Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 7

[NoNeed]

Strocky said:

NoNeed said:

Do you think that all the Jewish land and wealth in Germany, Poland Slovakia e.t.c should be returned?

What about the terrorist attack against Israel by Palestinian groups? are they OK


It seems you have taken a side and are happy to condemn one group totally ignoring their suffering and misery and ignore the group that has caused that.Where most people accept there is no easy solution and both side have suffered.

And you are happy to do it based on Race. You sound like that MP.

I believe in reparations be it for blacks, Jews, Palestinians or any group of people that have been victimised by another group, I don't do bullies

And you've still dodged the question, I wonder why?

I made that perfectly clea in an earlier post and have not dodged anything, it is you that has chosen not to read. I repeat Israel/Israeli as that is a state that is more than just Jews.

[Strocky]

NoNeed said:

I made that perfectly clea in an earlier post and have not dodged anything, it is you that has chosen not to read. I repeat Israel/Israeli as that is a state that is more than just Jews.

Attributing them as "mongs" is both too vague and offensive

[s2art]

Strocky said:

Rollin said:

I always find it strange when these nationalists try to erase Scotland's enthusiastic part in the British Empire.

Nope those Scots that profited from the Empire's imperialism are s as well

How about the chinese, indians, africans, Caribbeans etc who profited from being in the Empire/Commonwealth?

[NoNeed]

Strocky said:

Attributing them as "mongs" is both too vague and offensive

Nice try, but it doesn't hide your racism nor that of your Nazi friends.

[Strocky]

s2art said:

How about the chinese, indians, africans, Caribbeans etc who profited from being in the Empire/Commonwealth?

And how have they been treated after being used?

Nice link for education

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YCu5B6AMoQ

[Strocky]

NoNeed said:

Nice try, but it doesn't hide your racism nor that of your Nazi friends.

Point out one racist thing I've posted, there's a good lad

You're becoming a parody of yourself, even some of your fellow unionists have asked you to reign in your hyperbole

[NoNeed]

Strocky said:

NoNeed said:

Nice try, but it doesn't hide your racism nor that of your Nazi friends.

Point put one racist thing I've posted, there's a good lad

Read back

[Strocky]

NoNeed said:

Read back

Nope spell it out instead of being a dodging stebag

[Justayellowbadge]

Give it a rest.

[NoNeed]

Strocky said:

NoNeed said:

Read back

Nope spell it out instead of being a cryptic stebag

You are defending the actions of the racist Paul Monaghan and even tried to come up with a more suitable term for the group he was abusing like that makes it more acceptable.

[NoNeed]

Justayellowbadge said:

Give it a rest.

OK boss

[Strocky]

Sway said:

Indeed. Although it's fair to say legitimate criticism of Israel is sometimes unfairly labelled anti-semitism, that wording is pretty clear.

As for Salmond, he didn't show the fortitude (as much as I disagree with it) of the Sinn Fein MPs. He has sworn to the Queen, and clearly as such London is his nation's capital. To then call it a 'dark star' is questionable at the least.

Edited by Sway on Friday 4th September 21:27

I assume he's alluding to the economic vacuum that London exerts over the rest of the country, I'm not aware of the connotations behind "dark star" is it the old "metropolitan" code?

[Strocky]

NoNeed said:

You are defending the actions of the racist Paul Monaghan and even tried to come up with a more suitable term for the group he was abusing like that makes it more acceptable.

Calling someone a thick is hardly defending them ffs

[NoNeed]

Strocky said:

NoNeed said:

You are defending the actions of the racist Paul Monaghan and even tried to come up with a more suitable term for the group he was abusing like that makes it more acceptable.

Calling someone a thick is hardly defending them ffs

You said that he was thick g=for wording it wrong, not for the attack.


Now the boss says give it a rest I suggest we do that before we lose posting privilages.

[r11co]

Strocky said:

I assume he's alluding to the economic vacuum that London exerts over the rest of the country.

That just reeks of bitter jealousy Strocky. There's plenty of work down there if you are interested in benefiting from the 'economic vacuum' instead of just moaning about it.

Pathetic really - you mention another part of the world as if somehow you are excluded from it when that is the polar opposite of the case.

[s2art]

Strocky said:

s2art said:

How about the chinese, indians, africans, Caribbeans etc who profited from being in the Empire/Commonwealth?

And how have they been treated after being used?

Nice link for education

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YCu5B6AMoQ

Not interested in anything you consider 'education' thanks. They must have been treated quite well, otherwise why did they wish to stay on in the commonwealth?

[Strocky]

r11co said:

That just reeks of bitter jealousy Strocky. There's plenty of work down there if you are interested in benefiting from the 'economic vacuum' instead of just moaning about it.

Pathetic really - you mention another part of the world as if somehow you are excluded from it when that is the polar opposite of the case.

Will pick you up on a couple of things if I may, not every-bodies God is money, some folks get as much satisfaction out of volunteering as earning a 6 figure bonus for knowing how to defraud a spreadsheet

London isn't the be all and end all for earning, the extra you get is quickly gobbled up in rent/costs, you can easily have a better quality of life/spending power in other parts of the country

The point I was trying to make is that the hold that the "market" has over the governing of our country has made our outlook very London-centric to the detriment of other parts of the country

The UK has very diverse regional nuances that appear (to me) to be diluted by the macroeconomics of the "city"

[Strocky]

s2art said:

Not interested in anything you consider 'education' thanks. They must have been treated quite well, otherwise why did they wish to stay on in the commonwealth?

How sad a closed mind, will give you a quick summary "thanks for helping us out when it suited, but why don't you go home?"

How many dominions are controlled by Westminster now since the 50s?

[NoNeed]

Strocky said:

How sad a closed mind, will give you a quick summary "thanks for helping us out when it suited, but why don't you go home?"

Isn't that what you and your nat friends wanted to say to the UK when they thought the oil had value.

[Strocky]

NoNeed said:

Isn't that what you and your nat friends wanted to say to the UK when they thought the oil had value.

Oil "had" value and the UK said thanks

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/scottish-indep...