Who will be the new Labour leader?
Poll: Who will be the new Labour leader?
Total Members Polled: 378
Discussion
Stickyfinger said:
Even if he is mad as a hatter, I did think Corbyn had some level of education and inelegance....I would not give that woman a lollop to suck let alone a fking Job !
Jezza really is a total tt if that is his reality and level.
There was no one else left after he appointed the tea lady as Shadow Minister of Justice.Jezza really is a total tt if that is his reality and level.
turbobloke said:
edh said:
turbobloke said:
Claims that it's mere coincidence are also highly debatable. The Labour core vote does indeed rest now around the former coalfields and the London communist borough republics. There may never be logical proof but the case is well enough made for 'balance of probabilitites' to apply. Combined with upcoming boundary changes, Corbyn's challenge is immense and a red letter day in 2020 is most unlikely.
Still don't buy it..No coalfields in Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds/Bradford for example, although some in Lancs in between Manchester & Liverpool. Yorkshire coalfields to the East & South of Leeds/Bradford I think.
Even so the agreement doesn't have to offer perfection to exist. I did take the obvious step of adding the communist London borough republics, in so doing I acknowledged already that the agreement is good but not perfect.
edh said:
Agree that winning in 2020 will be very tough, particularly with the changes to electoral roll & fiddling with constituencies.
gothatway said:
TankRizzo said:
Diane Abbott is Communities Secretary
Now that is the worst news so far from this debacle. Am I alone in not only despising that woman's politics but also finding her attitude and demeanour to be incredibly patronising ?jsf said:
turbobloke said:
edh said:
turbobloke said:
Claims that it's mere coincidence are also highly debatable. The Labour core vote does indeed rest now around the former coalfields and the London communist borough republics. There may never be logical proof but the case is well enough made for 'balance of probabilitites' to apply. Combined with upcoming boundary changes, Corbyn's challenge is immense and a red letter day in 2020 is most unlikely.
Still don't buy it..No coalfields in Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds/Bradford for example, although some in Lancs in between Manchester & Liverpool. Yorkshire coalfields to the East & South of Leeds/Bradford I think.
Even so the agreement doesn't have to offer perfection to exist. I did take the obvious step of adding the communist London borough republics, in so doing I acknowledged already that the agreement is good but not perfect.
edh said:
Agree that winning in 2020 will be very tough, particularly with the changes to electoral roll & fiddling with constituencies.
I know kids once went down the mines, but not at that point in time.
jsf said:
dandarez said:
Link please to prove Corbyn has given Abbott a job.
http://order-order.com/2015/09/13/corbyns-shadow-cabinet/#:gKARmDpm2wpQuA◾Diane Abbott shadow minister for international development
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34240869
REALIST123 said:
jsf said:
dandarez said:
Link please to prove Corbyn has given Abbott a job.
http://order-order.com/2015/09/13/corbyns-shadow-cabinet/#:gKARmDpm2wpQuAEveryone else appointing to top level jobs publishes JDs and PSs and holds interviews alongside use of other selection instruments. Picking people other than from evidence around selection criteria i.e. trying as hard as you can to see who's the best at doing the job is essentially setting out to ensure that a decent measure of incompetence is harnessed - that's politics.
CorbynFTW said:
Burnham = Home Sec
H Benn = Foreign Sec
Burnham has lost any remaining self-respect I think........ the guy is clearly desperate for power. H Benn = Foreign Sec
I think Corbyn is going to be attacked now for not having one single woman in a top end job..... although in fairness his problem may have been that all the women capable of a top line job refused to serve rather than him refusing to offer..... but either way it appears like he has given the women junior jobs only.
And John McDonnell as shadow treasury..... not a conciliatory appointment at all and bound to backfire with the amount of "controversial" quotes the media can dig up on him over the years.
cirian75 said:
It would be interesting to see what the result would have been minus the £3 voters
He still would have won but with a less convincing margin. He smashed the vote in all categories - full members, affiliated and £3 registered supporters. That is the main reason it will be so hard for them to get rid of him quickly. They will have to wait it out. Can you imagine if he decides to campaign for an out vote on the EU referendum? - The whole political establishment on all sides will go into melt down.
http://www.labour.org.uk/blog/entry/results-of-the...
VolvoT5 said:
CorbynFTW said:
Burnham = Home Sec
H Benn = Foreign Sec
Burnham has lost any remaining self-respect I think........ the guy is clearly desperate for power. H Benn = Foreign Sec
I think Corbyn is going to be attacked now for not having one single woman in a top end job..... although in fairness his problem may have been that all the women capable of a top line job refused to serve rather than him refusing to offer..... but either way it appears like he has given the women junior jobs only.
And John McDonnell as shadow treasury..... not a conciliatory appointment at all and bound to backfire with the amount of "controversial" quotes the media can dig up on him over the years.
techiedave said:
BBC are listing :
?Diane Abbott shadow minister for international development
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34240869
Sorry, the communities thing was straight off the Sky News live feed so they must have ballsed it up.?Diane Abbott shadow minister for international development
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34240869
dandarez said:
jsf said:
turbobloke said:
edh said:
turbobloke said:
Claims that it's mere coincidence are also highly debatable. The Labour core vote does indeed rest now around the former coalfields and the London communist borough republics. There may never be logical proof but the case is well enough made for 'balance of probabilitites' to apply. Combined with upcoming boundary changes, Corbyn's challenge is immense and a red letter day in 2020 is most unlikely.
Still don't buy it..No coalfields in Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds/Bradford for example, although some in Lancs in between Manchester & Liverpool. Yorkshire coalfields to the East & South of Leeds/Bradford I think.
Even so the agreement doesn't have to offer perfection to exist. I did take the obvious step of adding the communist London borough republics, in so doing I acknowledged already that the agreement is good but not perfect.
edh said:
Agree that winning in 2020 will be very tough, particularly with the changes to electoral roll & fiddling with constituencies.
I know kids once went down the mines, but not at that point in time.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff