Jeremy Clarkson suspended by BBC...

Jeremy Clarkson suspended by BBC...

Author
Discussion

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Saturday 28th March 2015
quotequote all
nyxster said:
mph1977 said:
fruitcake hatstand wibble sardine corsetiere haddock p'tang p'tang
Parklife.
Two well deserved chuckles.

That'll run and run.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Saturday 28th March 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
mybrainhurts said:
Ari said:
don4l said:
You are asking the wrong questions.

500 jobs will be lost. I'm sure that the 500 affected families will understand that Clarkson had to go, and the sacrifice of their jobs was a small price to pay.

This is what happens when lefties try to take the high moral ground.

The real victim in this is Oisin.

He didn't want to report the assault. He doesn't want to give any evidence to the police.

Oisin could easily have come out of this with a £50k bonus and a secure future. Instead, the people who are pretending to be outraged that he was assaulted, have forced him into hiding. These people were not outraged because Oisin was assaulted. They are outraged that Clarkson assaulted someone.

In fact, I would say that they are not outraged at all. They reacted with glee when the story broke. They had an opportunity to bring down one of the few "non-lefties" that remain at the BBC.

So, the real victim will never see justice. Far from being compensated, he will be punished for years to come.

So, I have a question for those of you wanted Clarkson sacked. Are you pleased about the outcome for the victim - you know a chap called Oisin Tymon?

Another question, should Oisin have had any say in Clarkson's punishment?
WTF!? biggrin

Just when you think this thread can't get any worse...
Can't see anything that's not true in don's post, what's your problem?
Victims do not get to set punishments for the perpetrators of an offence. Not in this country. Oisin might have been quite happy to carry on working with JC, but other BBC employees may not be so happy and should not have to work with someone who has a record of attacking subordinates on Oisin's say so.

If I was attacked at work by a colleague, I'd complain to my employers. If I was attacked at work by a colleague who'd previously attacked someone else and my employers knew about his or her history, I wouldn't complain to my employers, I'd sue them. For knowingly placing me in a position of danger.

The BBC would have needed to consider that.
You poor dear. That's the problem, most modern men have gone all feminine. No bloody backbone....smile

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Saturday 28th March 2015
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
You poor dear. That's the problem, most modern men have gone all feminine. No bloody backbone....smile
or perhaps it's that we've managed to walk upright and therefore aren't in chronic pain from abraded knuckles ... ?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Saturday 28th March 2015
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
mybrainhurts said:
You poor dear. That's the problem, most modern men have gone all feminine. No bloody backbone....smile
or perhaps it's that we've managed to walk upright and therefore aren't in chronic pain from abraded knuckles ... ?
Really? Well done, didn't know you had it in you...smile

DJRC

23,563 posts

236 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
don4l said:
Motorrad said:
don4l said:
So, the real victim will never see justice. Far from being compensated, he will be punished for years to come.

So, I have a question for those of you wanted Clarkson sacked. Are you pleased about the outcome for the victim - you know a chap called Oisin Tymon?

Another question, should Oisin have had any say in Clarkson's punishment?
No personal interest/agenda whatsoever here.

Dislike the BBC, find top gear a bore.

You cannot assault a colleague and expect to keep your job. Really that's the end of the story.
I know that.

You ignored my questions.
I asked about the real victim, and you responded exactly as I expected. Your post doesn't mention Oisin once.

You have reinforced my view that there is a certain section of society who will pursue their own agenda without regard to the consequences for innocent victims.

In your world, Oisin's future is a small price to pay to pacify your moral outrage.

Also, you said "No personal interest/agenda whatsoever here. "

I only click on threads that interest me. I'm sure that this applies to most people. I'm also sure that you will understand that readers will be surprised that you have not only clicked on a thread that you have no interest in, but you also took the trouble to post in it.

I'm really struggling to believe that you are being entirely honest.
Eh? Your questions are irrelevant and his post highlighted that. I couldn't really give a fk if Oisin topped himself tomorrow, if the rest of his family were wiped out in a motorway accident and his best mate got shot in the bks by a one armed lesbian.

The fact remains you lamp someone at work = get the book thrown at you. Everything Clarkson has said or done since the incident would seem to indicate he knew this as well.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
mybrainhurts said:
Ari said:
don4l said:
You are asking the wrong questions.

500 jobs will be lost. I'm sure that the 500 affected families will understand that Clarkson had to go, and the sacrifice of their jobs was a small price to pay.

This is what happens when lefties try to take the high moral ground.

The real victim in this is Oisin.

He didn't want to report the assault. He doesn't want to give any evidence to the police.

Oisin could easily have come out of this with a £50k bonus and a secure future. Instead, the people who are pretending to be outraged that he was assaulted, have forced him into hiding. These people were not outraged because Oisin was assaulted. They are outraged that Clarkson assaulted someone.

In fact, I would say that they are not outraged at all. They reacted with glee when the story broke. They had an opportunity to bring down one of the few "non-lefties" that remain at the BBC.

So, the real victim will never see justice. Far from being compensated, he will be punished for years to come.

So, I have a question for those of you wanted Clarkson sacked. Are you pleased about the outcome for the victim - you know a chap called Oisin Tymon?

Another question, should Oisin have had any say in Clarkson's punishment?
WTF!? biggrin

Just when you think this thread can't get any worse...
Can't see anything that's not true in don's post, what's your problem?
that's because you are both giving the impression of cut from the same rabidly socipoathic ' powerfully built' libertarian cloth where money overrides the law and common deceny
Sorry, I missed this when you posted it.

You're still dishing out those pathetic insults, but can't take valid criticism yourself.

If you carry on like this, you really must stop whingeing when you don't like the way things are going.

AW111

9,674 posts

133 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
fruitcake hatstand wibble sardine corsetiere haddock p'tang p'tang
At last the plan swings into action! I will mobilise the lizards at once.





I took a break for a while, and come back here to find it seems to be getting a bit petty.

Back on topic (ish), how much of topgear's IP is owned by the BBC?

The name, obviously. The stig, star in a reasonably priced car, probably the cool wall, ditto the props (hilux etc.)
Anything else?

If JC starts "Jezza Gear" with "The Swig" and gets sued by the BBC, this thread will run forever.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Wtf are you lot still arguing about. It's all finished. He's gone.

Hopefully somewhere else with loads of cash and more than 6 episodes a season


It's win win.

Corpulent Tosser

5,459 posts

245 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
don4l said:
So, I have a question for those of you wanted Clarkson sacked.
Clarkson wasn't sacked, BBC declined to renew his contract. This was though because of his gross misconduct.

don4l said:
Are you pleased about the outcome for the victim - you know a chap called Oisin Tymon?
No I am not, a much better outcome would have been Clarkson accepting that he was late for dinner and taking what was on offer.


don4l said:
Another question, should Oisin have had any say in Clarkson's punishment?
No.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
In the news the D.G. Has received death threats re the JC sacking!!!!


WTF are these troll morons thinking? Its a bloody car show was good now its over end of story, are these individuals mentally disturbed or think they are immune to prosecution

Hope the old bill catch these idiots are charge them accordingly.

bitchstewie

51,203 posts

210 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
In the news the D.G. Has received death threats re the JC sacking!!!!


WTF are these troll morons thinking? Its a bloody car show was good now its over end of story, are these individuals mentally disturbed or think they are immune to prosecution

Hope the old bill catch these idiots are charge them accordingly.
It's just words, you'd think he'd just man up and get on with it. Oh hold on a moment... biggrin

Ari

19,347 posts

215 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
In the news the D.G. Has received death threats re the JC sacking!!!!


WTF are these troll morons thinking? Its a bloody car show was good now its over end of story, are these individuals mentally disturbed or think they are immune to prosecution

Hope the old bill catch these idiots are charge them accordingly.
Normally I'd say it was unbelievable, but having read this thread...

It is astonishing though. frown

Ari

19,347 posts

215 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Can't see anything that's not true in don's post, what's your problem?
No, I don't suppose you can.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
In the news the D.G. Has received death threats re the JC sacking!!!!


WTF are these troll morons thinking? Its a bloody car show was good now its over end of story, are these individuals mentally disturbed or think they are immune to prosecution

Hope the old bill catch these idiots are charge them accordingly.
Internet innit.

Ingredients are there. People seem to think they have some ownership of the bloke. They hate the BBC. The internet seems to allow people to lose sensibility.


Dog Star

16,132 posts

168 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Wtf are you lot still arguing about. It's all finished. He's gone.

Hopefully somewhere else with loads of cash and more than 6 episodes a season


It's win win.
Absolutely! Fresh start and new ideas too.

And another thing - I'd laugh my arse off if Oisin went with them (I really don't consider it beyond the bounds of possibility)

don4l

10,058 posts

176 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Dog Star said:
Pesty said:
Wtf are you lot still arguing about. It's all finished. He's gone.

Hopefully somewhere else with loads of cash and more than 6 episodes a season


It's win win.
Absolutely! Fresh start and new ideas too.

And another thing - I'd laugh my arse off if Oisin went with them (I really don't consider it beyond the bounds of possibility)
I agree that Oisin would likely go with them. He has worked with Clarkson for 10 years, and apart from a small incident, their relationship appears to be quite good.

Jimbo0912

72 posts

172 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Lots of people have the opinion that now Clarkson has moved on from the BBC, the team will go with him, the new car series will earn a gazillion pounds a minute and everyone will be as happy as Larry (whoever he is). But it's not that simple.

Regardless of any business/legal wranglings behind the scene, Clarkson hit the self-destruct button in a very public way. His life is imploding around him.

In the last 2 years, his mother died, he was caught cheating on his 2nd wife, he's going through an expensive and protracted divorce, he's had controversies at work, and he has a well known alcohol problem which seems to be getting worse. He's drinking so much that even he and has friends have admitted that he has a problem with alcohol in print! Every time he's turned up at a public appearance, he appears to be pissed. This is not normal.

I think rival broadcasters will avoid him until he sorts out at least some of these issues.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
History channel advert on just now.


No Top Gear on at 8pm tonight now time to watch a real car show History 8pm Sundays smile.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

219 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Ari said:
Normally I'd say it was unbelievable, but having read this thread...
Yeh......pages and pages of death threats on here......right?

troublesbrewing

42 posts

123 months

Sunday 29th March 2015
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
Ari said:
Normally I'd say it was unbelievable, but having read this thread...
Yeh......pages and pages of death threats on here......right?
Well, some of the people posting here seem to be very excitable and think that JC has been treated badly....