Tonight's seven~horse TV debate. Place your bets.

Tonight's seven~horse TV debate. Place your bets.

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
Thorodin said:
While watching the very self-satisfied Nicola, it dawned on me that we are being taken large. It is just possible, even likely, that Alec, realising that he personally riled more Scots voters than any other cause and that it was he that 'lost' the vote, made a pact with Nicola. Alec would strategically withdraw from the pointy end allowing she to take the reins so he could return to prominence if and when SNP became significant in Westminster. Then referendum with impetus.
The one positive that can come out of it

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
vonuber said:
You used the term poofters if I recall (with regards to the EA spreading gay propaganda)?
And?

I did, it was100% accurate. (Actually, i said poofder, singular, specific to the head of the EA)

Next?

Chicken Chaser

7,812 posts

225 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
It's easy to bang the immigrant drum as its emotive and its UKIPs opportunity to withdraw and control borders BUT the big problem with the NHS and all public services, is the drain caused by those who contribute the least but take the most. The large non-working whites who take what they can whilst maintaining poor lifestyles out of choice and not poverty, then expect to get all of the care they need when suffering from diet related illness, respiratory problems etc. I can't be the only one who is disgusted when they see smokers sitting outside of the hospital doors sitting in wheelchairs hooked up to drips.
Take the same bunch who take up more than 50% of police time, making petty complaints because they can't look after themselves. I'm not talking about people genuinely in desperate need.

We need a party who will point that out and address it, not complain that foreigners are our main problem.

MGJohn

Original Poster:

10,203 posts

184 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
Chicken Chaser said:
We need a party who will point that out and address it, not complain that foreigners are our main problem.
Not the main problem but a big problem none the less. Unless it is as you say, specifically addressed, it will only get bigger along with other associated problems. It is something many people are increasingly more angry about and will show that come the GE. On May 7th, I am convinced the Nation will send a largely unexpected hard message to those we have entrusted the Nation's well being to for far too long. Due to their short sighted pc-riddled handling of far too many things they have mainly failed to deliver. Thereby creating many of these self-inflicted problems.

Avidly consume their incessantly positively presented figures and statistics supporting their stance on these things if you desire. I much rather than consume that same old regurgitated stuff, prefer to rely on the evidence of my own ears and eyes.

bad company

18,623 posts

267 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
vonuber said:
bad company said:
Scuffers said:
Bradgate said:
Except they would probably use different terminology to describe homosexuals....
you do talk rubbish!
.
You used the term poofters if I recall (with regards to the EA spreading gay propaganda)?
Not sure who that is directed at but I haven't used that word.

MarkRSi

5,782 posts

219 months

Friday 3rd April 2015
quotequote all
Just watched the first half of the election debate...

Christ, I would normally have given Ed a bit of slack given the slagging off he gets on here, but the stuff coming out his mouth alone was utterly cringe-worthy banghead (and that's before the soul syphoning starting at the camera, gestures etc.). He made whats-her-face-green-leader seems quite reasonable in comparison...

Nick and Cameron weren't too bad, Farage had potential but seemed to focus on immigration/EU a bit much (shame as I like the UKIP). Think the welsh party leader came across better than either of them.

Can see why everyone was raving about Sturgeon today, but I just can't agree with her polices...

I suspect the second half was more of the same?

Edited by MarkRSi on Friday 3rd April 22:50

irocfan

40,513 posts

191 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
MGJohn said:
Chicken Chaser said:
We need a party who will point that out and address it, not complain that foreigners are our main problem.
Not the main problem but a big problem none the less. Unless it is as you say, specifically addressed, it will only get bigger along with other associated problems. It is something many people are increasingly more angry about and will show that come the GE. On May 7th, I am convinced the Nation will send a largely unexpected hard message to those we have entrusted the Nation's well being to for far too long. Due to their short sighted pc-riddled handling of far too many things they have mainly failed to deliver. Thereby creating many of these self-inflicted problems.

Avidly consume their incessantly positively presented figures and statistics supporting their stance on these things if you desire. I much rather than consume that same old regurgitated stuff, prefer to rely on the evidence of my own ears and eyes.
dude if you're hinting that UKIP will have a large increase in MPs I guarantee you that they won't. I'll go as far as to say if they get 10 seats it will be the biggest shock since Churchill lost the '45 election - probably bigger. In fact if they even double their current number it would count a resounding success. If we're desperately unlucky the greenies will get 1 extra possibly 2. The 2 big boys will again dominate

MGJohn

Original Poster:

10,203 posts

184 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
irocfan said:
MGJohn said:
Chicken Chaser said:
We need a party who will point that out and address it, not complain that foreigners are our main problem.
Not the main problem but a big problem none the less. Unless it is as you say, specifically addressed, it will only get bigger along with other associated problems. It is something many people are increasingly more angry about and will show that come the GE. On May 7th, I am convinced the Nation will send a largely unexpected hard message to those we have entrusted the Nation's well being to for far too long. Due to their short sighted pc-riddled handling of far too many things they have mainly failed to deliver. Thereby creating many of these self-inflicted problems.

Avidly consume their incessantly positively presented figures and statistics supporting their stance on these things if you desire. I much rather than consume that same old regurgitated stuff, prefer to rely on the evidence of my own ears and eyes.
dude if you're hinting that UKIP will have a large increase in MPs I guarantee you that they won't. I'll go as far as to say if they get 10 seats it will be the biggest shock since Churchill lost the '45 election - probably bigger. In fact if they even double their current number it would count a resounding success. If we're desperately unlucky the greenies will get 1 extra possibly 2. The 2 big boys will again dominate
I did not hint that. The message will still be there though.

Sadly dood, your closing remark no doubt will be 100% accurate.

Mr Whippy

29,055 posts

242 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Chicken Chaser said:
It's easy to bang the immigrant drum as its emotive and its UKIPs opportunity to withdraw and control borders BUT the big problem with the NHS and all public services, is the drain caused by those who contribute the least but take the most. The large non-working whites who take what they can whilst maintaining poor lifestyles out of choice and not poverty, then expect to get all of the care they need when suffering from diet related illness, respiratory problems etc. I can't be the only one who is disgusted when they see smokers sitting outside of the hospital doors sitting in wheelchairs hooked up to drips.
Take the same bunch who take up more than 50% of police time, making petty complaints because they can't look after themselves. I'm not talking about people genuinely in desperate need.

We need a party who will point that out and address it, not complain that foreigners are our main problem.
I agree, but the thing with domestic piss takers is they have a vote, but they also have money in savings, pensions, and income... so in the future they CAN pay for their excessive health care needs... not to mention they've probably paid in for their entire lives up until that point so are somewhat entitled to this care, albeit a bit wasteful and silly to provide.

A recent heath care seeking immigrant on the other hand can't provide any return for their care either in the short or longer terms.


Immigration is clearly a hot potato because our EU membership means no control... and immigration in potentially even higher numbers WILL impact the UK infrastructure. And at a time when we have public service cuts, that simply accelerates degradation of services for everyone.


As Farage said, if Greece folds, and people already travel through all the other 'free travel' countries of Italy, France, Germany, Spain etc to get to the UK, then a LOT more people will be coming to the UK as the poorer EU countries falter and potentially fail.

The EU project is doomed to failure at this point... to leave our borders wide open to the aftermath would be bonkers!

RYH64E

7,960 posts

245 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
I agree, but the thing with domestic piss takers is they have a vote, but they also have money in savings, pensions, and income... so in the future they CAN pay for their excessive health care needs... not to mention they've probably paid in for their entire lives up until that point so are somewhat entitled to this care, albeit a bit wasteful and silly to provide.
You would probably be surprised how many working people have no money, no savings, no assets and no pension. Listening to some of the people at work talking about their finances is scary, when they say they're got no money they mean just that, nothing.

Chicken Chaser

7,812 posts

225 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
I agree, but the thing with domestic piss takers is they have a vote, but they also have money in savings, pensions, and income... so in the future they CAN pay for their excessive health care needs... not to mention they've probably paid in for their entire lives up until that point so are somewhat entitled to this care, albeit a bit wasteful and silly to provide.

A recent heath care seeking immigrant on the other hand can't provide any return for their care either in the short or longer terms.


Immigration is clearly a hot potato because our EU membership means no control... and immigration in potentially even higher numbers WILL impact the UK infrastructure. And at a time when we have public service cuts, that simply accelerates degradation of services for everyone.


As Farage said, if Greece folds, and people already travel through all the other 'free travel' countries of Italy, France, Germany, Spain etc to get to the UK, then a LOT more people will be coming to the UK as the poorer EU countries falter and potentially fail.

The EU project is doomed to failure at this point... to leave our borders wide open to the aftermath would be bonkers!
You're talking about the middle class with poor lifestyles. I'm talking about the feckless underclass which out breeds your average working/lower middle. They have no income, no savings and yet still expect the state to provide them with enough money for 20 a day, alcohol and a 50 inch TV with sky in their rent free council houses. There are too many of them who generation after generation have taken without giving anything. They know no different.

MGJohn

Original Poster:

10,203 posts

184 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Chicken Chaser said:
Mr Whippy said:
The EU project is doomed to failure .......
You're talking about the middle class with poor lifestyles. I'm talking about the feckless underclass which out breeds your average working/lower middle. They have no income, no savings and yet still expect the state to provide them with enough money for 20 a day, alcohol and a 50 inch TV with sky in their rent free council houses. There are too many of them who generation after generation have taken without giving anything. They know no different.
Much the way I see things. Have I got it wrong?

Maybe over the years, the Two Eds outfit have deliberately supported that state funded "out breeding class" who if they bother to vote, have bred more Labour voters... Stands to reason ... Bonus. Figures ? ... or, not.

The Government and not the taxpayer will always provide... yeah ... right.

All so very depressing and come May 7th, will that depression lift? ... Fat chance .. frown

MGJohn

Original Poster:

10,203 posts

184 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
RYH64E said:
Mr Whippy said:
I agree, but the thing with domestic piss takers is they have a vote, but they also have money in savings, pensions, and income... so in the future they CAN pay for their excessive health care needs... not to mention they've probably paid in for their entire lives up until that point so are somewhat entitled to this care, albeit a bit wasteful and silly to provide.
You would probably be surprised how many working people have no money, no savings, no assets and no pension. Listening to some of the people at work talking about their finances is scary, when they say they're got no money they mean just that, nothing.
I wouldn't be surprised. Not now. Tell you why.

Yes, just like you, until I retired a few years ago, I was sometimes surprised to hear colleagues discussing their personal finance problems. Mind you, they somehow managed to have a newish BMW on near crippling monthly payment schemes and at least one foreign holiday each year. Always ran out of money by week three each month.

Even career professionals would be in trouble if an unexpected bill for merely a few hundred cropped up. Nice car they didn't really need and holidays each year though.

Then some accuse me of being lucky having paid off a once hefty mortgage and I actually own my cars. Yeah ... pure luck.

Sargeant Orange

2,716 posts

148 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
MGJohn said:
RYH64E said:
Mr Whippy said:
I agree, but the thing with domestic piss takers is they have a vote, but they also have money in savings, pensions, and income... so in the future they CAN pay for their excessive health care needs... not to mention they've probably paid in for their entire lives up until that point so are somewhat entitled to this care, albeit a bit wasteful and silly to provide.
You would probably be surprised how many working people have no money, no savings, no assets and no pension. Listening to some of the people at work talking about their finances is scary, when they say they're got no money they mean just that, nothing.
I wouldn't be surprised. Not now. Tell you why.

Yes, just like you, until I retired a few years ago, I was sometimes surprised to hear colleagues discussing their personal finance problems. Mind you, they somehow managed to have a newish BMW on near crippling monthly payment schemes and at least one foreign holiday each year. Always ran out of money by week three each month.

Even career professionals would be in trouble if an unexpected bill for merely a few hundred cropped up. Nice car they didn't really need and holidays each year though.

Then some accuse me of being lucky having paid off a once hefty mortgage and I actually own my cars. Yeah ... pure luck.
Yes I see some of those, but the vast majority that speak to me are running a 12 year old Fiesta & ploughing all their cash into ever increasing rents. Ok, you could probably look at half of them and point to mistakes in their past which have caused them these money problems, but let's not pretend all of them are running around in a financed German saloon

JensenA

5,671 posts

231 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
Chicken Chaser said:
You're talking about the middle class with poor lifestyles. I'm talking about the feckless underclass which out breeds your average working/lower middle. They have no income, no savings and yet still expect the state to provide them with enough money for 20 a day, alcohol and a 50 inch TV with sky in their rent free council houses. There are too many of them who generation after generation have taken without giving anything. They know no different.
Yes it's annoying, but in actual fact they represent a very small minority. The reality is that about half of the UK population receive more from that state, than they put into it by taxation.


mikebradford

2,522 posts

146 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
JensenA said:
Yes it's annoying, but in actual fact they represent a very small minority. The reality is that about half of the UK population receive more from that state, than they put into it by taxation.
If that is true id be intrested to see how
And where the data is from

I accept the generalised comment that this was a response to


RYH64E

7,960 posts

245 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
MGJohn said:
Even career professionals would be in trouble if an unexpected bill for merely a few hundred cropped up. Nice car they didn't really need and holidays each year though.
Within reason, income appears to have little effect on savings levels. I know plenty of people with substantial incomes and apparently affluent lifestyles who've got nothing left at the end of the month and nothing in the bank, I also know people with very modest incomes who've managed to build up a decent amount of savings.

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

184 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
RYH64E said:
MGJohn said:
Even career professionals would be in trouble if an unexpected bill for merely a few hundred cropped up. Nice car they didn't really need and holidays each year though.
Within reason, income appears to have little effect on savings levels. I know plenty of people with substantial incomes and apparently affluent lifestyles who've got nothing left at the end of the month and nothing in the bank, I also know people with very modest incomes who've managed to build up a decent amount of savings.
Exactly, it's all a balancing act, and called living within your means.

Might be an old fashioned statement, but it's as true today as it always was. It's a shame a lot of people can't seem to adhere to it. They'd rather rent the latest shiny shiny German derv on the never never, and 60" TVs, iProducts and other crapola they just don't need.

Very depressing frown

NicD

3,281 posts

258 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
V88Dicky said:
RYH64E said:
MGJohn said:
Even career professionals would be in trouble if an unexpected bill for merely a few hundred cropped up. Nice car they didn't really need and holidays each year though.
Within reason, income appears to have little effect on savings levels. I know plenty of people with substantial incomes and apparently affluent lifestyles who've got nothing left at the end of the month and nothing in the bank, I also know people with very modest incomes who've managed to build up a decent amount of savings.
Exactly, it's all a balancing act, and called living within your means.

Might be an old fashioned statement, but it's as true today as it always was. It's a shame a lot of people can't seem to adhere to it. They'd rather rent the latest shiny shiny German derv on the never never, and 60" TVs, iProducts and other crapola they just don't need.

Very depressing frown
Just to balance this, some (many?) people have substantial assets, and its crazy to take to them the grave, or leave all to the kids.
So those needlessly scrimping and saving should spend more, while those living beyond their means should spend less.
With the new pension freedom, we will see more spending.

RichB

51,595 posts

285 months

Saturday 4th April 2015
quotequote all
NicD said:
Just to balance this, some (many?) people have substantial assets, and its crazy to take to them the grave, or leave all to the kids. <clip?>
OOI why is it crazy to leave assets to one's children? Surely that's a personal decision.