American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

JawKnee

1,140 posts

98 months

Saturday 24th September 2016
quotequote all
Burwood said:
A bit ironic coming from you isn't it.
Please explain.

dudleybloke

19,845 posts

187 months

Saturday 24th September 2016
quotequote all
mikal83 said:
debate TV Monday night/Tuesday morning 2 am. Sky news, BBC news.
Should be entertaining!

paulguitar

23,473 posts

114 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
5ohmustang said:
It will be interesting to see if Killary can stand unsupported for 90min.
What does ‘Killary’ mean? I actually looked this up online and can’t really find a decent explanation.

unrepentant

21,265 posts

257 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
5ohmustang said:
It will be interesting to see if Killary can stand unsupported for 90min.
What does ‘Killary’ mean? I actually looked this up online and can’t really find a decent explanation.
It's used by people of incredibly low intellect to describe Hillary Clinton. Nobody really knows what it means but apparently if you're a dribbling moron it makes sense. 5ohmustang and certain posters from the West Midlands are the only people who can get it. It's a form of autism, but not a good form.

dudleybloke

19,845 posts

187 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all

babatunde

736 posts

191 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
paulguitar said:
5ohmustang said:
It will be interesting to see if Killary can stand unsupported for 90min.
What does ‘Killary’ mean? I actually looked this up online and can’t really find a decent explanation.
It's used by people of incredibly low intellect to describe Hillary Clinton. Nobody really knows what it means but apparently if you're a dribbling moron it makes sense. 5ohmustang and certain posters from the West Midlands are the only people who can get it. It's a form of autism, but not a good form.
laughlaugh
laughlaughlaugh

sirtyro

1,824 posts

199 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
I bet the Hillary camp are nervous about her having a seizure. She hasn't been giving press conferences because of big crowds sending her funny.

paulguitar

23,473 posts

114 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
babatunde said:
unrepentant said:
paulguitar said:
5ohmustang said:
It will be interesting to see if Killary can stand unsupported for 90min.
What does ‘Killary’ mean? I actually looked this up online and can’t really find a decent explanation.
It's used by people of incredibly low intellect to describe Hillary Clinton. Nobody really knows what it means but apparently if you're a dribbling moron it makes sense. 5ohmustang and certain posters from the West Midlands are the only people who can get it. It's a form of autism, but not a good form.
laughlaugh
laughlaughlaugh
Okay, understood. I am no Hillary fan, but calling her ‘Killery’ owing to the 2012 Benghazi attacks is indeed extraordinarily stupid. From now on I will scroll past any posts using that reference, as I do with any posts referring to Lewis hamilton as ‘Lulu’.


It is amazing how this election seems to be bringing out the absolute worst in people. It is actually relatively gentlemanly on this thread, but if one reads comments on youtube and the like, the bile is quite scary.


Muntu

7,635 posts

200 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
‘Lulu’
rofl

Not heard that one before thumbup

amusingduck

9,397 posts

137 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
Lots of people destroy their old cell phones. Not unusual at all and if she did it I'm not in the least bit surprised. If you've spent 30 years having everything you say and write scrutinized by a hostile media and the Republican Party you would be a bit paranoid about privacy too.
All of which is perfectly fine.

Except when it relates to Government (and classified) records.

Unless you're Hillary. In which case the laws and rules relating to the storage, handling, and transmission of Government (and classified) records does not apply to you. Because reasons.

General Patreus (a former CIA director) got into hot water for sharing Top Secret information with his mistress (who also held a Top Secret security clearance) - because she did not have clearance for the specific material he was sharing with her.

Hillary has, factually, given access to classified and TS material to people with no clearance at all (Abedin, IT staff to name a few).

This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some confused

Amazing.

amusingduck

9,397 posts

137 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
sirtyro said:
I bet the Hillary camp are nervous about her having a seizure. She hasn't been giving press conferences because of big crowds sending her funny.
She has some very minor, non-serious health issues; so what?

The Vice President will be able to take over in the rare occasions that she's unable to perform her duties (early in the morning, late at night, when it's over 25C, when shes having a nap, etc)

No biggie.

Vaud

50,571 posts

156 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
Except when it relates to Government (and classified) records.

This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some confused
I would guess that every leader in modern times has shared material with others who were not cleared.

It's why so much intel is scrubbed and anonymised for it's source, ways and means. Intelligence services know that politicians like to talk and share too much.

To clarify, I find it mildly perturbing, I think she was ill advised, but not a material issue.

amusingduck

9,397 posts

137 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
Vaud said:
amusingduck said:
Except when it relates to Government (and classified) records.

This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some confused
I would guess that every leader in modern times has shared material with others who were not cleared.

It's why so much intel is scrubbed and anonymised for it's source, ways and means. Intelligence services know that politicians like to talk and share too much.

To clarify, I find it mildly perturbing, I think she was ill advised, but not a material issue.
They probably do, which is understandable. People are human after all, and humans make mistakes.

That doesn't do her situation justice though.

There is no innocent explanation for her actions. She deliberately avoided Government systems for secrecy. Sorry, in my book, public officials should be publicly accountable. What you find with Hillary is the complete opposite.

Mishandling, Storing, and Transmitting tens of thousands of classified records across non-secure, non-government approved infrastructure. As a direct result of her choices, this information was compromised by foreign intruders. She lied to the FBI, she had information destroyed after receiving a subpoena.

If you, me, or any other normal person attempted anything that was 10% as serious - we'd be spending a very long time in prison.

AreOut

3,658 posts

162 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
https://worldwide.vote/hillary-vs-trump/


so mr. unrepentant what's the conspiracy behind these results wink

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

94 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
laugh I love the way he has been coloured uber orange.

FourWheelDrift

88,546 posts

285 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
Clinton has 80% support in North Korea rofl

rscott

14,762 posts

192 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
AreOut said:
https://worldwide.vote/hillary-vs-trump/


so mr. unrepentant what's the conspiracy behind these results wink
Well they show Iraq & Syria want Trump..

Although not entirely sure we should place too much faith in a random website with all of 30,000 votes on it (and 10% of those are Australia).

AreOut

3,658 posts

162 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
well Internet in Syria is mainly accessible in Assad controlled areas so no wonder they are against democrats, Iraqis also think that democrats are responsible for ISIS so...again no wonder

steveT350C

6,728 posts

162 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
Heard on LBC a couple of hours ago that a professor who has correctly predicted all US President elections since 1984 has predicted Trump. Sorry, don't remember their name

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

94 months

Sunday 25th September 2016
quotequote all
No chance of him winning, IMO.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED