UKIP - The Future - Volume 4
Discussion
BGARK said:
Not been on the thread for a few days, I am confused as to why people are discussing tattoos, has this moved onto the ladder with the topic of gay people as the most important subject for our country?
TKF made a comment suggesting that UKIP supporters were similar to BNP supporters, but with blazers and fewer tattoos.In the past, TKF has been quick to suggest that other people are bigots.
As you can imagine, we are all outraged, and also embarrassed that one of our brethern would use such offensive language.
TKF has, so far, expressed no remorse.
don4l said:
TKF made a comment suggesting that UKIP supporters were similar to BNP supporters, but with blazers and fewer tattoos.
In the past, TKF has been quick to suggest that other people are bigots.
As you can imagine, we are all outraged, and also embarrassed that one of our brethern would use such offensive language.
TKF has, so far, expressed no remorse.
Ah, all is clear now. I don't think I have seen TKF say much positive about anything really?In the past, TKF has been quick to suggest that other people are bigots.
As you can imagine, we are all outraged, and also embarrassed that one of our brethern would use such offensive language.
TKF has, so far, expressed no remorse.
I'm absolutely positive that the kippers' obsession with a simple factual comment is borderline creepy. I'm also positive the PH mods have enjoyed it being spread over a dozen or so pages now. I've explained myself more than once and asked nicely for them to drop it. Then I asked them to shut up. And yet, here we are, with an ongoing argument built entirely over something I didn't say in the first place.
So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
Ip appears that on 8th May Dan Hodges will be streaking through Whitehall.
order-order.com/2015/04/27/10-days-until-dan-hodge...
It just shows how much things have changed over the last couple of years.
order-order.com/2015/04/27/10-days-until-dan-hodge...
It just shows how much things have changed over the last couple of years.
TKF..... your input is required over here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
TKF said:
I'm absolutely positive that the kippers' obsession with a simple factual comment is borderline creepy. I'm also positive the PH mods have enjoyed it being spread over a dozen or so pages now. I've explained myself more than once and asked nicely for them to drop it. Then I asked them to shut up. And yet, here we are, with an ongoing argument built entirely over something I didn't say in the first place.
So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
thank fk!So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
Axionknight said:
MGJohn said:
So that makes it just fine in your books ? ... maybe, or, not.
Have you got ink designs on your largest bodily organ ?
No, I don't think people should have them removed for free, unless they are causing health implications, the "I don't like it anymore" or "I really loved Angela at the time but she's left me now" brigade don't garner as much sympathy, from me anyway....Have you got ink designs on your largest bodily organ ?
No ink here! I have nothing against them though, I just don't really have anything that means that much to me
I do have to wonder as to what goes on through some peoples minds when they do get inked though, why would you want four stars on the back of your neck for example? Does it mean we could keep her in the freezer for a month? :S
Edited by Axionknight on Monday 27th April 12:44
TKF said:
I'm absolutely positive that the kippers' obsession with a simple factual comment is borderline creepy. I'm also positive the PH mods have enjoyed it being spread over a dozen or so pages now. I've explained myself more than once and asked nicely for them to drop it. Then I asked them to shut up. And yet, here we are, with an ongoing argument built entirely over something I didn't say in the first place.
So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
So what about people who don't have Tatoos ?So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
To be fair to TKF, I'd be wary, and a little judgemental of people with tattoos of certain things, namely, and make of this what you will, any tattoos that show how patriotic said person is. Especially if they're on show.
I've got a friend literally smothered in ink, but nothing like Union or st George flags, British bulldogs and the like. You know the sort.
And don't anyone pretend they don't judge people on their first impressions of them. I've learned over the years that it's human nature to do so.
Does Nigel Farage still want a labour government for the next term? I'm sure I remember him saying this last year.
I've got a friend literally smothered in ink, but nothing like Union or st George flags, British bulldogs and the like. You know the sort.
And don't anyone pretend they don't judge people on their first impressions of them. I've learned over the years that it's human nature to do so.
Does Nigel Farage still want a labour government for the next term? I'm sure I remember him saying this last year.
Guam said:
And in the "you couldn't make it up box" today (although it is the Express)
http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/573235/Crai...
this is probably deserving of a thread all on it,s own .astounding hypocrisy ,perfect example of what people are sick of when it comes to liblabcon,yet vast swathes of the red and blue tribes will all tick the same old box on election day.http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/573235/Crai...
TKF said:
I'm absolutely positive that the kippers' obsession with a simple factual comment is borderline creepy. I'm also positive the PH mods have enjoyed it being spread over a dozen or so pages now. I've explained myself more than once and asked nicely for them to drop it. Then I asked them to shut up. And yet, here we are, with an ongoing argument built entirely over something I didn't say in the first place.
So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
What on Earth do you mean when you claim that you didn't say it?So, I'll repeat this one more time for the terminally thick trolls, I do not have a problem with people that have tattoos.
The end.
TKF said:
Some people see Farage and UKIP as BNP in blazers. A sort of BNP lite whose core message is fundamentally the same but they're better spoken and have fewer tattoos.
It is on page 83 of this thread, in case anyone doubts me.You are clearly correlating UKIP and the BNP. You are also correlating tattoos and the BNP. You either see nothing wrong with the BNP, or you are attempting to insult UKIP supporters, and also people with tattoos.
I wonder if you think that you are more intelligent than people with tattoos? I suspect that you do.
wc98 said:
Guam said:
And in the "you couldn't make it up box" today (although it is the Express)
http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/573235/Crai...
this is probably deserving of a thread all on it,s own .astounding hypocrisy ,perfect example of what people are sick of when it comes to liblabcon,yet vast swathes of the red and blue tribes will all tick the same old box on election day.http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/573235/Crai...
don4l said:
It is on page 83 of this thread, in case anyone doubts me.
You are clearly correlating UKIP and the BNP. You are also correlating tattoos and the BNP. You either see nothing wrong with the BNP, or you are attempting to insult UKIP supporters, and also people with tattoos.
I wonder if you think that you are more intelligent than people with tattoos? I suspect that you do.
So what if he does? WHat have you won by making that point?You are clearly correlating UKIP and the BNP. You are also correlating tattoos and the BNP. You either see nothing wrong with the BNP, or you are attempting to insult UKIP supporters, and also people with tattoos.
I wonder if you think that you are more intelligent than people with tattoos? I suspect that you do.
Why is everyone so desperate to make such an irrelevant point that they are willing to go at it for 15 pages?
Here, just pick on me instead:
I believe that if you took the average intelligence of people with tattoos and compared it with the average intelligence of people without, the latter would have a higher average or at the very least a better education.
There.
On a UKIP thread with UKIP standards of proof, surely I am entitled just to have observed it?
On a more serious note I highly doubt there has ever been a study on this so I can't offer a source, so with that in mind I would be more than happy to change my viewpoint if anyone provided one. I think that's where we differ.
On a more serious note I highly doubt there has ever been a study on this so I can't offer a source, so with that in mind I would be more than happy to change my viewpoint if anyone provided one. I think that's where we differ.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff