Easter Get Away for Snackbars
Discussion
k yourself.
But the mainstream press use sensationalist and misleading headlines. So what gives?
Those that care about child welfare even though they've shown themselves unwilling to protect children being exploited for sex have been getting their do gooder knickers in a twist over kids playing violent computer games.
So comparing Teachers and Head Teachers saying they don't know what to do about kids possibly being interested in Jihad seems to the potential dangers of violent or sexual computer games seems valid to me.
Imagine if the kids decide to do Jihad in central London rather than in Turkey or Syria, something that's quite possible given the airline pilot driving that Airbus A320 into the ground, and then the Teachers say 'We did suspect something but we didn't know what to do about it', or 'We knew something but wanted to respect their privacy and human rights'?
The Thought Police can't get their act together let alone all sing from the same hymn sheet.
Those that care about child welfare even though they've shown themselves unwilling to protect children being exploited for sex have been getting their do gooder knickers in a twist over kids playing violent computer games.
So comparing Teachers and Head Teachers saying they don't know what to do about kids possibly being interested in Jihad seems to the potential dangers of violent or sexual computer games seems valid to me.
Imagine if the kids decide to do Jihad in central London rather than in Turkey or Syria, something that's quite possible given the airline pilot driving that Airbus A320 into the ground, and then the Teachers say 'We did suspect something but we didn't know what to do about it', or 'We knew something but wanted to respect their privacy and human rights'?
The Thought Police can't get their act together let alone all sing from the same hymn sheet.
Edited by carinaman on Wednesday 1st April 20:43
The_Burg said:
Take it your a bacon dodging, animal throat slitter? Or just have no sense of humour.
Or even worse a proper religionist.
No. I'm just someone who is aware that this is a public site and who really doesn't think that the title of this thread is a great advert for PH.Or even worse a proper religionist.
But I'm not the sort to go running to the Mods, so if they're happy with it, so be it. For me, it's just another nail in the coffin of this place.
But, out of curiosity, if I was a 'bacon dodger', what would be your problem with me?
Oh, and it's 'you're', you ignorant cretin.
Pesty said:
What Is your objection with mocking terrorists who want to slit throats in Iraq and Syria tt? Most of those throats are Muslim by the way.
I made my objections clear in my previous post. I don't think that this is a reasonable thread title for a public forum.A debate about anglo-muslims leaving for Syria is one thing. Intentionally provocative thread titles is something else.
I would be embarrassed to let any Muslim friends of mine know that I contribute to a forum that allows or encourages things like this.
Still, I guess they're just bacon-dodgers, so what does it matter?
So you are getting offended on others behalfs.
As I said above it is mocking terrorists not muslims so your objections do not make sense. Terrorists who are torturing and killing fellow Muslims like your friends wholesale
I'm sure they would not object. These people do not represent Islam.
As I said above it is mocking terrorists not muslims so your objections do not make sense. Terrorists who are torturing and killing fellow Muslims like your friends wholesale
I'm sure they would not object. These people do not represent Islam.
Pesty said:
So you are getting offended on others behalfs.
As I said above it is mocking terrorists not muslims so your objections do not make sense. Terrorists who are torturing and killing fellow Muslims like your friends wholesale
I'm sure they would not object. These people do not represent Islam.
No. I'm offended. As I said above it is mocking terrorists not muslims so your objections do not make sense. Terrorists who are torturing and killing fellow Muslims like your friends wholesale
I'm sure they would not object. These people do not represent Islam.
There was no need for the 'snackbar' in the thread title. That's not poking fun at terrorists, it's a pathetic slur on Muslims and is not the sort of thing I want to see on here.
But hey, it's not my website, so maybe it's all good as far as PH is concerned.
Pesty said:
How dare you. All Muslims do not slit throats chanting Allah uakbar ( Alan's snackbar)
It is not a slur against Muslims at all. Just terrorists who use islam as an excuse to kill.
Please don't link terrorism with all Muslims. Islamophobe.
Ah. Sorry. I thought you wanted a debate.It is not a slur against Muslims at all. Just terrorists who use islam as an excuse to kill.
Please don't link terrorism with all Muslims. Islamophobe.
Prick.
Perhaps they've misappropriated the 'God is Great' chant rather like Soccer hooligans took and misused the Union Flag and the Cross of St George?
But then that point could be undermined by the photos the father of the one of model students girls that's gone to Syria at a flag burning protest when 'God is Great' was reportedly chanted?
But then that point could be undermined by the photos the father of the one of model students girls that's gone to Syria at a flag burning protest when 'God is Great' was reportedly chanted?
Nice. You don't want a debate you want to shout and scream it seems.
You are assuming the thread title is against all Muslims. I'm telling you in my opinion it isn't.
You are the one linking all Muslims as terrorists by insisting the thread is against all Muslims. It's specifically aimed at a newspaper story about people going to join Isis
Not all Muslims just those going during Easter. That is offensive to Muslims and me by the way. The story linked does not say all Muslims are going to Iraq does it.
Terrorists should be mocked and terrorism shouldn't be linked to islam. I knw many Muslims and I wouldn't call them snackbars. Unless they expressed a willingness to join Isis. But they wouldn't because they are actually nice people.
You are assuming the thread title is against all Muslims. I'm telling you in my opinion it isn't.
You are the one linking all Muslims as terrorists by insisting the thread is against all Muslims. It's specifically aimed at a newspaper story about people going to join Isis
Not all Muslims just those going during Easter. That is offensive to Muslims and me by the way. The story linked does not say all Muslims are going to Iraq does it.
Terrorists should be mocked and terrorism shouldn't be linked to islam. I knw many Muslims and I wouldn't call them snackbars. Unless they expressed a willingness to join Isis. But they wouldn't because they are actually nice people.
No I didn't I replied saying there is a clear distinction between Muslims and those wanting to join Isis.
Linking all Muslims to terrorism is islamophobic or is ths reveresall day or something.
The story is specifically about people joining Isis the headline is about those people specifically not all Muslims.
There is no sarcasm in any of my posts they are quite clear and it's quite clear you not addressing any of my points. Snipping the top line and ignoring everything else.
I see why you would object to the title if it was talking about Muslims in general but as I dissagree it is against all Muslims I do not understand your objections. That is quite clear and not sarcasm.
Now, next time soebody posts prejudicial language againsts all Muslims well report it to the mods together.
Linking all Muslims to terrorism is islamophobic or is ths reveresall day or something.
The story is specifically about people joining Isis the headline is about those people specifically not all Muslims.
There is no sarcasm in any of my posts they are quite clear and it's quite clear you not addressing any of my points. Snipping the top line and ignoring everything else.
I see why you would object to the title if it was talking about Muslims in general but as I dissagree it is against all Muslims I do not understand your objections. That is quite clear and not sarcasm.
Now, next time soebody posts prejudicial language againsts all Muslims well report it to the mods together.
TTwiggy said:
For me, it's just another nail in the coffin of this place.
PH is dead, I'm in several splinter groups that keep the faith, with a memorable mention in GG on driving too fast at the EVO Triangle, it's over; it's not even at the quality of mumsnet now, these chaps have right biceps far bigger than the other and it's not overuse of their mouse.PH now only has any merit on the single marque forums where the White goods opiniated majority know not what to say as they're surrounded by a knowledgeable tight knit, but friendly, groups.
Killing The Lounge killed this place, I didn't even like it.
PHTV to a group that views cars the same as washing machines is too late - is it too late to save for us that care?
REVOLUTION: "I'm a PHer".
TTwiggy said:
What you posted is clear for everyone to see. Trying to label the only dissenting voice on this thread as islamophobic is frankly pathetic.
You know what you're doing, I know what you're doing, so drop the false outrage.
maybe you are the only dissenting voice because everybody else sees its only aimed at terrorists not Muslims.You know what you're doing, I know what you're doing, so drop the false outrage.
"false outrage" interesting. all im doing is pointing out why your offence is misplaced. ive said why i think you are wrong, you havn't said what is wrong in my posts.
any particular points ive made you object to? please do in case im having a logic fail here. ready to be corrected.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff