American Presidential candidates GoP/Dems
Discussion
amusingduck said:
CNN drops Donna Brazile after Wikileaks reveals her feeding debate questions to HRC
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/cnn...
I love that after the DNC leaks, where Chairwoman Debbie Wassermann Schultz and other key members resigned, Donna was appointed interim Chair of the DNC. She, unsurprisingly, is more of the same, and gets dropped by CNN
Wow. Firstly that was reported on this very thread yesterday as news. Secondly Brazile resigned from CNN two weeks ago, as was also pointed out on this thread yesterday. So not even news yesterday when it was first bought up here. Definitely not news now.https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/cnn...
I love that after the DNC leaks, where Chairwoman Debbie Wassermann Schultz and other key members resigned, Donna was appointed interim Chair of the DNC. She, unsurprisingly, is more of the same, and gets dropped by CNN
Do wake up at the back Duck!
boxxob said:
it was already discussed on here months ago. Curiel is (or was) a council member for La Raza. His politics and heritage are fair subjects for questioning an existing, or potential, 'conflict of interest' (or even the appearance thereof), which is something the judge should have put under review himself.
.....which really is uninformed rubbish.Edited by boxxob on Tuesday 1st November 11:30
Why on earth is it a conflict of interest? He's a judge, it's his job to be fair and impartial. Do white/black/muslim judges have a conflict of interest when one of the parties in a case is white/black/muslim? What about police officers - should they be put "under review" if the person they're arresting is from a different racial background? What would have happened if the Judge had been white and some of the people whom Trump defrauded were black or hispanic - should he have been reviewed?
Maybe you believe that Lutfur Rahman was unfairly treated as well because the Judge was white?......
I can't wait to come back here next Wednesday if Trump wins and see the reactions from some of the Clinton fanboys.
I think they are both awful and really can't see how anyone could champion either of them, it's just particularly strange that Clinton fans somehow believe that being a Clinton supporter makes you more intelligent, morally superior and possibly better off financially than someone who is a Trump supporter.
Deluded some of you lot.
I think they are both awful and really can't see how anyone could champion either of them, it's just particularly strange that Clinton fans somehow believe that being a Clinton supporter makes you more intelligent, morally superior and possibly better off financially than someone who is a Trump supporter.
Deluded some of you lot.
Budflicker said:
I can't wait to come back here next Wednesday if Trump wins and see the reactions from some of the Clinton fanboys.
I think they are both awful and really can't see how anyone could champion either of them, it's just particularly strange that Clinton fans somehow believe that being a Clinton supporter makes you more intelligent, morally superior and possibly better off financially than someone who is a Trump supporter.
Deluded some of you lot.
It's the ultimate irony in actuality. They fall for all the classic smears (race-baiting, red-baiting, etc.) with virtually nothing to back it up, while their candidate of choice is one of the most corrupt individuals ever to run for the office of the presidency. I've lost track of the dirt revealed so far. I think they are both awful and really can't see how anyone could champion either of them, it's just particularly strange that Clinton fans somehow believe that being a Clinton supporter makes you more intelligent, morally superior and possibly better off financially than someone who is a Trump supporter.
Deluded some of you lot.
It's all bad enough that even left-leaning 3rd party voters and liberal anti-secrecy organizations like Wikileaks and Anonymous feel compelled to point out reality to the mass of baying cretins backing this woman. The saddest part of all is that there are two legit alternatives who are floundering, and a third who had the nomination stolen from him by his own party.
scherzkeks said:
It's the ultimate irony in actuality. They fall for all the classic smears (race-baiting, red-baiting, etc.) with virtually nothing to back it up, while their candidate of choice is one of the most corrupt individuals ever to run for the office of the presidency. I've lost track of the dirt revealed so far.
It's all bad enough that even left-leaning 3rd party voters and liberal anti-secrecy organizations like Wikileaks and Anonymous feel compelled to point out reality to the mass of baying cretins backing this woman. The saddest part of all is that there are two legit alternatives who are floundering, and a third who had the nomination stolen from him by his own party.
Can you imagine how far ahead in the polls Bernie Sanders would be right now?It's all bad enough that even left-leaning 3rd party voters and liberal anti-secrecy organizations like Wikileaks and Anonymous feel compelled to point out reality to the mass of baying cretins backing this woman. The saddest part of all is that there are two legit alternatives who are floundering, and a third who had the nomination stolen from him by his own party.
It shows how bad Clinton is that Trumps even still in it.
unrepentant said:
Wow. Firstly that was reported on this very thread yesterday as news. Secondly Brazile resigned from CNN two weeks ago, as was also pointed out on this thread yesterday. So not even news yesterday when it was first bought up here. Definitely not news now.
Do wake up at the back Duck!
so you do acknowledge the elections are heavily manipulated in her favor?!Do wake up at the back Duck!
Budflicker said:
Can you imagine how far ahead in the polls Bernie Sanders would be right now?
It shows how bad Clinton is that Trumps even still in it.
I think Bernie would have a harder/closer race.It shows how bad Clinton is that Trumps even still in it.
Even posts in this thread (in this forum FFS) scream 'socialist' (without understanding what that actually means) every so often in an attempt to conjure up some nasty lefty bogeyman. A lot of people fall for that huckster trick in the USA.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff