The looney left
Discussion
Are outraged that we are asking 'undocumented migrants' and tourists to pay for NHS treatment...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nhs-...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nhs-...
Thats because they feel obligated to spend other peoples money, doesn't matter what they spend it on but spend and keep spending, they'll just leave a note telling the next lot there isn't anything left and wish them luck.
The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
gottans said:
Thats because they feel obligated to spend other peoples money, doesn't matter what they spend it on but spend and keep spending, they'll just leave a note telling the next lot there isn't anything left and wish them luck.
The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
Or the next lot may be even less truthful about the state of state finances, like the whopper of a line that the deficit would be a thing of the past come the next election.....Anyone remember that particular cracker from five years ago?The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
xjsdriver said:
Or the next lot may be even less truthful about the state of state finances, like the whopper of a line that the deficit would be a thing of the past come the next election.....Anyone remember that particular cracker from five years ago?
They tried, they failed. Heart in the right place though. Nobody guessed the Eurozone crisis would run on so long. An official from the USA Fed said; 'who could have guessed that the Europeans would just flail around for three years?'desolate said:
s2art said:
They tried, they failed. Heart in the right place though.
Is that what you really meant?gottans said:
Thats because they feel obligated to spend other peoples money, doesn't matter what they spend it on but spend and keep spending, they'll just leave a note telling the next lot there isn't anything left and wish them luck.
The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
They don't have any great, or otherwise, concept of either money or wealth (or even Monet). Not sure the alleged right do either.The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
xjsdriver said:
gottans said:
Thats because they feel obligated to spend other peoples money, doesn't matter what they spend it on but spend and keep spending, they'll just leave a note telling the next lot there isn't anything left and wish them luck.
The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
Or the next lot may be even less truthful about the state of state finances, like the whopper of a line that the deficit would be a thing of the past come the next election.....Anyone remember that particular cracker from five years ago?The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
xjsdriver said:
Or the next lot may be even less truthful about the state of state finances, like the whopper of a line that the deficit would be a thing of the past come the next election.....Anyone remember that particular cracker from five years ago?
The only way we can save ourselves is an extra 180billion of spending per yearAnd i will be voting SNP to ensure we get the UK back on track
xjsdriver said:
gottans said:
Thats because they feel obligated to spend other peoples money, doesn't matter what they spend it on but spend and keep spending, they'll just leave a note telling the next lot there isn't anything left and wish them luck.
The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
Or the next lot may be even less truthful about the state of state finances, like the whopper of a line that the deficit would be a thing of the past come the next election.....Anyone remember that particular cracker from five years ago?The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
Chlamydia said:
xjsdriver said:
gottans said:
Thats because they feel obligated to spend other peoples money, doesn't matter what they spend it on but spend and keep spending, they'll just leave a note telling the next lot there isn't anything left and wish them luck.
The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
Or the next lot may be even less truthful about the state of state finances, like the whopper of a line that the deficit would be a thing of the past come the next election.....Anyone remember that particular cracker from five years ago?The last bit is a bit of advanced thinking because the next lot may have found a bit of money that can be spent in the future.
Some people on here... makes my blood boil.
What were the Labour party saying all through the Tory policies to reduce the deficit ?
Oh yeah Ed Balls and Milliband spent four years saying
1. It won't work
2. There won't be any economic growth
3. The poor will die
4. Crime will go up
5. We need to spend more money to achieve "growth"
6. The sky will fall in.
They opposed every single measure, and what are they left with now, some mediocre whinging that 700,000 people (mostly students) are on zero hours contracts.
Growth, in the top 1 in Europe, and top 2 of developed nations. Unemployment lower than since 1995, More people employed than at any other time in UK history. The deficit has been cut in half... more to do for sure.
But honestly who called the right approach here ? Ed Balls ? Spend spend spend. Or Osbourne who at least has achieve growth during a significant fiscal contraction.
It would be a total economic disaster for the whole UK if SNP/Labour get in.
Gargamel said:
Some people on here... makes my blood boil.
What were the Labour party saying all through the Tory policies to reduce the deficit ?
Oh yeah Ed Balls and Milliband spent four years saying
1. It won't work
2. There won't be any economic growth
3. The poor will die
4. Crime will go up
5. We need to spend more money to achieve "growth"
6. The sky will fall in.
They opposed every single measure, and what are they left with now, some mediocre whinging that 700,000 people (mostly students) are on zero hours contracts.
Growth, in the top 1 in Europe, and top 2 of developed nations. Unemployment lower than since 1995, More people employed than at any other time in UK history. The deficit has been cut in half... more to do for sure.
But honestly who called the right approach here ? Ed Balls ? Spend spend spend. Or Osbourne who at least has achieve growth during a significant fiscal contraction.
It would be a total economic disaster for the whole UK if SNP/Labour get in.
Precisely. All this fuss about zero hour contracts too as if it's something that wasn't around until the Tories came into power. I was working on what are now called zero hour contracts in the 80s, they just weren't called that.What were the Labour party saying all through the Tory policies to reduce the deficit ?
Oh yeah Ed Balls and Milliband spent four years saying
1. It won't work
2. There won't be any economic growth
3. The poor will die
4. Crime will go up
5. We need to spend more money to achieve "growth"
6. The sky will fall in.
They opposed every single measure, and what are they left with now, some mediocre whinging that 700,000 people (mostly students) are on zero hours contracts.
Growth, in the top 1 in Europe, and top 2 of developed nations. Unemployment lower than since 1995, More people employed than at any other time in UK history. The deficit has been cut in half... more to do for sure.
But honestly who called the right approach here ? Ed Balls ? Spend spend spend. Or Osbourne who at least has achieve growth during a significant fiscal contraction.
It would be a total economic disaster for the whole UK if SNP/Labour get in.
Gargamel said:
Some people on here... makes my blood boil.
What were the Labour party saying all through the Tory policies to reduce the deficit ?
Oh yeah Ed Balls and Milliband spent four years saying
1. It won't work
2. There won't be any economic growth
3. The poor will die
4. Crime will go up
5. We need to spend more money to achieve "growth"
6. The sky will fall in.
They opposed every single measure, and what are they left with now, some mediocre whinging that 700,000 people (mostly students) are on zero hours contracts.
Growth, in the top 1 in Europe, and top 2 of developed nations. Unemployment lower than since 1995, More people employed than at any other time in UK history. The deficit has been cut in half... more to do for sure.
But honestly who called the right approach here ? Ed Balls ? Spend spend spend. Or Osbourne who at least has achieve growth during a significant fiscal contraction.
It would be a total economic disaster for the whole UK if SNP/Labour get in.
+1.What were the Labour party saying all through the Tory policies to reduce the deficit ?
Oh yeah Ed Balls and Milliband spent four years saying
1. It won't work
2. There won't be any economic growth
3. The poor will die
4. Crime will go up
5. We need to spend more money to achieve "growth"
6. The sky will fall in.
They opposed every single measure, and what are they left with now, some mediocre whinging that 700,000 people (mostly students) are on zero hours contracts.
Growth, in the top 1 in Europe, and top 2 of developed nations. Unemployment lower than since 1995, More people employed than at any other time in UK history. The deficit has been cut in half... more to do for sure.
But honestly who called the right approach here ? Ed Balls ? Spend spend spend. Or Osbourne who at least has achieve growth during a significant fiscal contraction.
It would be a total economic disaster for the whole UK if SNP/Labour get in.
Chlamydia said:
Gargamel said:
Some people on here... makes my blood boil.
What were the Labour party saying all through the Tory policies to reduce the deficit ?
Oh yeah Ed Balls and Milliband spent four years saying
1. It won't work
2. There won't be any economic growth
3. The poor will die
4. Crime will go up
5. We need to spend more money to achieve "growth"
6. The sky will fall in.
They opposed every single measure, and what are they left with now, some mediocre whinging that 700,000 people (mostly students) are on zero hours contracts.
Growth, in the top 1 in Europe, and top 2 of developed nations. Unemployment lower than since 1995, More people employed than at any other time in UK history. The deficit has been cut in half... more to do for sure.
But honestly who called the right approach here ? Ed Balls ? Spend spend spend. Or Osbourne who at least has achieve growth during a significant fiscal contraction.
It would be a total economic disaster for the whole UK if SNP/Labour get in.
Precisely. All this fuss about zero hour contracts too as if it's something that wasn't around until the Tories came into power. I was working on what are now called zero hour contracts in the 80s, they just weren't called that.What were the Labour party saying all through the Tory policies to reduce the deficit ?
Oh yeah Ed Balls and Milliband spent four years saying
1. It won't work
2. There won't be any economic growth
3. The poor will die
4. Crime will go up
5. We need to spend more money to achieve "growth"
6. The sky will fall in.
They opposed every single measure, and what are they left with now, some mediocre whinging that 700,000 people (mostly students) are on zero hours contracts.
Growth, in the top 1 in Europe, and top 2 of developed nations. Unemployment lower than since 1995, More people employed than at any other time in UK history. The deficit has been cut in half... more to do for sure.
But honestly who called the right approach here ? Ed Balls ? Spend spend spend. Or Osbourne who at least has achieve growth during a significant fiscal contraction.
It would be a total economic disaster for the whole UK if SNP/Labour get in.
Then again that prize of the 'looney left', redistribution of wealth, is alive and well. From pensioners, mondeo man and wolseley woman to e.g. CMD's father-in-law (Sir Windymill Sheffield), the Queen's cousin (the Duke of Gloucester) and the Duchess of Cornwall's son-in-law (Harry Sunshine Lopes) and many more. A great result for the comrades and egalitarianism generally.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/28...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3016115/Th...
Thank goodness Labour pushed the CCA through to enable this 'return to marxism' under Miliband. If Red Ed walks into No 10 in May then at least we can breathe a sigh of relief that the economy will be saved alongside the NHS.
The deficit is the result of not balancing the daily finances, I.e. We are spending more than we make as a country. You wouldn't run your own finances like that, well you shouldn't if you have any sense.
The current government has managed to reduce the deficit/ overdraft but as a country we are still sinking into debt, don't forget we have a national debt that isn't getting any smaller, quite opposite.
Why our polticos think running our finances like this is anywhere near sensible or acceptable I have no idea, wonder how they run their own finances?
The current government has managed to reduce the deficit/ overdraft but as a country we are still sinking into debt, don't forget we have a national debt that isn't getting any smaller, quite opposite.
Why our polticos think running our finances like this is anywhere near sensible or acceptable I have no idea, wonder how they run their own finances?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff