UKIP - The Future - Volume 4

[anonymous-user]

Scuffers said:

throwing rocks is easy, any muppet can do that!

And yet it is a skill you lack.

[treepke]

968 said:

treepke said:

Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands..... I pop out for a couple of hours and you've made posts here there and everywhere.

You should be a politician as you know full well I didn't say "prevents" cataracts now did I?

Your Iphone or the Trust's?

Smart phones are wonderful things aren't they? A few patients have failed to attend (again) so have had a few minutes to post. Oh and drops will not cure/prevent or do anything else to cataracts. The only option for treatment for the forseeable future is surgery. There is nothing else that works.

Last time I will thread divert promise.

No merits in this then?

http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-develo...

[Zod]

968 said:

treepke said:

Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands..... I pop out for a couple of hours and you've made posts here there and everywhere.

You should be a politician as you know full well I didn't say "prevents" cataracts now did I?

Your Iphone or the Trust's?

Smart phones are wonderful things aren't they? A few patients have failed to attend (again) so have had a few minutes to post. Oh and drops will not cure/prevent or do anything else to cataracts. The only option for treatment for the forseeable future is surgery. There is nothing else that works.

A favourite PH attack: you can't be any good at your job because you post so much.

[treepke]

Zod said:

968 said:

treepke said:

Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands..... I pop out for a couple of hours and you've made posts here there and everywhere.

You should be a politician as you know full well I didn't say "prevents" cataracts now did I?

Your Iphone or the Trust's?

Smart phones are wonderful things aren't they? A few patients have failed to attend (again) so have had a few minutes to post. Oh and drops will not cure/prevent or do anything else to cataracts. The only option for treatment for the forseeable future is surgery. There is nothing else that works.

A favourite PH attack: you can't be any good at your job because you post so much.

Another one that should be a politician also.... I did not make any reference to how good he was at his job just how much time he appeared to have after stating he would be very busy today.

Please explain how / where I commented on his aptitude.

[968]

treepke said:

Last time I will thread divert promise.

No merits in this then?

http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-develo...

No. None whatsoever currently. It hasn't been trialled in human subjects or undergone any clinical trials. This approach was taken some years ago and found to be of no benefit.

[treepke]

968 said:

treepke said:

Last time I will thread divert promise.

No merits in this then?

http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-develo...

No. None whatsoever currently. It hasn't been trialled in human subjects or undergone any clinical trials. This approach was taken some years ago and found to be of no benefit.

Thanks

FYI and Zod's info I have always regarded your posts very highly in the health forums, just not in this one.

[brenflys777]

AW111 said:

968 said:

Curious if it did receive funding that they should deny it. Perhaps it was an oversight? A bit like all those expenses various meps and MPs have strenuously denied then admitted to. Or perhaps like NFs promise to stand down if he didn't win a seat in the election?

I'm generally supportive of your views on here, but that's a poor comparison.

There is, however, a difference between not listing something (be it accidental or deliberate) and denying something. Did the BBC actively deny the funding, or just not publish it?

I'm on a day of stand by for work so the rigours of kids prevented finding the time for an earlier reply

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015-03-02/bbc-deni...
From the Radio Times in March. BBC deny UKIP complaint that the programme had any EU funding.

Today's change from the Electoral Commission of the wording of the referendum is a step towards fairness IMO. Making the BBC or any other state funded apparatus advertise their EU funding would be another step towards a fair unequivocal referendum.

[968]

treepke said:

Thanks

FYI and Zod's info I have always regarded your posts very highly in the health forums, just not in this one.

Thanks (I think). I guess we can't agree on everything.

[Zod]

treepke said:

Another one that should be a politician also.... I did not make any reference to how good he was at his job just how much time he appeared to have after stating he would be very busy today.

Please explain how / where I commented on his aptitude.

What is this supposed to imply?

treepke said:

Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands.

[brenflys777]

Zod said:

treepke said:

Another one that should be a politician also.... I did not make any reference to how good he was at his job just how much time he appeared to have after stating he would be very busy today.

Please explain how / where I commented on his aptitude.

What is this supposed to imply?

treepke said:

Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands.

My sister is a teacher. She has masses of free time outside of working hours but always complains she's busy, she'll spend an evening marking papers and say she's been marking all day and is really busy. Whilst marking she'll have watched TV, gone on Facebook to moan about it etc etc.

She is also a brilliant teacher and very good at her job.

I make no comment about 968's competence and from what Treepke posted neither has he.

[treepke]

Zod said:

treepke said:

Another one that should be a politician also.... I did not make any reference to how good he was at his job just how much time he appeared to have after stating he would be very busy today.

Please explain how / where I commented on his aptitude.

What is this supposed to imply?

treepke said:

Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands.

Let me guess........ you are a professional twister of words?

What I said was "Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands" which has fook all to do with his ability...in fact it could imply he was so good at his job that he completed his work very quickly and hence had a lot of spare time on his hands.... but that doesn't suit you does it?

[anonymous-user]

treepke said:

Let me guess........ you are a professional twister of words?

What I said was "Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands" which has fook all to do with his ability...in fact it could imply he was so good at his job that he completed his work very quickly and hence had a lot of spare time on his hands.... but that doesn't suit you does it?

Or it could imply that he has no patients because he is bad at his job. Or that he lied when he said he is very busy.

Not sure many readers would have taken your suggested meaning from it though.

[treepke]

Greg66 said:

treepke said:

Let me guess........ you are a professional twister of words?

What I said was "Blimey for a man who is very busy you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands" which has fook all to do with his ability...in fact it could imply he was so good at his job that he completed his work very quickly and hence had a lot of spare time on his hands.... but that doesn't suit you does it?

Or it could imply that he has no patients because he is bad at his job. Or that he lied when he said he is very busy.

Not sure many readers would have taken your suggested meaning from it though.

Casting nasturtiums are we?

[brenflys777]

Interesting article from a journalist whose not normally flattering of Farage in the Telegraph explaining why the No/Out campaign need Farage and UKIP :

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/1183...

[968]

treepke said:

Casting nasturtiums are we?

Chill! At least no one has told me to fk off or called me a liar about my job today. It's progress.

[jjlynn27]

Please rename this thread to 'UKIP - The Past that didn't happen'.

Thanks.

BTW Are Farage and Co. still riding EU gravy train to prove how wasteful it is?

[brenflys777]

jjlynn27 said:

Please rename this thread to 'UKIP - The Past that didn't happen'.

Thanks.

BTW Are Farage and Co. still riding EU gravy train to prove how wasteful it is?

I'll know UKIP have past their peak when people who say UKIP are irrelevant can't be bothered to post about them!

[Scuffers]

brenflys777 said:

I'll know UKIP have past their peak when people who say UKIP are irrelevant can't be bothered to post about them!

Exactly!

[jjlynn27]

brenflys777 said:

I'll know UKIP have past their peak when people who say UKIP are irrelevant can't be bothered to post about them!

It's like homeopathy or thread about directional super extra hifi cables. There are believers and there are people coming in for a quick laugh. I am disappointed by the lack of 'unstoppable train' posts by dan. They were funny.

[anonymous-user]

What, this unstoppable train, carrying all the UKIP MPs?