American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

[anonymous-user]

rohrl said:

Greg66 said:

Countdown said:

5ohmustang said:

We the people.

https://youtu.be/tqV3e1uI9S8

Alex Jones is a certifiable loon. It's no surprise at all that you seem to agree with him.

Quite. He was the one who claimed he'd heard that HRC and Obama's security detail were scared of them because they smelled of rotting meat and sulphur. Like demons.

People who subscribe to these nut job websites would do well to sit down and read Animal Farm.

I saw that on video once when I was in secondary school, Greg. I really don't think you ought to be recommending it to strangers on the internet.

"Once"?

An obvious lie.

Addict.

[scherzkeks]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21/hillary-d...

It never ends. Questions in advance, and now notes on the podium?

[Countdown]

scherzkeks said:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21/hillary-d...

It never ends. Questions in advance, and now notes on the podium?

I stand to be corrected but wasn't the "Questions in advance" shown to be complete bunkum and the "light" on Hillary's podium looks like a reflection of the studio lights to me.

And by using Zerohedge as a source of evidence I think you're risking being out into the same nutjob pile as 5ohbrainless.

[rscott]

Countdown said:

scherzkeks said:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21/hillary-d...

It never ends. Questions in advance, and now notes on the podium?

I stand to be corrected but wasn't the "Questions in advance" shown to be complete bunkum and the "light" on Hillary's podium looks like a reflection of the studio lights to me.

And by using Zerohedge as a source of evidence I think you're risking being out into the same nutjob pile as 5ohbrainless.

Odd how the screen dims exactly in sync with the rest of the studio lighting.. almost as though it were a reflection.

That video also recycles the notes allegation, which was debunked before. Other footage shows Trump had paper in front of him too.

Claims of this sort of rigging just seem utterly desperate to me and reduce the believability of other claims made - it's the old boy crying wolf story.

[unrepentant]

Countdown said:

scherzkeks said:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21/hillary-d...

It never ends. Questions in advance, and now notes on the podium?

I stand to be corrected but wasn't the "Questions in advance" shown to be complete bunkum and the "light" on Hillary's podium looks like a reflection of the studio lights to me.

And by using Zerohedge as a source of evidence I think you're risking being out into the same nutjob pile as 5ohbrainless.

More hysterical conspiracy theories for the hard of thinking.

Even her biggest enemies would concede that Clinton (a policy wonk) is someone who prepares thoroughly and has a firm grasp of her facts and is an accomplished debater. The idea that she would need outside help to go up against Spunkers in a debate is laughable.

[Countdown]

rscott said:

Claims of this sort of rigging just seem utterly desperate to me and reduce the believability of other claims made - it's the old boy crying wolf story.

Desperate? Desperate? Did you not hear what Michelle Obama said about Hillary in 2008???

Forget all the snide MSM insinuations about "Mr. OctoGrope", for me it's blown the whole election wide open.......

[scherzkeks]

Countdown said:

I stand to be corrected but wasn't the "Questions in advance" shown to be complete bunkum and the "light" on Hillary's podium looks like a reflection of the studio lights to me.

No. Donna Brazile Wikileak.

Studio lights?

[scherzkeks]

unrepentant said:

More hysterical conspiracy theories for the hard of thinking.

Even her biggest enemies would concede that Clinton (a policy wonk) is someone who prepares thoroughly and has a firm grasp of her facts and is an accomplished debater. The idea that she would need outside help to go up against Spunkers in a debate is laughable.

Not IMO. She reads off talking points (literally it appears). Trump is a much more natural speaker and debater.

[Countdown]

scherzkeks said:

Trump is a much more natural speaker and debater.

You are kidding!!! Have you heard some of his answers? He's rambling, incoherent and rarely answers the question being asked.

Trump Book Reports

A monkey with a machine gun

Edited by Countdown on Saturday 22 October 14:17

[scherzkeks]

Countdown said:

You are kidding!!! Have you heard some of his answers? He's rambling, incoherent and rarely answers the question being asked.

Trump Book Reports

A monkey with a machine gun

Edited by Countdown on Saturday 22 October 14:17

I said he is more natural. Hillary was widely disliked in due part to the way she speaks and presents herself.

She is where she is as she has full MM support. No other candidate could have survived being mired in this level of scandal.

BTW, Vox is on par with Breitbart and owned by the Daily KOS guy. Huff needs no comment. Drowing in a sea of propaganda we are.

[Countdown]

scherzkeks said:

I said he is more natural. Hillary was widely disliked in due part to the way she speaks and presents herself.

Agreed that Hillary isn't a natural speaker. Compare and contrast with Michelle Obama. My kids aren't really into Politics and even they were asking why she wasn't running for President. Trump is definitely more flamboyant but that's because lying is second nature and just comes naturally to him. have you seen his scores on the factcheck websites or do you consider them to be propaganda as well?

scherzkeks said:

She is where she is as she has full MM support. No other candidate could have survived being mired in this level of scandal.

Her "scandal" seems to be (to me at least) false and artificial. For example, all the stuff about her being an "enabler" for her husband's behaviour...wtf? But unsurprisingly THAT particular "scandal" disappeared when some of Trump's peccadilloes became public knowledge. And yes, I know that she deleted 33 billion emails but for me it's a "meh..so what". YMMV.

Hillary is quite right wing but at least she's sane. I think that counts for a lot in a US President.

scherzkeks said:

BTW, Vox is on par with Breitbart and owned by the Daily KOS guy. Huff needs no comment. Drowing in a sea of propaganda we are.

But zerohedge is ok?

[anonymous-user]

scherzkeks said:

Trump is a much more natural speaker and debater.

If by 'natural' you mean untutored, unstructured and generally poor, most would agree with you.

[unrepentant]

scherzkeks said:

Not IMO. She reads off talking points (literally it appears). Trump is a much more natural speaker and debater.

Clinton is not a natural orator in the mould of Obama or her husband but she understands cadence and can deliver a reasonable speech. She also has an excellent capacity for retaining facts and figures. Trump is an appalling public speaker, when reading off a prompter he invariably sounds startled, as though he's reading the words for the first time, which he probably is! His speeches off the cuff are disjointed, rambling and incoherent. As a debater he has one style - bullying narcissism. It worked in the primaries but has been exposed as woefully inadequate in the general. He does not have the mental capacity to debate one on one with a disciplined and intelligent opponent.

[rscott]

scherzkeks said:

Countdown said:

I stand to be corrected but wasn't the "Questions in advance" shown to be complete bunkum and the "light" on Hillary's podium looks like a reflection of the studio lights to me.

No. Donna Brazile Wikileak.

Studio lights?

Wikileak related to one question at a different debate though. Not sure what relevance it has to the third debate..

[Funkycoldribena]

scherzkeks said:

I said he is more natural. Hillary was widely disliked in due part to the way she speaks and presents herself.

She is where she is as she has full MM support. No other candidate could have survived being mired in this level of scandal.

BTW, Vox is on par with Breitbart and owned by the Daily KOS guy. Huff needs no comment. Drowing in a sea of propaganda we are.

Ugh..that grin of hers.
Rather listen to Trump any day.

[rscott]

Funkycoldribena said:

scherzkeks said:

I said he is more natural. Hillary was widely disliked in due part to the way she speaks and presents herself.

She is where she is as she has full MM support. No other candidate could have survived being mired in this level of scandal.

BTW, Vox is on par with Breitbart and owned by the Daily KOS guy. Huff needs no comment. Drowing in a sea of propaganda we are.

Ugh..that grin of hers.
Rather listen to Trump any day.

Can't watch him though - those silly little hands waving around all the time.

[smn159]

rscott said:

Can't watch him though - those silly little hands waving around all the time.

It's the stupid gurning that he does that irritates me. Drawing his bouffant topped head back as if deep in intellectual torment before opening his implausibly shaped little mouth and revealing that he's absolutely clueless.

And the sniffing. Is he on drugs?

[Funkycoldribena]

rscott said:

Can't watch him though - those silly little hands waving around all the time.

Can't say I've noticed.
The one thing that does annoy me though is the sniff.

Edit;beaten to it.

[K12beano]

Countdown said:

A monkey with a machine gun

I like that article!

[mikal83]

Funkycoldribena said:

rscott said:

Can't watch him though - those silly little hands waving around all the time.

Can't say I've noticed.
The one thing that does annoy me though is the sniff.

Edit;beaten to it.

But
but my hands are huge believe me I know, they have to be big to grasp my huge cock which is also huge believe me....people ask me all the time, everyones talking about them, believe me, its wondefull, unbelievable..