Germanwings A320 crashed in France :(

Germanwings A320 crashed in France :(

Author
Discussion

Asterix

24,438 posts

229 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Wait til Kate Burley gets over there.
I'd really like to kick her in the sometimes.

She could even keep the shoe.

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

165 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
SKY news have got what looks like a 12 years old aviation "expert" on.

Edited by johnxjsc1985 on Tuesday 24th March 15:17

JRM

2,043 posts

233 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
jeebus said:
Speculation but, Someone posted on pprune:

MM7168 (NOT the Airbus) squawks 7700 at 09:35 GMT, which is 10:35am Central European Time (Promise!) just to the East in Northern Italy.

The Airbus, started the rapid descent at 09:31 GMT, or 10:31 CET.

Could a mid air collision been possible? MM7168 is an Italian fighter jet
The decent looks too smooth to suggest something as major than that - we should start a theory thread! Mine is structural failure leading to fast decompression, pilots switched of auto-pilot in order to descend to a lower altitude, passed out before applying oxygen masks, came round at the lower altitude just enough to set 7700 squawk. Horrible thought though.

bitchstewie

51,448 posts

211 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
And so it begins.

airbusA346

785 posts

154 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
Photo of debris at crash site on below link.

http://www.airlive.net/2015/03/breaking-crash-of-a...

"We have reports crashed #Germanwings #4U9525 plane has 'disintegrated,' and 'largest debris is the size of a car’.

French officer at Germanwings crash site says no apparent survivors; recovery likely to take days.

From reports we have, #Germanwings #4U9525 The plane is completely disintegrated. Debris spread over more than 2 kilometers."

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

179 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
Puggit said:
That would be a stunning piece of news, as French authorities haven't mentioned fighters being scrambled. Obviously it's highly unlikely they would have been the cause of the incident, but it won't stop some people...
Fighter jets are routinely scrambled when a civil airliner loses contact with ATC. French air force also regularly overflies the Alps - may just have been somewhere nearby (and when you can do Mach2, "nearby" could be a quite a long way away).

AlexIT

1,497 posts

139 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
frown
I now understand why they quickly said that there were no survivors...

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

263 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
AlexIT said:
frown
I now understand why they quickly said that there were no survivors...
Hmm, sad day indeed. RIP.

Muddle238

3,908 posts

114 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
jeebus said:
Speculation but, Someone posted on pprune:

MM7168 (NOT the Airbus) squawks 7700 at 09:35 GMT, which is 10:35am Central European Time (Promise!) just to the East in Northern Italy.

The Airbus, started the rapid descent at 09:31 GMT, or 10:31 CET.

Could a mid air collision been possible? MM7168 is an Italian fighter jet
Suppose you were the pilot of MM7168. You're flying along at FL380, when you collide with an Airbus A320. This immediately causes the A320 to start a fairly stable* descent, which goes unchanged and apparently without comms until the A320 makes contact with terrain. Meanwhile in MM7168, you wait a full four minutes before deciding to squawk 7700. Seems a bit unlikely if I'm honest. The last time there was a mid air over European airspace it involved a passenger TU-154 and a DHL B757 over Germany. The impact caused the TU-154 to break up mid-air, whereas the B757 tailfin sheared off. I believe the B757 was able to fly with some form of basic control for a couple of minutes before the lack of yaw control caused a loss of control and in-flight breakup.

  • Based on FR24, the flightpath appeared to maintain a desired lateral track and the descent appeared fairly linear, compared to the sort of flightpath you might expect from an airliner if it was damaged so much from a mid-air that caused it to descend. If that were the case, I'd expect to see a much steeper descent and perhaps some form of spiral lateral path. If it were to breakup, I'd expect a loss of transponder signal before terrain contact, not at terrain contact which appears to be the case today.

sa_20v

4,108 posts

232 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
AlexIT said:
frown
I now understand why they quickly said that there were no survivors...
That does make more sense. RIP. frown

camshafted

938 posts

166 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

165 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
I guess some of us where hoping for a miracle and that we might have found some passengers still alive but it was a forlorn hope.
unlike the missing plane at least the relatives can have some answers to what happend.

RobGT81

5,229 posts

187 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
camshafted said:
Link to an unconfirmed images of the scene.

https://twitter.com/thatjohn/status/58038875604308...
https://twitter.com/AmichaiStein1/status/580389123...

As above, is unconfirmed.
No snow?

Le TVR

3,092 posts

252 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
jeebus said:
Speculation but, Someone posted on pprune:

MM7168 (NOT the Airbus) squawks 7700 at 09:35 GMT, which is 10:35am Central European Time (Promise!) just to the East in Northern Italy.

The Airbus, started the rapid descent at 09:31 GMT, or 10:31 CET.

Could a mid air collision been possible? MM7168 is an Italian fighter jet
Whatever happened started around landfall over Toulon at 09:31.
MM7168 squawks at 09:35 in N Italy.
Toulon to Italian border about 200 km
Time taken to Italian Border 4 minutes
= 3000 kmh or Mach 3+

SR71 was it?

Edited by Le TVR on Tuesday 24th March 15:37

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

165 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
RobGT81 said:
No snow?
thought images of the plane lying in snow had already been produced?.

Cobalt Blue

215 posts

197 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
RobGT81 said:
camshafted said:
Link to an unconfirmed images of the scene.

https://twitter.com/thatjohn/status/58038875604308...
https://twitter.com/AmichaiStein1/status/580389123...

As above, is unconfirmed.
No snow?
Those pictures are on Airlive.net http://www.airlive.net/2015/03/breaking-crash-of-a...

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
camshafted said:
Link to an unconfirmed images of the scene.

https://twitter.com/thatjohn/status/58038875604308...
https://twitter.com/AmichaiStein1/status/580389123...

As above, is unconfirmed.
I get the impression that it piled into the hill at speed and then turned into aluminium confetti. frown

maxxy5

771 posts

165 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
How does a black box survive that and still work

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
And so it begins.
yes

johnxjsc1985

15,948 posts

165 months

Tuesday 24th March 2015
quotequote all
Munter said:
I get the impression that it piled into the hill at speed and then turned into aluminium confetti. frown
yes indeed travelling at 400kts.
LEts hope the poor sods had no awareness of the impact.