UKIP - The Future - Volume 4
Discussion
MGJohn said:
Tattoos .. who really needs them?
A far more relevant and more appropriate question has to be: What the impact on the UK's INTERNational Health Service will be when they go wrong or they need them removed.
Watching Ed. M. on BBC News Channel right Now. He's talking the talk and no doubt will impress many and generate many votes from the believers.
Reality for this Nation is a whole different kettle of ball games.
We're still doomed and I'm still voting for Nigel's party.
Far less than boozing, fighting, drugs and health tourism I'd wager.A far more relevant and more appropriate question has to be: What the impact on the UK's INTERNational Health Service will be when they go wrong or they need them removed.
Watching Ed. M. on BBC News Channel right Now. He's talking the talk and no doubt will impress many and generate many votes from the believers.
Reality for this Nation is a whole different kettle of ball games.
We're still doomed and I'm still voting for Nigel's party.
PRTVR said:
I find it interesting that people go out of their way to find stories like this, was it posted on the UKIP website? No, what possible point could there be to this type of story its not like there is an election coming up, all some people can do is to try to discredit other parties, because that all the main parties can do, because they cannot offer the electorate anything.its Sad really.
It's beyond sad. It's just another indicator that those we entrust to getting things right for the Nation cannot be entrusted to do so. So use mud-slinging tactics to deflect attention from the things that really matter thus nothing really done and a ploy which solves nothing!WinstonWolf said:
The question still stands, why should the colour of the ink on someone's skin matter?
Funny how you're so insistent on an answer when you aren't capable of providing one yourself, when asked. FYI, he didn't say the colour of ink made any difference, indeed he said "less tattoos" which doesn't mean no tattoos, but go ahead creating another 10 pages of bulls
t because you need to try and make a point, and look less like a coward.
968 said:
WinstonWolf said:
The question still stands, why should the colour of the ink on someone's skin matter?
Funny how you're so insistent on an answer when you aren't capable of providing one yourself, when asked. FYI, he didn't say the colour of ink made any difference, indeed he said "less tattoos" which doesn't mean no tattoos, but go ahead creating another 10 pages of bullst because you need to try and make a point, and look less like a coward.So having more tattoos makes someone a bad person, what does the amount of ink someone has tell you about them?
mrpurple said:
Einion Yrth said:
TKF said:
End you ridiculous trolling now
Hypocrisy much?TKF, if you're going to project your own preconceptions on people just for wanting to leave the EU you need to accept that you will come under scrutiny too.
So bringing Ian Brady up, that was merely to advance the debate on the subject of deeper political integration into Europe?
Clippety clop.
MGJohn said:
So that makes it just fine in your books ? ... maybe, or, not.
Have you got ink designs on your largest bodily organ ?
No, I don't think people should have them removed for free, unless they are causing health implications, the "I don't like it anymore" or "I really loved Angela at the time but she's left me now" brigade don't garner as much sympathy, from me anyway....Have you got ink designs on your largest bodily organ ?
No ink here! I have nothing against them though, I just don't really have anything that means that much to me
I do have to wonder as to what goes on through some peoples minds when they do get inked though, why would you want four stars on the back of your neck for example? Does it mean we could keep her in the freezer for a month? :S
Edited by Axionknight on Monday 27th April 12:44
Axionknight said:
the "I don't like it anymore" or "I really loved Angela at the time but she's left me now" brigade don't garner as much sympathy, from me anyway....
Well that'll just be a constant reminder to Cameron not to consider Merkel's support re any EU negotiations on the free movement of labour as being in the bag. WinstonWolf said:
mrpurple said:
Einion Yrth said:
TKF said:
End you ridiculous trolling now
Hypocrisy much?TKF, if you're going to project your own preconceptions on people just for wanting to leave the EU you need to accept that you will come under scrutiny too.
So bringing Ian Brady up, that was merely to advance the debate on the subject of deeper political integration into Europe?
Clippety clop.
What do you want to do with that admission? Say, "Well if you have your prejudices then I am entitled to mine?" or what?
What is the actual purpose of this attempt at point scoring?
moleamol said:
WinstonWolf said:
Disastrous said:
WinstonWolf said:
You're rattled, how cute.
Are you willing to share your reasons for your prejudice against people with inked skin with the group?
You have been very outspoken about people you *think* are prejudiced in the past, it's only right and proper you explain what you really meant by it.
Nobody can really be that stupid so presume you're simply pretending to think that TKF has a problem with tattoos to avoid his actual point?Are you willing to share your reasons for your prejudice against people with inked skin with the group?
You have been very outspoken about people you *think* are prejudiced in the past, it's only right and proper you explain what you really meant by it.
Prejudice comes in many forms...
A mildly amusing and completely tattoo-free diversion...
http://www.liblabcon.com/blog/2015/4/27/councils-n...
http://www.liblabcon.com/blog/2015/4/27/councils-n...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff