American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems
Discussion
ash73 said:
I don't understand how Amercians can vote for either of these candidates, it's a damning indictment of modern politics.
It's an interesting question how the hell those two are considered the best candidates.For me it's the equivalent of Diane Abbot being voted Labour leader by the Labour Party membership and Grant Shapps being voted Conservative leader and essentially those are the two you're stuck with - horrific
p1stonhead said:
Neither side will ever use them. You seem to assume that Russia is still the good old USSR. They are not. Those in charge and their mates, are as rich as anyone else, living the lives of playboys all over the world with all of the western comforts you can imagine; yachts, planes, penthouses, mansions.
Those in power are beyond wealthy and wont do anything to affect their position.
You are mental.
so you think those in power will just concede to everything USA does and go enjoy their wealth in a mansion while NATO forces enter Moscow?! You don't know Russians at all obv.Those in power are beyond wealthy and wont do anything to affect their position.
You are mental.
Besides communist leaders also had good lives compared to most people on the planet.
Halb said:
Very nice chat about twitter and banning here, between the most excellent Joe Rogan and the most bodacious Louis Theorux
https://youtu.be/uXyS-74sRTE?t=1697
The whole discusion was very enjoyable. Thanks for posting that. https://youtu.be/uXyS-74sRTE?t=1697
ash73 said:
Raygun said:
One (H.Clinton) is a typical politician similar to what we get here in the UK in government and the other one(D.Trump) is unelectable.
Investigative journalist Abby Martin's views on Hillary Clintonhttps://youtu.be/PV_PLCC6jeI
rscott said:
If you watch them for any length of time, it becomes clear that Trump is basically just saying the first words which come into his head. They don't always even make sense..
Watching it now.I think that is accurate for some of the stuff I have seen, but I think he tagged her well on the CLinton Foundation stuff, he was coherent and jabbing well. He does let himself down when he interrupts and gets a lil ranty.
Halb said:
rscott said:
If you watch them for any length of time, it becomes clear that Trump is basically just saying the first words which come into his head. They don't always even make sense..
Watching it now.I think that is accurate for some of the stuff I have seen, but I think he tagged her well on the CLinton Foundation stuff, he was coherent and jabbing well. He does let himself down when he interrupts and gets a lil ranty.
Zod said:
She's a 911 truther, like scherzkeks!
There's even a dating site for them now,lolhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LRf1PalFbA
p1stonhead said:
Trump has just said he will accept the result 'if I win'
fking LOL
The inference has to be that he won't if he loses.fking LOL
So, the only "non-fixed" result is him winning.
Any result where he doesn't win must have, by default, been fixed.
What a poisonous, dislikeable chap he is.
Eric Mc said:
The inference has to be that he won't if he loses.
So, the only "non-fixed" result is him winning.
Any result where he doesn't win must have, by default, been fixed.
What a poisonous, dislikeable chap he is.
what sort of world do we live in when Politics is now so awful that people find themselves pushed towards someone like Trump. He is on any scale a bully and just cannot accept anything other than things going his way.So, the only "non-fixed" result is him winning.
Any result where he doesn't win must have, by default, been fixed.
What a poisonous, dislikeable chap he is.
I don't think the next four years will be good for the US regardless of who wins
Before anyone posts it, the fake news site Baltimore Gazette is back with the claim Clinton had the questions early..
( http://baltimoregazette.com/clinton-campaign-wrote... for anyone who wants a laugh).
Wonder if it's the source for this claim by Trump? http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/20/trump-claims-clinto...
( http://baltimoregazette.com/clinton-campaign-wrote... for anyone who wants a laugh).
Wonder if it's the source for this claim by Trump? http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/20/trump-claims-clinto...
rscott said:
Before anyone posts it, the fake news site Baltimore Gazette is back with the claim Clinton had the questions early..
( http://baltimoregazette.com/clinton-campaign-wrote... for anyone who wants a laugh).
Wonder if it's the source for this claim by Trump? http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/20/trump-claims-clinto...
There is a Wikileak from the Podesta trove showing she did for a different debate. Why should this be different? ( http://baltimoregazette.com/clinton-campaign-wrote... for anyone who wants a laugh).
Wonder if it's the source for this claim by Trump? http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/20/trump-claims-clinto...
I also liked the golden hue they had on her in the split screen.
Early votes in Florida
“Florida is a must-win state for Donald Trump to declare victory on election day and the good news is that he’s off to a very good start.
In fact, his lead in early voting there is a first for Republicans.
http://usadailynews24.com/breaking-early-votes-com...
Interesting but dead people haven't voted yet so not sure what it means
“Florida is a must-win state for Donald Trump to declare victory on election day and the good news is that he’s off to a very good start.
In fact, his lead in early voting there is a first for Republicans.
http://usadailynews24.com/breaking-early-votes-com...
Interesting but dead people haven't voted yet so not sure what it means
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff