Who will be the new Labour leader?
Poll: Who will be the new Labour leader?
Total Members Polled: 378
Discussion
turbobloke said:
Totally understood, it was an opportunity to mention that Lucas has not and will not have any responsibility for energy, which is quite reassuring even in the typing of it!
Would be/could be as worried by the similar likelihood of the sun going supernova if you had to type that ?Edited by Stickyfinger on Monday 14th September 12:03
turbobloke said:
tim0409 said:
There is a rumour on twitter that Caroline Lucas may be offered a position in the shadow cabinet with responsibility for energy. Now that would be interesting....
If so and fortunately for everyone else she'd actually have no responsibility at all for energy, but those that have it are little better.But yes, interesting! He needs more non-London women apparently.
Stickyfinger said:
turbobloke said:
Totally understood, it was an opportunity to mention that Lucas has not and will not have any responsibility for energy, which is quite reassuring even in the typing of it!
You would be/could be as worried by the similar likelihood of the sun going supernova if you had to type that ?The physics of the Sun is what it is, Lucas is what she is, and both elicit different responses as totally different entities. The Sun will be an adequate primary energy supplier for the foreseeable future as a main sequence star, whereas Lucas could provide inadequate energy supplies to home and businesses in terms of gas and electrical energy, as a deluded green-red politician who believes in nonscience.
That's that cleared up
turbobloke said:
No, the Sun will never go supernova (its mass is too low as you will appreciate) but Lucas is a politician and could conceivably end up, no matter how remote the chances, with responsibility for energy.
The physics of the Sun is what it is, Lucas is what she is, and both elicit different responses as totally different entities. The Sun will be an adequate primary energy supplier for the foreseeable future as a main sequence star, whereas Lucas could provide inadequate energy supplies to home and businesses in terms of gas and electrical energy, as a deluded green-red politician who believes in nonscience.
That's that cleared up
LOLThe physics of the Sun is what it is, Lucas is what she is, and both elicit different responses as totally different entities. The Sun will be an adequate primary energy supplier for the foreseeable future as a main sequence star, whereas Lucas could provide inadequate energy supplies to home and businesses in terms of gas and electrical energy, as a deluded green-red politician who believes in nonscience.
That's that cleared up
turbobloke said:
The Sun will be an adequate primary energy supplier for the foreseeable future
Best nationalise it thenStickyfinger said:
turbobloke said:
No, the Sun will never go supernova (its mass is too low as you will appreciate) but Lucas is a politician and could conceivably end up, no matter how remote the chances, with responsibility for energy.
The physics of the Sun is what it is, Lucas is what she is, and both elicit different responses as totally different entities. The Sun will be an adequate primary energy supplier for the foreseeable future as a main sequence star, whereas Lucas could provide inadequate energy supplies to homes and businesses in terms of gas and electrical energy, as a deluded green-red politician who believes in nonscience.
That's that cleared up
LOLThe physics of the Sun is what it is, Lucas is what she is, and both elicit different responses as totally different entities. The Sun will be an adequate primary energy supplier for the foreseeable future as a main sequence star, whereas Lucas could provide inadequate energy supplies to homes and businesses in terms of gas and electrical energy, as a deluded green-red politician who believes in nonscience.
That's that cleared up
turbobloke said:
The Sun will be an adequate primary energy supplier for the foreseeable future
Best nationalise it thenHas anyone tested the PH hamsters for the presence of Corbynite?
But who is Chrise???? 
Justayellowbadge said:
tim0409 said:
There is a rumour on twitter that Caroline Lucas may be offered a position in the shadow cabinet with responsibility for energy. Now that would be interesting....
Even they couldn't be that stupid? Alex said:
With Corbyn's views on such topics as the IRA, the Army and the Falklands, he's going to lose former Labour voters to UKIP.
And his shadow chancellor thinks the IRA were heros.That might have played well with a few London councils in the old loony left days but they wont like that in the working men's clubs.
Alex said:
Reminds me of an old Bernard Manning gag:
"I'd like you all to give a round of applause for this young man who fought in the Falklands."
(Loud cheering and clapping)
"He's from Argentina..."
I think I'd still applaud, those poor f"I'd like you all to give a round of applause for this young man who fought in the Falklands."
(Loud cheering and clapping)
"He's from Argentina..."
kers were no less sold down the river than our guys.
Vaud said:
I agree.
They were soldiers, sent to fight. They were ill equipped, sent on a political mission and died on a cold island.
Why? For a vanity mission by their leader, not because of some imminent threat to Argentina.
(way off thread topic)
This, I'm surprised the previous poster had to ask.They were soldiers, sent to fight. They were ill equipped, sent on a political mission and died on a cold island.
Why? For a vanity mission by their leader, not because of some imminent threat to Argentina.
(way off thread topic)
Einion Yrth said:
Vaud said:
I agree.
They were soldiers, sent to fight. They were ill equipped, sent on a political mission and died on a cold island.
Why? For a vanity mission by their leader, not because of some imminent threat to Argentina.
(way off thread topic)
This, I'm surprised the previous poster had to ask.They were soldiers, sent to fight. They were ill equipped, sent on a political mission and died on a cold island.
Why? For a vanity mission by their leader, not because of some imminent threat to Argentina.
(way off thread topic)
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff