American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems

[Esseesse]

unrepentant said:

Esseesse said:

scherzkeks said:

FN2TypeR said:

Esseesse said:

unrepentant said:

If you want evidence that Trump knows he's lost tomorrow, 2 weeks before the election, he's in DC where he has no chance trying desperately to prop up his latest failing hotel. His brand is now so toxic that he'll be lucky to survive the 7 years Cuban gave him.

Isn't that the place that he talks about that he's just done up? The old post office?

Yep:

https://www.trumphotels.com/washington-dc/old-post...

No idea what he has done to it, but that was one of my favorite buildings in DC when I used to live there.

The main foyer was stunning.

How can it be failing if it's not open yet?

It's already open, struggling badly according to reports.

Ok, I guess it will continue to struggle until the heat of this campaign has worn off. The outcome of the election could have an impact too.

[RedTrident]

What odds will I get on an assassination if he wins?

[unrepentant]

Esseesse said:

unrepentant said:

Esseesse said:

scherzkeks said:

FN2TypeR said:

Esseesse said:

unrepentant said:

If you want evidence that Trump knows he's lost tomorrow, 2 weeks before the election, he's in DC where he has no chance trying desperately to prop up his latest failing hotel. His brand is now so toxic that he'll be lucky to survive the 7 years Cuban gave him.

Isn't that the place that he talks about that he's just done up? The old post office?

Yep:

https://www.trumphotels.com/washington-dc/old-post...

No idea what he has done to it, but that was one of my favorite buildings in DC when I used to live there.

The main foyer was stunning.

How can it be failing if it's not open yet?

It's already open, struggling badly according to reports.

Ok, I guess it will continue to struggle until the heat of this campaign has worn off. The outcome of the election could have an impact too.

Hotel bookers saying companies asking not to stay at Trump hotels.

[schmunk]

More on the Washington hotel:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/10/trump...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jenniferwang/2016/10/2...

[bobbylondonuk]

No one is going to care in 6 months about Trump. the brand is todays story and convenient punching bag. It will take a big hit and after 6 months, it will be back competing like it used to until mid last year.

[powerstroke]

RedTrident said:

What odds will I get on an assassination if he wins?

better than for Clinton I would think

[Eric Mc]

Murph7355 said:

Eric Mc said:

What makes you think they aren't ACTUALLY offended?

Everyone's offended these days. I'm sure they all think they are. But the word increasingly has zero meaning as it's been hijacked...I'm sure I could come up with a whole list of similar words if I put a few seconds' thought into it. "Racist" and "poverty" would definitely be on it.

What did it ever mean?

[frankenstein12]

rscott said:

frankenstein12 said:

Countdown said:

frankenstein12 said:

I really don't see what the last story has to do with anything it wasn't at a rally.

The second story an anti trump supporter attended a trump rally and upset the crowd and along with around 30 other people was ejected from the event. Same has happened at Clinton rallies.


As to the first story it has been completely made up. Video has shown that the "horrid" man who punched the old lady was in fact a legally blind 73 year old man. It also shows that she walked up behind him and grabbed his shoulder pulling him round slightly. What you don't see is evidence of him actually punching her as claimed.

The original question was about violence against women by Trump supporters. Nothing at all to do with whether it WAS at a rally or whether it WASN'T at a rally. And, wrt to the first link, has been pointed out already there are several sources stating that it DID happen. None as credible as Breitbart though....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNR9FUN98Qg

So she said it might have been a backhanded blow to the face rather than a punch. Not that the whole incident was made up.

If you watch the footage you will see she rapidly marches up behind him, reaches out and "appears" to pull his right shoulder round.

Bear in mind it seems she was part of the DNC and sent to cause an incident and that she started back-pedaling on her story after repeatedly stating he had beyond doubt punched her in the face after it came out he is legally blind.

Watch the footage you will see him walk into a plastic reflective post while being led the hand by his wife.

[Trabi601]

Funkycoldribena said:

Just breathe and let it go.
The worlds changing for the better,just embrace that people have had enough of the same old politicians blathering out the same old time and time again.
The quicker you,Cleggy,Geldof,Izzard etc accept it and move on the easier it'll be.

Because what the world needs is a sexist, racist, xenophobic, idiot with an IQ lower than his shoes size, in control of a world superpower.

[Halb]

bobbylondonuk said:

No one is going to care in 6 months about Trump. the brand is todays story and convenient punching bag. It will take a big hit and after 6 months, it will be back competing like it used to until mid last year.

Trump TV should be fun.

[rscott]

frankenstein12 said:

rscott said:

frankenstein12 said:

Countdown said:

frankenstein12 said:

I really don't see what the last story has to do with anything it wasn't at a rally.

The second story an anti trump supporter attended a trump rally and upset the crowd and along with around 30 other people was ejected from the event. Same has happened at Clinton rallies.


As to the first story it has been completely made up. Video has shown that the "horrid" man who punched the old lady was in fact a legally blind 73 year old man. It also shows that she walked up behind him and grabbed his shoulder pulling him round slightly. What you don't see is evidence of him actually punching her as claimed.

The original question was about violence against women by Trump supporters. Nothing at all to do with whether it WAS at a rally or whether it WASN'T at a rally. And, wrt to the first link, has been pointed out already there are several sources stating that it DID happen. None as credible as Breitbart though....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNR9FUN98Qg

So she said it might have been a backhanded blow to the face rather than a punch. Not that the whole incident was made up.

If you watch the footage you will see she rapidly marches up behind him, reaches out and "appears" to pull his right shoulder round.

Bear in mind it seems she was part of the DNC and sent to cause an incident and that she started back-pedaling on her story after repeatedly stating he had beyond doubt punched her in the face after it came out he is legally blind.

Watch the footage you will see him walk into a plastic reflective post while being led the hand by his wife.

He walked into the post because he wasn't even looking in the direction of it - he was starting at the placards being held up.

Yes, she walked up behind him and reached out, but we simply don't see the actual contact between them.

[bobbylondonuk]

Halb said:

bobbylondonuk said:

No one is going to care in 6 months about Trump. the brand is todays story and convenient punching bag. It will take a big hit and after 6 months, it will be back competing like it used to until mid last year.

Trump TV should be fun.

Yep, If I cant win, I will make your life miserable day in day out. If I win, I will be worshipped.

Brilliant move either way!

[5ohmustang]

She lives.


A true testament to these times.
https://youtu.be/iJC4R1uXDaE

Edited by 5ohmustang on Wednesday 26th October 16:53

[smn159]

5ohmustang said:

She lives.

Ah, you're one of those people are you?

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2016/10/10/trum...

[5ohmustang]

I'm with her.

[smn159]

Dog Star said:

I am absolutely praying that he wins; it will be fking brilliant! I don't give a crap who wins but the wailing and ranting on FB and Tw@tter is going to be extraordinary if Trump wins. It'll be the same right-on wailers who were shouting down all the "thick" "selfish" "racist" Tories/Brexitters - if they get it wrong again they'll go into meltdown.

So you want Trump to win so you can score some Facebook points?

Your thread is this way
|
|
\/

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

[Funkycoldribena]

Trabi601 said:

Because what the world needs is a sexist, racist, xenophobic, idiot with an IQ lower than his shoes size, in control of a world superpower.

Bingo! Full house.
You really don't get it,do you?

[smn159]

Funkycoldribena said:

Bingo! Full house.
You really don't get it,do you?

Sexist, racist xenophobes have feelings too?

[mikal83]

smn159 said:

5ohmustang said:

She lives.

Ah, you're one of those people are you?

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2016/10/10/trum...


[/quote

yessir that'll be me sir. yesindeedy.

[anonymous-user]

smn159 said:

Dog Star said:

I am absolutely praying that he wins; it will be fking brilliant! I don't give a crap who wins but the wailing and ranting on FB and Tw@tter is going to be extraordinary if Trump wins. It'll be the same right-on wailers who were shouting down all the "thick" "selfish" "racist" Tories/Brexitters - if they get it wrong again they'll go into meltdown.

So you want Trump to win so you can score some Facebook points?

Your thread is this way
|
|
\/

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

I don't think I'm doing DS a disservice when I say he's already all over it

(as am I)