Jeremy Clarkson suspended by BBC...
Discussion
Adrian W said:
If Amazon really paid £160million for this, Danny Cohen has to be sacked, if he's right or wrong I would just fire him, even if he sued me it would have been peanuts in comparison.
£5m for 3 years or £160m for 3 years....No wonder JC and his crew simply couldn't give a toss when contracts not renewed.
SPS said:
Oh working for Amazon - you know the ones that pay all that tax
Who the hell watches that?
I would rather watch 5th Gear - at least the cars get a look in instead of three middle aged (well one of em is oldish) pissing around and laughing at each others jokes.
What tax are they not paying? Do you mean corporation tax, ie a tax on company profits. Amazon is not a very profitable company, especially given its turnover. Who the hell watches that?
I would rather watch 5th Gear - at least the cars get a look in instead of three middle aged (well one of em is oldish) pissing around and laughing at each others jokes.
Business Insider, quoting the FT
http://uk.businessinsider.com/jeremy-clarkson-and-...
Feck! $250 million over 3 years. Serious money or what! Assume that includes production costs.
Meanwhile on the PC dinosaur BBC , we are forced to pay for professional bores like Claire Balding if we have the cheek to watch Freeview or etc.
The world's changing , its not waiting for the BBC to catch up.
http://uk.businessinsider.com/jeremy-clarkson-and-...
Feck! $250 million over 3 years. Serious money or what! Assume that includes production costs.
Meanwhile on the PC dinosaur BBC , we are forced to pay for professional bores like Claire Balding if we have the cheek to watch Freeview or etc.
The world's changing , its not waiting for the BBC to catch up.
98elise said:
SPS said:
Oh working for Amazon - you know the ones that pay all that tax
Who the hell watches that?
I would rather watch 5th Gear - at least the cars get a look in instead of three middle aged (well one of em is oldish) pissing around and laughing at each others jokes.
What tax are they not paying? Do you mean corporation tax, ie a tax on company profits. Amazon is not a very profitable company, especially given its turnover. Who the hell watches that?
I would rather watch 5th Gear - at least the cars get a look in instead of three middle aged (well one of em is oldish) pissing around and laughing at each others jokes.
Chillax babes
Very interesting article here :
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/amazon%E2%80%...
Taken from a DT article. Bang on the nail from what I can make of things.
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/amazon%E2%80%...
Taken from a DT article. Bang on the nail from what I can make of things.
98elise said:
What tax are they not paying? Do you mean corporation tax, ie a tax on company profits. Amazon is not a very profitable company, especially given its turnover.
Actually global profits of Amazon are shockingly bad/low. Tesco make more on a tiny fraction of the revenue yet Amazon are the sweethearts of the Dow Jones. Welshbeef said:
technodup said:
I'll not be sjgnung up for prime but I'll still watch it. Theres not much tv I consider worth paying for, and Top Gear isn't an exception.
How will you still watch it as its subscription only now - or will you be leveraging someone else who has paid so you don't have to...Welshbeef said:
98elise said:
What tax are they not paying? Do you mean corporation tax, ie a tax on company profits. Amazon is not a very profitable company, especially given its turnover.
Actually global profits of Amazon are shockingly bad/low. Tesco make more on a tiny fraction of the revenue yet Amazon are the sweethearts of the Dow Jones. remember what all the city people said about Murdock pouring millions into Sky TV and how it would never make a profit?
Cheese Mechanic said:
Very interesting article here :
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/amazon%E2%80%...
Taken from a DT article. Bang on the nail from what I can make of things.
Yep, spot on.http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/amazon%E2%80%...
Taken from a DT article. Bang on the nail from what I can make of things.
Scuffers said:
Welshbeef said:
98elise said:
What tax are they not paying? Do you mean corporation tax, ie a tax on company profits. Amazon is not a very profitable company, especially given its turnover.
Actually global profits of Amazon are shockingly bad/low. Tesco make more on a tiny fraction of the revenue yet Amazon are the sweethearts of the Dow Jones. remember what all the city people said about Murdock pouring millions into Sky TV and how it would never make a profit?
How many firms can match it?
Snozzwangler said:
Scuffers said:
Welshbeef said:
98elise said:
What tax are they not paying? Do you mean corporation tax, ie a tax on company profits. Amazon is not a very profitable company, especially given its turnover.
Actually global profits of Amazon are shockingly bad/low. Tesco make more on a tiny fraction of the revenue yet Amazon are the sweethearts of the Dow Jones. remember what all the city people said about Murdock pouring millions into Sky TV and how it would never make a profit?
How many firms can match it?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff