American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

[unrepentant]

Countdown said:

AreOut said:

yeah it's always good comparing someone who gave drugs to young girls and child molester with flamboyant billionaire who occasionally made advances to women that he felt wouldn't mind

"Flamboyant billionaire" who wandered through changing rooms where underage girls were getting undressed?

Let's not forget there is an ongoing case where Trump is accused of having sex with a 13 year old. Given his comments about how much he enjoys ogling naked 15 year olds who would doubt that he is capable of just about anything?

[scherzkeks]

unrepentant said:

Let's not forget there is an ongoing case where Trump is accused of having sex with a 13 year old. Given his comments about how much he enjoys ogling naked 15 year olds who would doubt that he is capable of just about anything?

"A judge recommended on April 29 that “Katie Johnson” should have to pay her own attorneys’ fees and court costs related to the $100 million lawsuit she brought against Trump and billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein over alleged sexual assault charges. Then on May 2, a U.S. District judge ordered the entire lawsuit thrown out."

And refiled in 2016 just in time for the election. Could Hillary (who is married to a proven serial sexual predator and was accused of indimidation and psychological abuse of the victims), have had a hand in this?

Now back to those tits you were so creepily ogling.

[unrepentant]

scherzkeks said:

unrepentant said:

Let's not forget there is an ongoing case where Trump is accused of having sex with a 13 year old. Given his comments about how much he enjoys ogling naked 15 year olds who would doubt that he is capable of just about anything?

"A judge recommended on April 29 that “Katie Johnson” should have to pay her own attorneys’ fees and court costs related to the $100 million lawsuit she brought against Trump and billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein over alleged sexual assault charges. Then on May 2, a U.S. District judge ordered the entire lawsuit thrown out."

And refiled in 2016 just in time for the election. Could Hillary (who is married to a proven serial sexual predator and was accused of indimidation and psychological abuse of the victims), have had a hand in this?

Now back to those tits you were so creepily ogling.

There's a difference between expressing admiration for the superbly displayed cleavage of a 49 year old woman and deliberately entering a changing room hoping that 15 year old girls will be naked.

If you can't see that then, like your little buddy Areout, you have no place in normal society and are a danger to women.

[scherzkeks]

unrepentant said:

scherzkeks said:

unrepentant said:

Let's not forget there is an ongoing case where Trump is accused of having sex with a 13 year old. Given his comments about how much he enjoys ogling naked 15 year olds who would doubt that he is capable of just about anything?

"A judge recommended on April 29 that “Katie Johnson” should have to pay her own attorneys’ fees and court costs related to the $100 million lawsuit she brought against Trump and billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein over alleged sexual assault charges. Then on May 2, a U.S. District judge ordered the entire lawsuit thrown out."

And refiled in 2016 just in time for the election. Could Hillary (who is married to a proven serial sexual predator and was accused of indimidation and psychological abuse of the victims), have had a hand in this?

Now back to those tits you were so creepily ogling.

There's a difference between expressing admiration for the superbly displayed cleavage of a 49 year old woman and deliberately entering a changing room hoping that 15 year old girls will be naked.

If you can't see that then, like your little buddy Areout, you have no place in normal society and are a danger to women.

Tits were the highlight of a charity event for you.

You objectify women. Creepy.

[anonymous-user]

This thread has finally jumped the shark. A political thread where people are now accusing each other of peedling. Not commenting on whether it's right or wrong but come on guys.

[unrepentant]

unrepentant said:

List of right leaning newspapers and their historical endorsements. Interesting. There are now a total of 2 newspapers who have endorsed Trump. You've probably heard of neither.

I didn't realize when I posted this that the only paper on there that has endorsed Spunkers is owned by Sheldon Adelson.

[scherzkeks]

OpulentBob said:

This thread has finally jumped the shark. A political thread where people are now accusing each other of peedling. Not commenting on whether it's right or wrong but come on guys.

I am using his own tactic for comic effect. Clearly some people are taking things a bit too seriously.

Only Unrep and 50 are allowed to do that.

[unrepentant]

scherzkeks said:

OpulentBob said:

This thread has finally jumped the shark. A political thread where people are now accusing each other of peedling. Not commenting on whether it's right or wrong but come on guys.

I am using his own tactic for comic effect. Clearly some people are taking things a bit too seriously.

Only Unrep and 50 are allowed to do that.

No, no. You've clearly demonstrated that you can't tell the difference between a 49 year old woman and a 15 year old girl and like your hero Trump you are in fact a .

ETA

Edited by Big Al. on Monday 24th October 19:18

[AreOut]

unrepentant said:

There's a difference between expressing admiration for the superbly displayed cleavage of a 49 year old woman and deliberately entering a changing room hoping that 15 year old girls will be naked.

If you can't see that then, like your little buddy Areout, you have no place in normal society and are a danger to women.

haha I bet I have more female friends than you, if you have any with such attitude

btw these leaks are hammering your dirty campaign more and more, just go on

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/leaked-cli...

[frankenstein12]

AreOut said:

unrepentant said:

There's a difference between expressing admiration for the superbly displayed cleavage of a 49 year old woman and deliberately entering a changing room hoping that 15 year old girls will be naked.

If you can't see that then, like your little buddy Areout, you have no place in normal society and are a danger to women.

haha I bet I have more female friends than you, if you have any with such attitude

btw these leaks are hammering your dirty campaign more and more, just go on

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/leaked-cli...

Yes but but but its the russians..

Its amazing to see that Clinton really has this sussed. She simply refuses to engage with the press or public at all. She has barely been seen in the last few weeks and it means that for some reason every time a new scandal comes up involving her it just seems to fade into obscurity.

Granted it helps that the MSM barely mention it when something new comes out about Hillary and her corruption etc.

Credit to her for that.

[AreOut]

third project veritas video is up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEQvsK5w-jY

evil empire is crumbling

[unrepentant]

Real Clear Politics just declared Texas a toss-up. Texas.

This comes on the back of the ABC poll yesterday showing Spunkers losing by 12 and the decision of the RNC to start airing ads pleading with voters not to give Clinton a free run by voting down ticket. Meanwhile Clinton is moving beyond Trump and preparing for transition.

[AreOut]

I like how he is just repeating his crazy stories about +12 lead when those are now proven lies and all independent polls have Trump very much in the race, Rasmussen poll has him leading +2, IBD poll that has the best track record over 3 last elections has also him at +2 but hey let's believe that somehow she has +12.

Ridiculous.

[unrepentant]

AreOut said:

I like how he is just repeating his crazy stories about +12 lead when those are now proven lies and all independent polls have Trump very much in the race, Rasmussen poll has him leading +2, IBD poll that has the best track record over 3 last elections has also him at +2 but hey let's believe that somehow she has +12.

Ridiculous.

Rasmussen. LOL. Go to real clear politics. Poll of polls which include discredited Rasmussen and LA Times polls have Clinton at +6.1, also have her ahead in 12 of 14 swing states, Ohio tied, Trump up in Iowa, GOP facing the loss of the senate and large losses in the house. Nobody here expects Trump to even be close, even Conway admitted for the first time that they're losing.

The only people who don't believe it seem to be the hard of thinking few on PH.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.chicagotribune.com/...

https://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/kellyanne-conway-...

[rscott]

AreOut said:

I like how he is just repeating his crazy stories about +12 lead when those are now proven lies and all independent polls have Trump very much in the race, Rasmussen poll has him leading +2, IBD poll that has the best track record over 3 last elections has also him at +2 but hey let's believe that somehow she has +12.

Ridiculous.

Funny how even Trump's own campaign team disagree with you. They've admitted he's behind - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-3774677... .


According to this - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-3745066... - IBD has him equal, not ahead.

[Tony Starks]

The good thing about them Unrep and 50 is the time difference with them being in the US, at least we get a bit of a break from hundreds of links no one reads when they go to sleep.

[Northbloke]

Any links to the IBD polls AreOut? Past history and current standings?

If true I could be tempted to have a bet on Trump at 5/1. This is just so reminiscent of Brexit.

The total reliance on previously failed polls is insane. The News quotes them as if they are fact and the Dems are claiming victory already (Kinnock anyone? All right...).

The timing of the total onslaught on Trump is so transparent and flakey compared to the kid gloves treatment of Clinton. Neutrals can clearly see that and I bet as many are turned off by it as reject Trump because of it. Trump is after the anti-establishment vote and this behaviour just reinforces that.

Is anyone convinced by the (offensive) shrillness of Unrep? ...Thought not.

Still everything to play for I reckon.

[mikal83]

AreOut said:

unrepentant said:

There's a difference between expressing admiration for the superbly displayed cleavage of a 49 year old woman and deliberately entering a changing room hoping that 15 year old girls will be naked.

If you can't see that then, like your little buddy Areout, you have no place in normal society and are a danger to women.

haha I bet I have more female friends than you, if you have any with such attitude

Guess your a good payer? Unlike your idol trump who goes for the freebies.

[Countdown]

AreOut said:

I like how he is just repeating his crazy stories about +12 lead when those are now proven lies and all independent polls have Trump very much in the race, Rasmussen poll has him leading +2, IBD poll that has the best track record over 3 last elections has also him at +2 but hey let's believe that somehow she has +12.

Ridiculous.

Hilary in double digit lead

Hillary leads Trump by 12

Trump complains of phony polls

[mikal83]

Tony Starks said:

The good thing about them Unrep and 50 is the time difference with them being in the US, at least we get a bit of a break from hundreds of links no one reads when they go to sleep.

Ah Your the one that reads 50ccmopeds links.............crikey.