Robbery in London - 300 deposit boxes

Robbery in London - 300 deposit boxes

Author
Discussion

Mr Trophy

Original Poster:

6,808 posts

204 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Love how the pictures are on here before the news hehe

soad

32,903 posts

177 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all







AreOut

3,658 posts

162 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
"please do not smoke in the vault", now I can totally imagine them taking selfie there with a cigarette smile

soad

32,903 posts

177 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
AreOut said:
"please do not smoke in the vault", now I can totally imagine them taking selfie there with a cigarette smile
nono GPS tracking. No cellphones allowed (on the job), surely? redcard

stripy7

806 posts

188 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Am I being dense here but Id assumed they had stitch drilled a crawl hole. If they could open the vault door then why bother drilling? Looks like they only had limited access to boxes directly in front of their core holes. Given how easy drilling that wall is, given the minimal reinforcement, it looks like a very targeted attack on a specific box. (waits to be shot down in flames).

IIIRestorerIII

842 posts

229 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
stripy7 said:
Am I being dense here but Id assumed they had stitch drilled a crawl hole. If they could open the vault door then why bother drilling? Looks like they only had limited access to boxes directly in front of their core holes. Given how easy drilling that wall is, given the minimal reinforcement, it looks like a very targeted attack on a specific box. (waits to be shot down in flames).
They got in through the drilled hole. Police picture from inside the vault is with the safe door open?

stripy7

806 posts

188 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
IIIRestorerIII said:
They got in through the drilled hole. Police picture from inside the vault is with the safe door open?
looks like 300mm diameter cores, guess that's possible, given you only need width of shoulders. They wouldn't bother wasting time with the door then.

Edited by stripy7 on Wednesday 22 April 13:49

Fatboy

7,981 posts

273 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Am I wrong in thinking that there doesn't appear to be any rebar visible in that core - I'd have thought that the vault wall would be full of it?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
WCZ said:
drilling 2 meters of concrete with a hilti DD would make st loads of noise and need loads of drill bits - especially considering they needed to create a crawl hole.

absolutely nuts!
I don't believe they went though 2M of wall, I think that's just press bullsh*t.

if you look at the old film from when it was opened, the wall thickness asides the door don't look anything like 2M, more like 3-4 feet.

drill wise, that's a bit drill, and apparently they had two of them, I have seen smaller ones of those go through 12" reinforced concrete including RSJ's in minutes.

Only issue I can see is they would have had to do it in at least 3 'steps'
so we were right, the 6-7 feet of concrete story was total bull, 50Cm is naff all

looks like they had a 500+mm long core drill and just went through in one go (3 times)

doubt that took very long with a quality core drill cutter, maybe a couple of hours...


stripy7

806 posts

188 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all

As an aside I've encountered metal safes which incorporated arsenic pellets/ other nasties in their side walls intended to be released when they are cut up.

Edited by stripy7 on Wednesday 22 April 14:38

stripy7

806 posts

188 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Fatboy said:
Am I wrong in thinking that there doesn't appear to be any rebar visible in that core - I'd have thought that the vault wall would be full of it?
There are a couple of bars visible towards the Vault interior, horizontal reinforcement would have slowed the drilling down considerably as would anything, if it caught the cutter along its length.



Edited by stripy7 on Wednesday 22 April 14:54

Muncher

12,219 posts

250 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
There isn't an awful lot of steel in that concrete whichever way you look at it. I think the problem is drilling technology has moved on quite a long way since these safes were built and can be breached quite easily. Some kind of anti-drilling compound in there would be useful, some kind of fibres or mesh that would cause friction to the drill bit would be useful, it doesn't take a lot of friction to stop a core bit.

kev1974

4,029 posts

130 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
doesn't look like the place has had any kind of upgrade or refurb work in decades! Even the no smoking signs are from the 80s. Not surprised that they hadn't spent any money on decent CCTV or alarms.

Foppo

2,344 posts

125 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Muncher said:
There isn't an awful lot of steel in that concrete whichever way you look at it. I think the problem is drilling technology has moved on quite a long way since these safes were built and can be breached quite easily. Some kind of anti-drilling compound in there would be useful, some kind of fibres or mesh that would cause friction to the drill bit would be useful, it doesn't take a lot of friction to stop a core bit.
The mechanics of doing this job not that difficult.Having the guts to do it and not being to greedy is the art.They only took so many boxes.I don't condone thieving but job was professionally done.


Edited by Foppo on Wednesday 22 April 19:20

Vaud

50,572 posts

156 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Surely the main issue is the alarms / vibration sensors, rather than the thickness of the walls? Doesn't matter if it took 1,2 or 8 hrs to cut through it, if the alarms were both working and responded to then it's not an issue.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Vaud said:
Surely the main issue is the alarms / vibration sensors, rather than the thickness of the walls? Doesn't matter if it took 1,2 or 8 hrs to cut through it, if the alarms were both working and responded to then it's not an issue.
Alarm went off, pc plod ignored it.

Vaud

50,572 posts

156 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
Alarm went off, pc plod ignored it.
That was kind of my point. All of these pics are a bit of a distraction.

Oakey

27,591 posts

217 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
Is that right what they just said on ITN news, that the boxes targeted only belong to six people?

It looks like they were after something specific? Especially if, going by the published timeline, they were gone by the Sunday morning (because after going to all that trouble why wouldn't you spend the extra time opening as many boxes as you could if you know nobody will realise until Tuesday?).

Vaud

50,572 posts

156 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
How odd. Why wouldn't you get the rest for the sake of a few hours given to have done the difficult bit?

Oakey

27,591 posts

217 months

Wednesday 22nd April 2015
quotequote all
I may have misheard, the Telegraph says they've only been unable to contact six owners of boxes that were opened.