Another Tunisian Attack - Sousse

Another Tunisian Attack - Sousse

Author
Discussion

SPS

1,306 posts

260 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
Schmy said:
NicD said:
normally some bottom feeder would be along to ridicule this as a figment of the Daily Mail or Express, but since you are quoting the Guardian, you should be OK. smile
Is it on the Guardian? Can't obviously see it.

The MSN article is a rehash of a DM piece, even making sure we know the price of his house.
And in the Telegraph too.
And why the bloody hell should we not know?
We are keeping the st and his brood while he laughs at us and (allegedly) is part of a massacre of ours and other countries citizens.
The first priority of any government is to protect it's citizens not have to pander to a ridiculously unbalanced "Human Rights" Act/Convention or at least it's interpretation.



Edited by SPS on Monday 6th July 20:19


Edited by SPS on Monday 6th July 20:20

RedTrident

8,290 posts

235 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
SPS said:
This useless lame ass government has got to start the fight back in earnest. Hit em with special forces and cut of their revenue streams!
Their revenue streams are from the rich Arab countries that we like to do business with. A country such as Saudi Arabia where they practice many of the very barbaric practices that IS like to showcase.

The hypocrisy of our government (regardless of political party) in this area continues to disappoint me. We are selling weapons and doing business with the very countries that are arming IS and AQ.

968

11,961 posts

248 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
You have been around long enough to know this happens frequently -reporting derided simply because it is in the DM or the Express.
Usually because it's bks. However this may well be true, regardless of source nonetheless his language needs explanation, if he has the courage to do so.

NicD

3,281 posts

257 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
968 said:
Usually because it's bks. However this may well be true, regardless of source nonetheless his language needs explanation, if he has the courage to do so.
Are you talking to me?
I need explain nothing to you, and if the cap fits, wear it.

I am still in shock over the CTF revelations. Nice little clique.


Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
NicD said:
968 said:
Usually because it's bks. However this may well be true, regardless of source nonetheless his language needs explanation, if he has the courage to do so.
Are you talking to me?
I need explain nothing to you, and if the cap fits, wear it.

I am still in shock over the CTF revelations. Nice little clique.
968, I agree with NicD,the term the cap fits did go through my mind too. Could well be on issues you are sensitive to. Sorry.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
Why so hostile to 968?
What is CTF?

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I don't think anyone is being hostile to 968.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 6th July 2015
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
968, I agree with NicD,the term the cap fits did go through my mind too. Could well be on issues you are sensitive to. Sorry.
What does this mean?

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
NicD said:
normally some bottom feeder would be along to ridicule this as a figment of the Daily Mail or Express, but since you are quoting the Guardian, you should be OK. smile
smile
Is this an attempt to suggest that anyone who disputes the veracity or integrity of the Express or the Mail is an obvious frothing left wing sponger from society?

I suppose it would be untimely to point out that the Mail and the Express are targeted to appeal to politically right of centre semi-permanently grumpy old people, wouldn't it?

Disastrous

10,081 posts

217 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
NicD said:
968 said:
Usually because it's bks. However this may well be true, regardless of source nonetheless his language needs explanation, if he has the courage to do so.
Are you talking to me?
I need explain nothing to you, and if the cap fits, wear it.

I am still in shock over the CTF revelations. Nice little clique.
rofl at 'revelations', you massive drama queen.

For clarity, these hard-hitting revelations which have rocked NicD to his core are that some posters on PH also use another forum called CTF where they 'know' one another. As if the notion of people being active on more than forum wasn't bad enough, they also coincidentally happen to find his posting style and comments on the UKIP thread (amongst others) distasteful and collectively disagree with him.

I hope anyone reading that was sitting down first,

968

11,961 posts

248 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
NicD said:
Are you talking to me?
I need explain nothing to you, and if the cap fits, wear it.

I am still in shock over the CTF revelations. Nice little clique.
Yes I'm talking to you and have been directly quoting you as I don't hide behind this forum, unlike yourself who still lacks the bravery to actually name who you are calling a bottom feeder despite saying it. And yes you do need to explain it to me since it seems to be me that your directing such comments to, so perhaps find some courage and speak up, or has the 'shock' of the ctf revelation rendered you incapable?


968

11,961 posts

248 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
968, I agree with NicD,the term the cap fits did go through my mind too. Could well be on issues you are sensitive to. Sorry.
I know you agree with NicD but that doesn't surprise me in the least. It's rather depressing, however, that you lack the class to recognise the idiocy and cowardice of such a statement. These issues I'm 'sensitive' to a clearly a construct of your mind as in this case I agreed this issue is appalling, so your cliche opinion of me is incorrect.

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
SPS said:
then we hear that one of the "school girls" who went to Syria has been mocking the dead in the Tunisian attack on social media.
  1. jesuischarlie

LastLight

1,339 posts

184 months

Tuesday 7th July 2015
quotequote all
groucho said:
SPS said:
Just read a story on MSN/Guardian news feed that the suspected planner and trainer of the disgusting prick who murdered all of those poor souls in Tunisia is living here on £50K worth of benefits and his wife has 5 children. Now if this is true it has to bloody stop now ffs!!!
This useless lame ass government has got to start the fight back in earnest. Hit em with special forces and cut of their revenue streams!
I mean we are just seen as a push over - then we hear that one of the "school girls" who went to Syria has been mocking the dead in the Tunisian attack on social media.
Link
I just read the linked report. Obviously share the outrage that he can still be here and hasn't been investigated and prosecuted more diligently and punished, let alone deported, if the strong suspicions are correct. How much smoke can there be without fire, or in this case an enflamer?

The main reaction though, was to be reminded of how so many, including politicians, police and members of the great and the good bleated in such concerned fashion about their safety and wished them to have been found out and stopped from travelling. Why? So vile individuals like her who wish death on many because they might not share her religious fanatasism can stay here and plot and ferment from within? I hope 'they', like her, all go and all get traced and bombed off the face of the Earth.



Edited by LastLight on Tuesday 7th July 13:46

AJL308

6,390 posts

156 months

Wednesday 8th July 2015
quotequote all
johnxjsc1985 said:
What happend to them a lot of them haven't evolved in over a thousand years is this the result of religion?.
It certainly looks that way.

essayer

9,065 posts

194 months

Thursday 9th July 2015
quotequote all
https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/tunisia

FCO have now advised against all non-essential travel, as another terrorist attack is "highly likely".

Tour operators have cancelled whatever holidays were still booked and are arranging repatriation.

Feel sorry for the Tunisians who will have livelihoods destroyed by this.. hope it doesn't travel further west to Morocco.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Thursday 9th July 2015
quotequote all
essayer said:
Feel sorry for the Tunisians who will have livelihoods destroyed by this.. hope it doesn't travel further west to Morocco.
Where next?

Talk of building a wall on border with Libya (Gaddafi was doing a fine job)...... the great wall of China probably worked to keep the Mongols out but that is/was a mega big wall, manned by hundreds of thousands.

Walls do not really work, maybe mitigate as in the Israel situation.

PoleDriver

28,637 posts

194 months

Friday 10th July 2015
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Walls do not really work, maybe mitigate as in the Israel situation.
Tru dat!
Hadrian didn't manage to keep the scots enclosed! wink

FiF

44,067 posts

251 months

Friday 10th July 2015
quotequote all
Oh ffs, the woman complaining on R4 Today programme over the FCO changing its advice. Does she not understand how new information can change things. Plus the FCO does not "tell people what to do" as she claimed, FCO tries to inform so people and tour operators can make informed decisions and take responsibility for their own actions.

There's a phrase that doesn't get understood too often " responsibility for one's own actions."

No doubt the stupid cow will be claiming compensation for her tour rep not returning her call from last night by sparrow's fart this morning. No doubt she will want full return of the entire holiday cost despite admitting the security arrangements in her hotel are very good.

zygalski

7,759 posts

145 months

Friday 10th July 2015
quotequote all
Calm down dear.