Fire in London

Author
Discussion

stripy7

806 posts

187 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Ha! Building pitch black, Happy Easter.

kev1974

4,029 posts

129 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Still burning in parts according to London Fire Brigade.
http://www.london-fire.gov.uk/LatestIncidentsConta...

Went past this morning and there was still a tonne of smoke belching out of manholes, and not manholes that were right next to each other either, they were in side streets off of Kingsway, so it clearly isn't a small and contained fire. So given the amount of smoke that was pouring out this morning I doubt anyone's even been in to survey the damage yet so it isn't going to get fixed any time soon.

Absolute traffic gridlock chaos all around, what happened to the police, when did they stop doing basic traffic management to keep people from blocking junctions as best as possible. They were plenty of them there at Kingsway but all just standing chatting to each other rather than doing anything useful.

arp1

583 posts

127 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Glad london Fire brigade handled this really well, especially with all the savage cuts that boris has implemented! Good job guys and girls!

kev1974

4,029 posts

129 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
arp1 said:
Glad london Fire brigade handled this really well, especially with all the savage cuts that boris has implemented! Good job guys and girls!
??? you could also say that Boris' "savage cuts" have been vindicated, given that LFB still coped with both this and a massive fire in Park Royal at the same time. There clearly was excess fat to be cut before, given they're still coping fine.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
For the real insight, as always..........


http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/environment/eve...

arp1

583 posts

127 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
kev1974 said:
arp1 said:
Glad london Fire brigade handled this really well, especially with all the savage cuts that boris has implemented! Good job guys and girls!
??? you could also say that Boris' "savage cuts" have been vindicated, given that LFB still coped with both this and a massive fire in Park Royal at the same time. There clearly was excess fat to be cut before, given they're still coping fine.
There has been savage cuts, and fewer fire stations and appliances means lives will be lost. It's all down to numbers. The fire service is an ainsurance policy everyone needs and it's been cut to the bone and then some! It will come and bite them in the bum...

onyx39

11,123 posts

150 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
arp1 said:
kev1974 said:
arp1 said:
Glad london Fire brigade handled this really well, especially with all the savage cuts that boris has implemented! Good job guys and girls!
??? you could also say that Boris' "savage cuts" have been vindicated, given that LFB still coped with both this and a massive fire in Park Royal at the same time. There clearly was excess fat to be cut before, given they're still coping fine.
There has been savage cuts, and fewer fire stations and appliances means lives will be lost. It's all down to numbers. The fire service is an ainsurance policy everyone needs and it's been cut to the bone and then some! It will come and bite them in the bum...
In your opinion.
Yes we do need the LFB, obviously.
But, if we can live with a reduced and therefore cheaper LFB, then why shouldn't we?
Presumably the people that make these decisions would have thought it through, and made the cuts where they are the least likely to cause harm.
Boris didn't just phone up the head of LFB one day and say, I want you to close Soho (for example) fire station did he?
He said, you need to save x pounds, go away and do your homework.
Have most of the recent FBU strikes been over Pensions etc? No (or very little) mention of danger to Job Public.
I am guessing you work for LFB ARP?

arp1

583 posts

127 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
I don't, but you have seen with this government the savage cuts to the nhs, police, fire and ambulance services, giving the public a far lesser service and more cuts are to come. Would you be happy seeing bangers of cop cars running around? Firefighters using old equipment, the ambulance service prioritising (even more so) calls... It's the public that suffers. So hats off to the London emergency services for bringing yesterday's incident to a successful conclusion.

onyx39

11,123 posts

150 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
arp1 said:
hats off to the London emergency services for bringing yesterday's incident to a successful conclusion.
Agreed.

DJFish

5,921 posts

263 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
They do a fantastic job but, for the sake of accuracy, it ain't over yet.
My understanding is that the fire is still burning underground, our place is shut until Wednesday but that could just be people wanting a nice long weekend.
On the subject of cuts, every business has to evolve, but surely the dense concentration of people and potential for loss of life and revenue caused by a big incident in any city should be a good reason for having 'spare capacity' in the system?

LordGrover

33,539 posts

212 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
In your opinion.
Yes we do need the LFB, obviously.
But, if we can live with a reduced and therefore cheaper LFB, then why shouldn't we?
Presumably the people that make these decisions would have thought it through, and made the cuts where they are the least likely to cause harm.
Boris didn't just phone up the head of LFB one day and say, I want you to close Soho (for example) fire station did he?
He said, you need to save x pounds, go away and do your homework.
Have most of the recent FBU strikes been over Pensions etc? No (or very little) mention of danger to Job Public.
I am guessing you work for LFB ARP?
I suspect Boris and most politicians would prefer not to make cuts - the issue is the public don't want to pay taxes.
They (we) want our cake and eat it.

arp1

583 posts

127 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Exactly, and there isnt

Munter

31,319 posts

241 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
arp1 said:
Exactly, and there isnt
Define spare capacity? You'll never cope with every event that ever happens. Even if every other person was in the fire service, eventually something will happen that they can't cope with. That's just the nature of the world. So a line has to be drawn somewhere about what we will plan to cope with, and what we accept we cannot.

Throw in the after effects of socialism, and the associated lack of money to pay for a fire service. And that line has to be drawn a bit lower and/or efficiencies found to keep it as high as possible.

If you want a fireman, a policeman, and a paramedic on the corner of every street, it'll cost money we simply do not have. There is no good solution to the situation the country is in. It's going to be tough and hard to claw our way out of the hole and cuts to public services are part of it. Or we decide to be like Greece in a few years. I know which I'd sooner do.

If you want more firemen, work harder and get a pay rise so the gov get's more cash to pay for them with.

ruggedscotty

5,626 posts

209 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Putting a metal cover over that hole wouldn't have done much - the air feeding the fire is coming from else where and that hole is basically a flue...

If you had a fire in your house and you blocked the chimney then it wouldn't stop the fire.... basically put.

onyx39

11,123 posts

150 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
Munter said:
arp1 said:
Exactly, and there isnt
Define spare capacity? You'll never cope with every event that ever happens. Even if every other person was in the fire service, eventually something will happen that they can't cope with. That's just the nature of the world. So a line has to be drawn somewhere about what we will plan to cope with, and what we accept we cannot.

Throw in the after effects of socialism, and the associated lack of money to pay for a fire service. And that line has to be drawn a bit lower and/or efficiencies found to keep it as high as possible.

If you want a fireman, a policeman, and a paramedic on the corner of every street, it'll cost money we simply do not have. There is no good solution to the situation the country is in. It's going to be tough and hard to claw our way out of the hole and cuts to public services are part of it. Or we decide to be like Greece in a few years. I know which I'd sooner do.

If you want more firemen, work harder and get a pay rise so the gov get's more cash to pay for them with.
Spot on.
Excellent post.

Camoradi

4,289 posts

256 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
power outage in central London

rest of UK cut off

DJFish

5,921 posts

263 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
In essence I agree, and I'm all for greater efficiency, but in the case of firefighters in particular, there seems to be an argument that because a resource isn't being used it isn't needed.
I'm not sure I agree.
To me it's like saying I don't need to wear a seatbelt because I haven't had an accident in ages.


kev1974

4,029 posts

129 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
ruggedscotty said:
Putting a metal cover over that hole wouldn't have done much - the air feeding the fire is coming from else where and that hole is basically a flue...

If you had a fire in your house and you blocked the chimney then it wouldn't stop the fire.... basically put.
Still burning
https://twitter.com/bexy76/status/5836293631213649...

Latest update from LFB mentions that it's a gas leak that's fuelling it

From what I gather they can't just turn the gas off because it's only the pressure of the gas leaking out of the pipe that keeps the flames where they are. With gas leak fires there is a danger of the the flame travelling back up the reduced gas supply, when the pressure of the gas being leaked starts to drop, and the problem just moving to somewhere else.


oyster

12,595 posts

248 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
arp1 said:
I don't, but you have seen with this government the savage cuts to the nhs
You'll have to help me here.

Can you point to a source that shows how much the NHS budget has been cut by this government?

Just asking, since you claim it to be true.

I'll give you a few days to find the figures.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 2nd April 2015
quotequote all
oyster said:
arp1 said:
I don't, but you have seen with this government the savage cuts to the nhs
You'll have to help me here.

Can you point to a source that shows how much the NHS budget has been cut by this government?

Just asking, since you claim it to be true.

I'll give you a few days to find the figures.
I'm not too worried about the cuts, It's the lack of or where they make the efficiency savings ie front line for political reasons rather than 'cushty management' that bothers me.