American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

5ohmustang

2,755 posts

115 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
jsf said:
If its going to pan out the way you suggest, you need to build a log cabin in the Rockies and stock up on things that kill things. Money will be useless. laugh

What the USA needs to do, is spend money on its infrastructure, that will put people back to work and make their economy more competitive. At the same time it needs to figure out how to retrain people in high tech industries as automation takes over. The USA is still a very hands on economy.
Unless you're taking the piss, I already did do all of the above, hahaha. Except when I lived in the Rockies, property was more expensive and securing water rights was difficult unless the property was 35 acres or greater. I moved to the Appalachian mountains due to cheaper property and cabins. When I say cabin I'm not referring to a shack in the woods but a full size log home.

Take a look at https://www.southlandloghomes.com/

I agree with you. Money goes where it's treated well, the government does not treat businesses or money well, hence the reason for overseas outsourcing.

I'll always pay extra for a label that says made in the USA.


Vaud

50,467 posts

155 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
5ohmustang said:
Some nice stuff there... love the cabin style (similar to Swedish/Norwegian builds) - light, airy and needs a big log pile to keep it warm.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

188 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
5ohmustang said:
Nigel Farage is a genius. This man should be primeminister. What a fresh change from the tweed jacketed, elbow patched, Rothschild worshipping, crooked MP.

https://youtu.be/EyL5w7MtrtY
Thanks for posting the link thumbup

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
Love those houses. One of the things I liked about living in the burbs in Georgia was the wooden frame built houses with massive height in the living room and entrance halls, and spending the evening on the deck looking out into the woods, chilling.

Countdown

39,864 posts

196 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
cqueen said:
Countdown said:
Trump's would add $5.3 trillion.
That's assuming Trump makes no changes to the current system.
No. That is the direct result of Trump's proposals. He wants to give rich people like himself very significant tax cuts. What people like 5oh didn't realise is that they'll be picking up the tab. Credit to Trump - he's figured out how to exploit the redneck brigade and have them thanking him for it.

cqueen

2,620 posts

220 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
Countdown said:
No. That is the direct result of Trump's proposals. He wants to give rich people like himself very significant tax cuts. What people like 5oh didn't realise is that they'll be picking up the tab. Credit to Trump - he's figured out how to exploit the redneck brigade and have them thanking him for it.
Trumps point is that he wants to bring back jobs from China etc. manufacturing/retail (especially in the internet age) is a race to the bottom dollar hence everything gets made in china and they gain the (real) wealth. Trump plans massive change to put a stop to that, hence more jobs = more money generated and circulated in the US economy.
5.7 trillion would be assuming he doesnt make any changes. Which he will.

But sure if you want to continue 'as is', then cheer for Hillary.

Halmyre

11,193 posts

139 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
cqueen said:
Countdown said:
No. That is the direct result of Trump's proposals. He wants to give rich people like himself very significant tax cuts. What people like 5oh didn't realise is that they'll be picking up the tab. Credit to Trump - he's figured out how to exploit the redneck brigade and have them thanking him for it.
Trumps point is that he wants to bring back jobs from China etc. manufacturing/retail (especially in the internet age) is a race to the bottom dollar hence everything gets made in china and they gain the (real) wealth. Trump plans massive change to put a stop to that, hence more jobs = more money generated and circulated in the US economy.
5.7 trillion would be assuming he doesnt make any changes. Which he will.

But sure if you want to continue 'as is', then cheer for Hillary.
So Trump thinks that he (or the USA) is bigger than, say, Apple?

Vaud

50,467 posts

155 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
cqueen said:
Trumps point is that he wants to bring back jobs from China etc. manufacturing/retail (especially in the internet age) is a race to the bottom dollar hence everything gets made in china and they gain the (real) wealth. Trump plans massive change to put a stop to that, hence more jobs = more money generated and circulated in the US economy.
5.7 trillion would be assuming he doesnt make any changes. Which he will.

But sure if you want to continue 'as is', then cheer for Hillary.
What is the impact to the cost of a widget by bringing production onshore? Will it be defined as just the production for US consumers, or be for all end consumers ?

It's protectionism. If it is that, then fine... but the impacts will be wide reaching when you operate in a global market. Consumers are willing to pay some premium for Apple. But when against a Samsung or similar, will they pay a significant premium? The US market is big, but the growth markets are not the US for such products.

cqueen

2,620 posts

220 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
So Trump thinks that he (or the USA) is bigger than, say, Apple?
In hectares?

The law is the law and no matter how big or small you are you have to play by the rules. If I'm right, I think you're suggesting that big corporations govern the government - you're right -they do! There is in-lies the problem! (Clinton) This is what Trump has been saying the whole time.

AreOut

3,658 posts

161 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
Countdown said:
It may be worthwhile to have a look at both the candidates fiscal policies.

Hilary's would add $200bn to the national debt.
lol 8 years of obama doubled the debt to 20 trillion and now 4 more years of the same politics will increase it only by 1%?! how gullible you have to be to believe in this really

smn159

12,654 posts

217 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
jsf said:
spending the evening on the deck looking out into the woods, chilling.
Why, what was out there? Axe murderer?

Captain Smerc

3,021 posts

116 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
Countdown said:
No. That is the direct result of Trump's proposals. He wants to give rich people like himself very significant tax cuts. What people like 5oh didn't realise is that they'll be picking up the tab. Credit to Trump - he's figured out how to exploit the redneck brigade and have them thanking him for it.
You know it thumbup

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
rscott said:
scherzkeks said:
Countdown said:
I stand to be corrected but wasn't the "Questions in advance" shown to be complete bunkum and the "light" on Hillary's podium looks like a reflection of the studio lights to me.
No. Donna Brazile Wikileak.

Studio lights? hehe
Wikileak related to one question at a different debate though. Not sure what relevance it has to the third debate..
Think hard.


scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
scherzkeks said:
Not IMO. She reads off talking points (literally it appears). Trump is a much more natural speaker and debater.
rofl

Clinton is not a natural orator in the mould of Obama or her husband but she understands cadence and can deliver a reasonable speech. She also has an excellent capacity for retaining facts and figures. Trump is an appalling public speaker, when reading off a prompter he invariably sounds startled, as though he's reading the words for the first time, which he probably is! His speeches off the cuff are disjointed, rambling and incoherent. As a debater he has one style - bullying narcissism. It worked in the primaries but has been exposed as woefully inadequate in the general. He does not have the mental capacity to debate one on one with a disciplined and intelligent opponent.
When you write long-winded answers full of hyperbole, it suggests you believe the opposite deep down.

Pro tip.

Countdown

39,864 posts

196 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
cqueen said:
Trumps point is that he wants to bring back jobs from China etc. manufacturing/retail (especially in the internet age) is a race to the bottom dollar hence everything gets made in china and they gain the (real) wealth. Trump plans massive change to put a stop to that, hence more jobs = more money generated and circulated in the US economy.
5.7 trillion would be assuming he doesnt make any changes. Which he will.

But sure if you want to continue 'as is', then cheer for Hillary.
The £5.7tn includes any "growth" that Trump's policies might result in. The fact of the matter is that Protectionism restricts growth. This is just one (of many) reasons why Trump's proposals don't stand up to any detailed scrutiny.

To give you an example of his most obvious bull$hit - he thinks he can build the Wall for $8bn and get Mexico to pay for it. Estimates for the wall range from $12bn to $25bn and nobody has explained how or even why Mexico would pay for it. And this is probably one of his more coherent policies.......

unrepentant

21,257 posts

256 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
5ohmustang said:
I'll always pay extra for a label that says made in the USA.

That's not very patriotic. You're from fking Preston! laugh

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

93 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
cqueen said:
Trump isn't perfect, but he's a lot smarter than people give him credit for.

Let's face it folks, the USA is financially f***ked. It requires MASSIVE change to avoid total collapse. Trump represents that change and it is the only chance the US has to pull itself back from the brink.

If Hillary wins? The Western world (as we know it) is over. I give it a couple of years.
rofl

Mans a knobber, I just wanted him to win for the comedy factor until it turned out he was a bit dirty, the Guardian opinion column and response from that boring, racist and rude unrepentant ahole who post in here would have been top draw frankly

Hillary is garbage though, no doubt about it - but worry not, if Fox News ("news") is to believe she'll be dead by Christmas.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 22nd October 2016
quotequote all
I don't know why he ever got involved in running for president, he will be out of pocket, he's disliked everywhere now,he's like the pantomine villain.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 23rd October 2016
quotequote all
smn159 said:
jsf said:
spending the evening on the deck looking out into the woods, chilling.
Why, what was out there? Axe murderer?
laugh

If you knew Georgia, you would say, maybe.

unrepentant

21,257 posts

256 months

Sunday 23rd October 2016
quotequote all
jsf said:
smn159 said:
jsf said:
spending the evening on the deck looking out into the woods, chilling.
Why, what was out there? Axe murderer?
laugh

If you knew Georgia, you would say, maybe.
5ohpreston said:
You've got a purty mouth boy.......
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED