American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems
Discussion
Some Gump said:
Why do trumpeteers think that really disliking him and liking Clinton is one and the same?
As South PArk so eloquently puts it, you've got the choice of a giant douche and a turd sandwich. Picking the lesser of to evils is not the same as supporting / liking / defending Clinton.
I've never said that. I will write in Nader (though I am considering Stein).As South PArk so eloquently puts it, you've got the choice of a giant douche and a turd sandwich. Picking the lesser of to evils is not the same as supporting / liking / defending Clinton.
That quote is also almost exactly what I have said several times in this thread, only I used s
t sandwich. 
5ohmustang said:
Snopes, a cat woman and her husband in an apartment, a brilliant unbiased source.
I guess you did'nt get the memo.
The whole point of the cat woman stereotype is that she doesn't have a husband. You'd know that if you interacted with real people, instead of hiding away, ready to shoot them if they come too close to your tinned food.I guess you did'nt get the memo.
Zod said:
5ohmustang said:
Snopes, a cat woman and her husband in an apartment, a brilliant unbiased source.
I guess you did'nt get the memo.
The whole point of the cat woman stereotype is that she doesn't have a husband. You'd know that if you interacted with real people, instead of hiding away, ready to shoot them if they come too close to your tinned food.I guess you did'nt get the memo.
"Preston come quick. There's a car in them woods. And it 'aint the bail bondsman or the debt collectors like before. They're comin' for err spam I tell ya".
scherzkeks said:
I've never said that. I will write in Nader (though I am considering Stein).
That quote is also almost exactly what I have said several times in this thread, only I used st sandwich.
Apologies, with all the circular debate I've obviously mixed 2 people up then =)That quote is also almost exactly what I have said several times in this thread, only I used s
t sandwich. But for the record, it is turd sandwich. =)
NYT said:
When Trump found out Ivana, his future wife, was a better skier: "Donald was so angry, he took off his skis, his ski boots, and walked up to the restaurant"
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/26/us/politics/donald-trump-interviews.html?mtrref=www.mediaite.com&gwh=859BE724D5DD83DB9ED0FE4604A23237&gwt=pay&_r=0What a mental image
unrepentant said:
"Preston come quick. There's a car in them woods. And it 'aint the bail bondsman or the debt collectors like before. They're comin' for err spam I tell ya".
This is usually the case with libtards.
5ohmustang said:
unrepentant said:
"Preston come quick. There's a car in them woods. And it 'aint the bail bondsman or the debt collectors like before. They're comin' for err spam I tell ya".
This is usually the case with libtards.
5ohmustang said:
unrepentant said:
"Preston come quick. There's a car in them woods. And it 'aint the bail bondsman or the debt collectors like before. They're comin' for err spam I tell ya".
This is usually the case with libtards.
unrepentant said:
5ohmustang said:
unrepentant said:
"Preston come quick. There's a car in them woods. And it 'aint the bail bondsman or the debt collectors like before. They're comin' for err spam I tell ya".
This is usually the case with libtards.
Halb said:
My wife is from Texas, and whilst she spent her life between 21 and 30 in cosmopolitan Dallas we still go to south Texas and spend time about 90 miles from the Mexican boarder where she grew up. It's genuinely bewildering and unless you see it it's hard to get your head around, and then even harder to get your head around it when you do see it. Absolutely nothing would surprise me if I was told it happened in Texas.As for the election itself I think America is in an awful predicament. Hillary Clinton is beyond vile, she's awful and if they'd managed to get just a half decent opponent they would have washed her away. I'd personally still vote Trump, not because I think he's special, but because I think he has the inability to get anything done, and 4 years of doing nothing in America I feel are better than Clinton who knows the ropes.
Halb said:
What a level headed and unbiased site!I love their maths, where somehow a poll showing 26% in favour of something increases to 40% with no citation..
Petrus1983 said:
My wife is from Texas, and whilst she spent her life between 21 and 30 in cosmopolitan Dallas we still go to south Texas and spend time about 90 miles from the Mexican boarder where she grew up. It's genuinely bewildering and unless you see it it's hard to get your head around, and then even harder to get your head around it when you do see it. Absolutely nothing would surprise me if I was told it happened in Texas.
As for the election itself I think America is in an awful predicament. Hillary Clinton is beyond vile, she's awful and if they'd managed to get just a half decent opponent they would have washed her away. I'd personally still vote Trump, not because I think he's special, but because I think he has the inability to get anything done, and 4 years of doing nothing in America I feel are better than Clinton who knows the ropes.
The only advantages Trump has are that he is an unknown quantity, and he could potentially do some good in ending our perpetual wars and working to reverse some of the damage done via NAFTA. I also think he is pretty safe on social issues, but you never know.As for the election itself I think America is in an awful predicament. Hillary Clinton is beyond vile, she's awful and if they'd managed to get just a half decent opponent they would have washed her away. I'd personally still vote Trump, not because I think he's special, but because I think he has the inability to get anything done, and 4 years of doing nothing in America I feel are better than Clinton who knows the ropes.
That said, the former issues above are nearly impossible for a president to tackle in this day, I suspect, given the collusion of powerful interest groups influencing the system. Campaign finance changes did us in. No question we are circling the drain, but it is hard to say exactly when it's all going to blow up. I have no doubht Clinton will accellerate the process though.
Petrus1983 said:
That lady genuinely scares the bejeezers out of me, something just doesn't sit right with her, and that's before you think of the decades of corruption associated to her.
Whatever do you mean?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ
DELETED: Comment made by a member who's account has been deleted.
And yet that's exactly what we get on this side of the pond from so-called left-liberals, as they like to tell everyone to do as they say not as they do, with all sorts of p-c lifestyle coercion going on as well. It'd be more accurate to use the term illiberals. A similar situation may exist stateside. How liberals become illiberal:
http://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/columnists/think...
Liberals and the Illiberal left:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/0...
Why liberalism is so illiberal:
http://www.crisismagazine.com/2014/illiberal-liber...
HRClinton: 'we'll take things from you for the common good' (words close enough): well no thanks, you don't know best how to spend other people's money, a bit of liberal live and let live / earn and let spend would be much more...liberal.
SystemParanoia said:
Better than i thought was gonna be lol turbobloke said:
Nanook said:
5OhmMancboy, what exactly is wrong with being liberal?
You keep using this word libtard, to try and put down people with liberal views, but why?
What's wrong with being open minded, accepting of other people's views, live and let live?
Is that not the particular brand of freedom you like? Do you like the sort of freedom where everyone has to comply with your point of view?
Because that's not really freedom you know...
And yet that's exactly what we get on this side of the pond from so-called left-liberals, as they like to tell everyone to do as they say not as they do, with all sorts of p-c lifestyle coercion going on as well. It'd be more accurate to use the term illiberals. A similar situation may exist stateside. You keep using this word libtard, to try and put down people with liberal views, but why?
What's wrong with being open minded, accepting of other people's views, live and let live?
Is that not the particular brand of freedom you like? Do you like the sort of freedom where everyone has to comply with your point of view?
Because that's not really freedom you know...
How liberals become illiberal:
http://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/columnists/think...
Liberals and the Illiberal left:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/0...
Why liberalism is so illiberal:
http://www.crisismagazine.com/2014/illiberal-liber...
HRClinton: we'll take things from you for the common good (well no thanks, you don't know best how to spend other people's money, a bit of liberal live and let live / earn and let spend would be much more...liberal.
Apparently when 'Social Liberalism' took hold of the Liberal party, as you would expect the hard line Classical Liberals felt betrayed, as if the new types of Liberals were sell-outs.
It seems to me that at any one time in a country there can only be one dominant ideology, and at the beginning of the 20th century Socialism took over from Classical Liberalism. Conservatism isn't an ideology, just a brake on the dominant ideology of the time which is why so many 'hard line conservatives' are, and will always be disappointed with the UK Conservative party.
Edited by Esseesse on Thursday 27th October 16:46
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff