Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 7
Discussion
Strocky said:
Big Rod said:
So what's your point?
You wrote...
"however the difference would be that at least the majority of my fellow citizens would be represented by the party they voted for"
...Which is simply not true. The figures, (facts if you will), tell a different story.
You just carry on posting pretty pictures up by way of a response, there's a good boy.
Leaving aside the fact that more voters in Scotland voted SNP than Labour/Tory/Lib-Dem (you know those parties that turn up in that big old building in that London and run the country) COMBINED in the last GE as per your Wiki Link, I'm assuming your pedantry is aware of the flaws of the FPTP system in regards to UK democracyYou wrote...
"however the difference would be that at least the majority of my fellow citizens would be represented by the party they voted for"
...Which is simply not true. The figures, (facts if you will), tell a different story.
You just carry on posting pretty pictures up by way of a response, there's a good boy.
Big Rod said:
Strocky said:
NoNeed said:
If the SNP really cared about foodbanks they would waste so much money on other st and vanity projects.
The SNP don't care for foodbanks, they're a direct result of the poverty (for both the unemployed and in-work) due to falling welfare funding & low work pay caused directly by Westminster's decision makingJustayellowbadge said:
Strocky said:
Re-read your post and let the stupidity seep in
Pithy, but what exactly are you trying to say? You argument evaporated when you said the SNP were a 'means to an end' - an attempt to distance yourself from their politics while still supporting their aim. 'Defending the indefensible' was the term I used, and that was eventually your clumsy response.
The question I put to you now - is a "generation" of SNP policy such as stealth ID databases, reduced college and university places, fewer teachers, unified and unaccountable police force, reduced NHS spending, botched stamp-duty reform and a squeeze on local authority spending thanks to a council tax freeze intended to be temporary but now a ticking time bomb, and more of the same a worthwhile price to pay for independence?
Edited by r11co on Wednesday 26th August 12:53
Strocky said:
That you don't know the difference between a region and a country with it's own distinct legal system
It would appear that you don't either. Scotland fails most commonly accepted tests as to what constitutes a country (Montevideo convention, declared statehood, recognised statehood, absolute sovereignty, control of economy and money supply). It passes some tests. But those tests are negated by failing others. Sorry Scotland is a region. Just like England. It used to be a country.
Strocky said:
IainT said:
UK politics is centrist. Scotland is centre-left as are large swathes of England although more centre-right across the whole country. Comparing Scotland to England and declaring political incompatibility is typically short-sited and deep rooted in the nationalist divisive agenda to seek differences rather than consensus. The variations between parts of England are far wider.
We do need a better, more regional system where votes count no matter what the majority of your neighbours vote for. What you have now is an unprecedented level of representation in the UK parliament, total representation i all devolved matters - you can't for a second seriously think having no opposition to the SNP in the Scottish Parliament is a good thing? 50% of the vote in Scotland for 95% of the seats is hardly fair nor representative of the slight majority that didn't vote SNP (50.03% didn't vote SNP in Scotland).
Using the last GE as an example of England forcing a Tory government on the country - it was far more a case of Labour forfeiting a say by giving up the centre ground. A move they're seemingly keen to continue with.
My suggestion is keep the union, move to a federal system with regions, broadly equivalent on some factor - population makes obvious sense. Move election to PR and make voting mandatory. Offer a 'none of the above, they're all wasters' option on all ballots.
I don't want the SNP to have an absolute majority in Holyrood, I'd prefer a coalition with the Greens/Lib Dems to help reign in the SNP's more nanny state policiesWe do need a better, more regional system where votes count no matter what the majority of your neighbours vote for. What you have now is an unprecedented level of representation in the UK parliament, total representation i all devolved matters - you can't for a second seriously think having no opposition to the SNP in the Scottish Parliament is a good thing? 50% of the vote in Scotland for 95% of the seats is hardly fair nor representative of the slight majority that didn't vote SNP (50.03% didn't vote SNP in Scotland).
Using the last GE as an example of England forcing a Tory government on the country - it was far more a case of Labour forfeiting a say by giving up the centre ground. A move they're seemingly keen to continue with.
My suggestion is keep the union, move to a federal system with regions, broadly equivalent on some factor - population makes obvious sense. Move election to PR and make voting mandatory. Offer a 'none of the above, they're all wasters' option on all ballots.
I could live with your version of a federal government if you throw in disbanding the Royal Family, the House of Lords and let Portsmouth take a shot of housing Trident for a few years
r11co said:
Are you telling me that Rupert Murdoch is neither Right wing nor morally reprehensible, or that the public records of Alex Salmond's meetings with him are false?
You used a very weak argument to justify Labour going into bed en-masse with very unsavoury characters to "save the Union"As a Labour supporter I'd have thought you would'nt want to bring too much attention to old Rupert
NoNeed said:
o it is a group of countries bound together by treaties, one of which is the UK of where Scotland is one of its regions.
The UK's Office for National Statistics, uses "country" to describe England, Scotland and Wales.[5] Northern Ireland, in contrast, is described as a "province" in the same lists.Welshbeef said:
Strictly - can you update your garage within the profile unless your a member of a car website who wants to own a car over actually owning one.
Would be good to hear your fantasy too.
We've been down this road before, are you going to start your "cockroach" nonsense on me as well? Would be good to hear your fantasy too.
Strocky said:
NoNeed said:
o it is a group of countries bound together by treaties, one of which is the UK of where Scotland is one of its regions.
The UK's Office for National Statistics, uses "country" to describe England, Scotland and Wales.[5] Northern Ireland, in contrast, is described as a "province" in the same lists.Strocky said:
So who do you support?
At the moment - "anyone but SNP", or to put it another way, democracy - that conclusion being drawn from the way debate was stifled in the run up to the referendum, and how I was personally treated by activists who knew nothing about me and judged me simply on my non-response to a loaded question, and how I watched institutionalised lies used to unseat honourable public representatives during the General Election. It is easier for me right now to state who I do not support rather than who I do.
Edited by r11co on Wednesday 26th August 13:06
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff