Teenage girl missing in Bristol....
Discussion
GloverMart said:
Yep, confirmed on the BBC....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-31672...
Another strange quote, this time from the girl's grandfather who says that the father won't be helping with the search due to his "frantic emotional state".
Has the article been edited? I couldn't find the quote.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-31672...
Another strange quote, this time from the girl's grandfather who says that the father won't be helping with the search due to his "frantic emotional state".
What was significant to me was the removal from her home of her mobile phone, laptop and tablet, the same all without chargers, and apparently all of the same not used since their removal. Also was the odd quote from her mother, that Rebecca would not visit her and her brother, without being accompanied by her best friend.
It may also be significant that a search was carried out today at Vassels Park, the same some distance and also outside of the area of Rebecca's home.
It may also be significant that a search was carried out today at Vassels Park, the same some distance and also outside of the area of Rebecca's home.
torqueofthedevil said:
Saw the interview earlier. Looks very guilty.
Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
I guess they could do but, and I suppose this is far fetched, what is stopping them saying they've arrested two people but not actually arresting anyone to elicit some reaction from whoever is guilty?Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
Spotted this too on Twitter earlier from the Daily Mail online...
https://twitter.com/Ak2oid/status/5717819617500856...
Edited by GloverMart on Sunday 1st March 00:34
GloverMart said:
I guess they could do but, and I suppose this is far fetched, what is stopping them saying they've arrested two people but not actually arresting anyone to elicit some reaction from whoever is guilty?
Spotted this too on Twitter earlier from the Daily Mail online...
https://twitter.com/Ak2oid/status/5717819617500856...
Just me who pictured a scene or two from Breaking Bad when seeing that photo? Spotted this too on Twitter earlier from the Daily Mail online...
https://twitter.com/Ak2oid/status/5717819617500856...
Edited by GloverMart on Sunday 1st March 00:34
torqueofthedevil said:
Saw the interview earlier. Looks very guilty.
Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
No, false arrest is a crime .Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
superkartracer said:
torqueofthedevil said:
Saw the interview earlier. Looks very guilty.
Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
No, false arrest is a crime .Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
It is very interesting the things that psychologists look for when somebody is lying - ad had been said earlier - the terminology they use "she was a good girl" instead of "is" and referring to murder or rape etc. The reaction when you tel them that you have caught somebody and you think you have got the right person must be so telling. If imagine body language that would be very telling followed by a load of questions that would further reveal their guilt.
It always amazes me at how slapdash someone is after murdering someone; her laptop has been found in undergrowth in the local area, assuming it was disposed of there by her killer (assuming she has been killed), if that was me I would do my hardest to make sure any personal items couldn't be found, I would break up the laptop and dump bits miles away or in a river, or local industrial bins, or on a bonfire, I'd remove the hard drive and try my best to destroy it.
So often, obvious things are found and found very easily and quickly.
Anyway back to the arrest thing, perhaps no one has been arrested and they Police are just saying it to gauge a reaction?
So often, obvious things are found and found very easily and quickly.
Anyway back to the arrest thing, perhaps no one has been arrested and they Police are just saying it to gauge a reaction?
torqueofthedevil said:
Saw the interview earlier. Looks very guilty.
Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
As others have said. This is definately no go. However, arresting someone in order to question someone on the basis of ruling them out, after questioning, is acceptable. It can and does happen. IANAL but do have a degree in CJ. My interest in the subject was sparked many years ago for a particular reason.Later, in my 20's I had an incident-not in this Country BTW and In the days of no CCTV, of having to account for my movements-it was very difficult to prove a negative. Can't say I disagree with it though-even though it did make me raise a concerned eyebrow- just in the wrong place at the wrong time-or not, as it turned out. Bodies in The Barrel case, South Australia, if any one is interested.Re the two arrests - is it beyond reason to say that the police, could arrest some people who seem a bit suspicious but who they don't actually think did it, to further monitor their real suspect's reaction?
They must use that as a tool?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff