American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

[anonymous-user]

AreOut said:

there are hundreds of emails on wikileaks that confirm corruption at the highest level and rigging of primaries + bribing media to accuse Trump and she confirmed their veracity by accusing Russians also she didn't deny her team sent paid protestors to Trump rallies

Take a breath.

Can you just point me to where she "practically admits" that she did or directly authrosed any of these things? Direct quote, clear words please.

Then we'll move on to the "subverting democracy" bit.

[AreOut]

GCH said:

no official yet denied the integrity of wikileaks, they are unfortunately more believable than any govt on this planet

[AreOut]

Greg66 said:

Take a breath.

Can you just point me to where she "practically admits" that she did or directly authrosed any of these things? Direct quote, clear words please.

Then we'll move on to the "subverting democracy" bit.

you do seriously think all that is done without her knowledge?! In that case she is a very very bad leader since her minions do such a serious things and she is even not informed about.

So take your pick.

[anonymous-user]

AreOut said:

you do seriously think all that is done without her knowledge?! In that case she is a very very bad leader since her minions do such a serious things and she is even not informed about.

So take your pick.

Let's try again.

Can you just point me to where she "practically admits" (your words) that she did or directly authrosed any of these things? Direct quote, clear words please.

In your own time.

[eharding]

AreOut said:

minions

Ironic, in that whenever I read yet another of your inane, demented dribblings I invariably think of this chap...

[AreOut]

Greg66 said:

Let's try again.

Can you just point me to where she "practically admits" (your words) that she did or directly authrosed any of these things? Direct quote, clear words please.

In your own time.

she stayed silent when he confronted her with that story, that doesn't tell you anything?!

again, you have two choices...she either actively participated or didn't have a clue what was going on in her own party, there is no 3rd option

[AreOut]

eharding said:

Ironic, in that whenever I read yet another of your inane, demented dribblings I invariably think of this chap...

well I'd like to have so much hair

[Pesty]

Ok you don't like wiki links this look kosher ?

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/04/04/...

6billion goes missing trump brought it up at the last debate Hillary who is an habitual liar said that had been debunked.


Could be a fake site don't know even if it's real will any Hillary supporters care?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/224580.pdf

Edited by Pesty on Thursday 20th October 23:12

[Funkycoldribena]

eharding said:

Ironic, in that whenever I read yet another of your inane, demented dribblings I invariably think of this chap...

Funny,whenever I see your drivel I get this image..

[AreOut]

Pesty said:

Could be a fake site don't know even if it's real will any Hillary supporters care?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/224580.pdf

Edited by Pesty on Thursday 20th October 23:12

the government site has been hacked by Russians and that file clearly planted, Putin is evil just look at that 4 year old toddler in Aleppo

[anonymous-user]

AreOut said:

Greg66 said:

Let's try again.

Can you just point me to where she "practically admits" (your words) that she did or directly authrosed any of these things? Direct quote, clear words please.

In your own time.

she stayed silent when he confronted her with that story, that doesn't tell you anything?!

again, you have two choices...she either actively participated or didn't have a clue what was going on in her own party, there is no 3rd option

Progress. We can forget about the wiki leaks emails. The answer isn't in them.

Now, where is the video of this silence in the face of an accusation? I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I'd just to see for myself what was put to her and her response.

Maybe we should hold off on the conclusions until you've produced some evidence.

[frankenstein12]

AreOut said:

Pesty said:

Could be a fake site don't know even if it's real will any Hillary supporters care?

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/224580.pdf

Edited by Pesty on Thursday 20th October 23:12

the government site has been hacked by Russians and that file clearly planted, Putin is evil just look at that 4 year old toddler in Aleppo

Seriously. What is the point of continuing to argue with Clintons staunchest supporters. You would have more chance of walking on water than getting through to them.

They believe themselves the font of all knowledege and anyone who disagrees or disputes is a monumental idiot to be insulted and ridiculed.

Its fairly standard process for their type.

Stop wasting your time responding to them.

[AreOut]

Greg66 said:

Progress. We can forget about the wiki leaks emails. The answer isn't in them.

Now, where is the video of this silence in the face of an accusation? I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I'd just to see for myself what was put to her and her response.

Maybe we should hold off on the conclusions until you've produced some evidence.

what progress, progress in corruption?!

you can easily find the debate on youtube and see for yourself how she reacted at his accusations

[Some Gump]

AreOut said:

she stayed silent when he confronted her with that story, that doesn't tell you anything?!

again, you have two choices...she either actively participated or didn't have a clue what was going on in her own party, there is no 3rd option

I'm mainly here to poke fun at 5oh, but seriously, your debating technique is as convincing as Trumps "hair".

YOU made the statement that she "practically did x". Now back it up with a citation, or it goes in the Red zone on that truthometer (along with most of Trump's debate material).

First rule of this sort of thing - if it's you making the statement, it's your responsibility to back it up. Claiming silence on a different matter is NOT the same as proving your statement.

Now pony up or accept the other guy has you on this one.

PS - I hate em both, so feel free to throw mud at Hillary, as long as you can back it up I'll not be refuting it!

[scherzkeks]

GCH said:

AreOut said:

there are hundreds of emails on wikileaks that confirm corruption at the highest level and rigging of primaries + bribing media to accuse Trump and she confirmed their veracity by accusing Russians also she didn't deny her team sent paid protestors to Trump rallies

if that's not subverting of democracy then what is?!

imagine if you found the proof that the opposite football team bribed the referee, would you accept the result?!

Feel threatened by Wikileaks much? Understandable.

[anonymous-user]

AreOut said:

what progress, progress in corruption?!

you can easily find the debate on youtube and see for yourself how she reacted at his accusations

How about you find it. It's your claim.

[AreOut]

Some Gump said:

I'm mainly here to poke fun at 5oh, but seriously, your debating technique is as convincing as Trumps "hair".

YOU made the statement that she "practically did x". Now back it up with a citation, or it goes in the Red zone on that truthometer (along with most of Trump's debate material).

First rule of this sort of thing - if it's you making the statement, it's your responsibility to back it up. Claiming silence on a different matter is NOT the same as proving your statement.

Now pony up or accept the other guy has you on this one.

PS - I hate em both, so feel free to throw mud at Hillary, as long as you can back it up I'll not be refuting it!

he mentioned leaked videos in the last debate, nobody from DNC denied their integrity and several high-ranked DNC officials resigned

when he looked at her expecting the answer she stayed silent

so what kind of proof you expect exactly, her to say "yes I admit the elections are rigged"?! Please.

[anonymous-user]

How long do we think Trump will wait before he plays golf with Bill and the rest of the establishment?

Days, weeks, months or years?

[Some Gump]

AreOut said:

he mentioned leaked videos in the last debate, nobody from DNC denied their integrity and several high-ranked DNC officials resigned

when he looked at her expecting the answer she stayed silent

so what kind of proof you expect exactly, her to say "yes I admit the elections are rigged"?! Please.

It's your statement. Back it up or admit you're spouting unsubstantiated / fabricated st.

Your claim "practically admitted". Your proof? A vague mention that someone else mentioned a video you've not linked that she may or may not have seen that she didn't categorically deny on a clip of a debate you can't provide a link to?

fk me, you should have joined the Oxford Union. They'd be in awe.

[AreOut]

Greg66 said:

How about you find it. It's your claim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANT_ZBhpvtw

here it is