could not tell the committee in an open hearing even what the emails were about, let alone reveal their specific contents.
To contrast this, former Navy machinist Kristian Saucier has been sentenced to a year in prison for taking 6 photos of a submarine's engine room. Of the 725 pages, more than 250 pages were 100 percent redacted, many with “PAGE DENIED” stamped in bold.
...
On July 7, Charles McCullough, the inspector general of the intelligence community for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, in testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, admitted his office did not have the security clearances required to read the emails transmitted over Clinton’s private email server that Congress was demanding to see.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, generated the response by asking McCullough if he could provide the committee, in a secure format, the classified emails transmitted over Clinton’s private email server.
“I cannot provide a certain segment of them because the agency that owns the information for those emails has limited the distribution on those,” McCullough explained. “They are characterizing them as OrCon, ‘originator control,’ so I can’t give them to even Congress without getting the agency’s permission to provide them.”
“Which agency?” Chaffetz interjected.
“I can’t say that in an open hearing sir,” McCullough replied.
“So you can’t even tell me which agency won’t allow us, as members of Congress, to see something that Hillary Clinton allowed somebody without a security clearance, in a non-protected format to see. That’s correct?” Chaffetz responded, in obvious disbelief.
McCullough responded that he could not tell the committee in an open hearing even what the emails were about, let alone reveal their specific contents.
HRC's punishment for breaking the same laws, but much more severely? Presidency.
scherzkeks said:
Jimbeaux said:
What are the odds he turns up "suicided"?
This might interest you:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julian-assang...
However, your post is demonstrative of how much of a possibility it may really be. Thanks.rohrl said:
El Guapo said:
You may believe that HRC is a selfless leader of men, dedicated to the well-being of ordinary Americans & free from any taint upon her character.
Some of us do not.
Can we please leave Hillary's taint out of the discussion?Some of us do not.
But is she even there at all???
The mystery of the amazingly invisible and omnipotent Hillary
Jimbeaux said:
scherzkeks said:
Jimbeaux said:
What are the odds he turns up "suicided"?
This might interest you:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julian-assang...
However, your post is demonstrative of how much of a possibility it may really be. Thanks.Go back to the woods and hug some trees.
Jimbeaux said:
scherzkeks said:
Jimbeaux said:
What are the odds he turns up "suicided"?
This might interest you:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julian-assang...
However, your post is demonstrative of how much of a possibility it may really be. Thanks.FN2TypeR said:
She's awful imo, any half decent opponent would trounce her, luckily (for her) none were forthcoming and she ended up facing off against one of the biggest d
heads on planet earth.
Admittedly she's not great. However she was still far better than some of the loonier GOP candidates. Jeb Bush and Kasich could have beaten her, the rest verged from mildly Loony to Full Trump.heads on planet earth.mikal83 said:
Jimbeaux said:
scherzkeks said:
Jimbeaux said:
What are the odds he turns up "suicided"?
This might interest you:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julian-assang...
However, your post is demonstrative of how much of a possibility it may really be. Thanks.Go back to the woods and hug some trees.
That said, no, I do not like Trump, have said so since the beginning of this thread; I am registered as an Independent. Save your trash talk and name calling for others on here that might bite on it, I won't. ETA: What is even more bizzare, and funny, is this "tree hugging" comment you keep making. What on Earth would have you mistaking me for tree hugger? Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 30th August 19:44
Countdown said:
Jimbeaux said:
scherzkeks said:
Jimbeaux said:
What are the odds he turns up "suicided"?
This might interest you:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julian-assang...
However, your post is demonstrative of how much of a possibility it may really be. Thanks.Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 30th August 19:44
Countdown said:
FN2TypeR said:
She's awful imo, any half decent opponent would trounce her, luckily (for her) none were forthcoming and she ended up facing off against one of the biggest dheads on planet earth.
Admittedly she's not great. However she was still far better than some of the loonier GOP candidates. Jeb Bush and Kasich could have beaten her, the rest verged from mildly Loony to Full Trump.heads on planet earth.Jimbeaux said:
Countdown said:
Jimbeaux said:
scherzkeks said:
Jimbeaux said:
What are the odds he turns up "suicided"?
This might interest you:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julian-assang...
However, your post is demonstrative of how much of a possibility it may really be. Thanks.Edited by Jimbeaux on Tuesday 30th August 19:44
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff