American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems
Discussion
paulguitar said:
5ohmustang said:
It will be interesting to see if Killary can stand unsupported for 90min.
What does ‘Killary’ mean? I actually looked this up online and can’t really find a decent explanation.unrepentant said:
paulguitar said:
5ohmustang said:
It will be interesting to see if Killary can stand unsupported for 90min.
What does ‘Killary’ mean? I actually looked this up online and can’t really find a decent explanation.babatunde said:
unrepentant said:
paulguitar said:
5ohmustang said:
It will be interesting to see if Killary can stand unsupported for 90min.
What does ‘Killary’ mean? I actually looked this up online and can’t really find a decent explanation.It is amazing how this election seems to be bringing out the absolute worst in people. It is actually relatively gentlemanly on this thread, but if one reads comments on youtube and the like, the bile is quite scary.
unrepentant said:
Lots of people destroy their old cell phones. Not unusual at all and if she did it I'm not in the least bit surprised. If you've spent 30 years having everything you say and write scrutinized by a hostile media and the Republican Party you would be a bit paranoid about privacy too.
All of which is perfectly fine.Except when it relates to Government (and classified) records.
Unless you're Hillary. In which case the laws and rules relating to the storage, handling, and transmission of Government (and classified) records does not apply to you. Because reasons.
General Patreus (a former CIA director) got into hot water for sharing Top Secret information with his mistress (who also held a Top Secret security clearance) - because she did not have clearance for the specific material he was sharing with her.
Hillary has, factually, given access to classified and TS material to people with no clearance at all (Abedin, IT staff to name a few).
This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some
Amazing.
sirtyro said:
I bet the Hillary camp are nervous about her having a seizure. She hasn't been giving press conferences because of big crowds sending her funny.
She has some very minor, non-serious health issues; so what?The Vice President will be able to take over in the rare occasions that she's unable to perform her duties (early in the morning, late at night, when it's over 25C, when shes having a nap, etc)
No biggie.
amusingduck said:
Except when it relates to Government (and classified) records.
This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some
I would guess that every leader in modern times has shared material with others who were not cleared.This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some
It's why so much intel is scrubbed and anonymised for it's source, ways and means. Intelligence services know that politicians like to talk and share too much.
To clarify, I find it mildly perturbing, I think she was ill advised, but not a material issue.
Vaud said:
amusingduck said:
Except when it relates to Government (and classified) records.
This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some
I would guess that every leader in modern times has shared material with others who were not cleared.This is, apparently, "not a material issue" to some
It's why so much intel is scrubbed and anonymised for it's source, ways and means. Intelligence services know that politicians like to talk and share too much.
To clarify, I find it mildly perturbing, I think she was ill advised, but not a material issue.
That doesn't do her situation justice though.
There is no innocent explanation for her actions. She deliberately avoided Government systems for secrecy. Sorry, in my book, public officials should be publicly accountable. What you find with Hillary is the complete opposite.
Mishandling, Storing, and Transmitting tens of thousands of classified records across non-secure, non-government approved infrastructure. As a direct result of her choices, this information was compromised by foreign intruders. She lied to the FBI, she had information destroyed after receiving a subpoena.
If you, me, or any other normal person attempted anything that was 10% as serious - we'd be spending a very long time in prison.
https://worldwide.vote/hillary-vs-trump/
so mr. unrepentant what's the conspiracy behind these results
so mr. unrepentant what's the conspiracy behind these results
AreOut said:
https://worldwide.vote/hillary-vs-trump/
so mr. unrepentant what's the conspiracy behind these results
Well they show Iraq & Syria want Trump.. so mr. unrepentant what's the conspiracy behind these results
Although not entirely sure we should place too much faith in a random website with all of 30,000 votes on it (and 10% of those are Australia).
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff