BBC to axe 1000 jobs. Wheels are comming off....

BBC to axe 1000 jobs. Wheels are comming off....

Author
Discussion

Smollet

10,573 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
Luke Warm said:
They made a complete hash of the Diamond Jubilee
Agreed. I thought I'd stumbled on CBBC by mistake.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
Ali G said:
fblm said:
I love the posts that say; leave it as it is, I like the BBC and don't mind paying the license fee, it's only pennies a day. In other words I like it and I'm happy to pay for it so long as it's subsidised by everyone else.
Non sequitur

smile
Really? The judgement of value is based on the current price which is subsidised by everyone else. If the BBC were not funded in this manner it would have far fewer subscribers than currently pay the license fee and the value proposition would be entirely different. Being 'happy to pay' the license fee to watch a subscription BBC is meaningless because without the subsidy of everyone else the fee would either be far higher or less/lower 'quality' programming. Ergo, the statements that people like the BBC and it is good value are based entirely on the service they enjoy being subsidised by people who don't. How many would pay for a subscription BBC at twice the price?

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
fblm said:
How many would pay for a subscription BBC at twice the price?
Probably fewer than half of the current "subscribers".

chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
Smollet said:
Luke Warm said:
They made a complete hash of the Diamond Jubilee
Agreed. I thought I'd stumbled on CBBC by mistake.
And isn't their Wimbledon programme, fronted by Claire Balding, receiving an almost universal ribbing right now?

They used to do quality programmes (from my point of view), I don't they do so much now, despite receiving £143 per year from almost every single UK household with a TV


Edited by chris watton on Friday 3rd July 15:50

technodup

7,581 posts

130 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
johnfm said:
technodup said:
NinjaPower said:
The BBC have never really had to worry about making a profit so they don't have to worry too much that Top Gear cost around £1 million per episode to make.
House of Cards and Orange is the New Black are $4m an episode. Both were highly rated although season 3 of OITNB is poor.

Netflix made $71M (£42M) profit in the last quarter. That's quarter, not year. Why can people not see the BBC and its funding model is utterly fked?
Comparing US budgets to UK budgets is like comparing apples to toothpicks.

The U.S. TV production system and re revenue streams which underpin them are completely different.

The bulk of the additional U.S. Production costs go in extraordinarily high cast costs and writing /show runner fees and studio profit.

Writers and cast get paid much much much much less in the UK. Production companies make much less too.
I wasn't comparing them per se, merely pointing out that newer, smaller and more innovative businesses can invest heavily in quality programming and still make money without the threat of jail for consumers who don't want to watch.

It's by the by anyway. Between 1m fewer licence payers, ncreased competition, job cuts, channel cuts, charter renewal and noises from government the direction of travel is pretty clear.

TommoAE86

2,667 posts

127 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
truck71 said:
I must be a rare beast in that I am happy with the licence fee and feel the BBC largely does a good job. The uninterrupted programs are a relief from commercial TV, the radio is great and some of the BBC4 stuff is what only it can do well.

I can tolerate the lefties, BBC1, Radio1 etc by ignoring them and focusing on the bits I like. Bargain for me.
This is much better put than anything I was going to say. I'd like to add that I'd rather be nibbled to death by an okapi than give that disgusting walking disease over in sky any of my money.

rovermorris999

5,202 posts

189 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
I predict that within a generation the BBC as we know it will have withered on the vine as the income from the licence fee dries up. Most people will stream everything and watch when they want to. The idea of having to sit down at a time determined by someone else to view a programme will seem archaic. Sure, PVRs give this now but you have to set the thing.

V8forweekends

2,481 posts

124 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
I'd love to know why they (the BBC) feel they need to rehabilitate offenders who are part of the establishment. Aitken got his turn, now it's Vicky Pryce - I can't believe there's no-one at least as well-qualified to pontificate about Greek economics who hasn't recently done time for lying to the beak. I'd love to know how many opportunities they offer to other offenders when they come out.

truck71

2,328 posts

172 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
V8forweekends said:
I'd love to know why they (the BBC) feel they need to rehabilitate offenders who are part of the establishment. Aitken got his turn, now it's Vicky Pryce - I can't believe there's no-one at least as well-qualified to pontificate about Greek economics who hasn't recently done time for lying to the beak. I'd love to know how many opportunities they offer to other offenders when they come out.
I think part of the idea about prison is to rehabilitate offenders so they can be reintroduced to society. Part of that reintroduction would be to get a job. The alternative is a return to crime which no one wants.

jjones

4,426 posts

193 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
chris watton said:
And isn't their Wimbledon programme, fronted by Claire Balding[/footnote]
[viz letters]
I thought Clare batted for the other side so to speak but she has just declared she cannot wait to see Andy Murray's semi
[/viz letters]

V8forweekends

2,481 posts

124 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
truck71 said:
V8forweekends said:
I'd love to know why they (the BBC) feel they need to rehabilitate offenders who are part of the establishment. Aitken got his turn, now it's Vicky Pryce - I can't believe there's no-one at least as well-qualified to pontificate about Greek economics who hasn't recently done time for lying to the beak. I'd love to know how many opportunities they offer to other offenders when they come out.
I think part of the idea about prison is to rehabilitate offenders so they can be reintroduced to society. Part of that reintroduction would be to get a job. The alternative is a return to crime which no one wants.
Yes, hence my wondering how many other people get offered work at the BBC when they get out - or is their rehab reserved for establishment figures and/or their embittered exes?

g3org3y

20,627 posts

191 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
johnfm said:
I like some of the BBC. Having worked in TV for a while there is plenty I don't like about how it is run and how much they spend and waste.

Way too many unsackable people moved sideways or, worse, up into roles paying a lot of money with no ultimate responsibility for success or failure and no way of measuring success or failure.

Do they need 3,000 cooking shows and 40,000 webpages with recipes on it?

Do they need to pay the likes of Jonathan Ross or Chris Evans or Jeremy Clarkson millions? No. They should be out discovering the next generation of those people and the. Let the commercial channel over pay them.

Amusing to hear the cuts will cut management layers down to 'just 7'. Laughable really.

Part of the problem is that for so long they have had billions per year to spend with no risk of it dwindling or disappearing due to bad decisions - so there is no fallout from sending so many people to Gladtonbury or similar.

I don't know what the solution may be - but I doubt they can continue to demand £4b a year and not put an end to the gravy train for many of their staff.
Very much agree with this.

Beati Dogu

8,891 posts

139 months

Saturday 4th July 2015
quotequote all
V8forweekends said:
I'd love to know why they (the BBC) feel they need to rehabilitate offenders who are part of the establishment. Aitken got his turn, now it's Vicky Pryce - I can't believe there's no-one at least as well-qualified to pontificate about Greek economics who hasn't recently done time for lying to the beak. I'd love to know how many opportunities they offer to other offenders when they come out.
Well don't let than Anglicised name fool you, she's actually Greek and by all accounts an extremely good economist (if there is such a thing). Plus, she was instrumental in bringing down that sack of **** Chris Huhne, for which the nation should forever be thankful.

MGJohn

10,203 posts

183 months

Saturday 4th July 2015
quotequote all
Yet, every now and again, good old BBC comes up with a gem. I'm watching one right now.

Freeview Channel 9 BBC FOUR :~

"Rock and Roll America" ....

My kind of stuff. The stuff schoolboy me grew up with.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Saturday 4th July 2015
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
V8forweekends said:
I'd love to know why they (the BBC) feel they need to rehabilitate offenders who are part of the establishment. Aitken got his turn, now it's Vicky Pryce - I can't believe there's no-one at least as well-qualified to pontificate about Greek economics who hasn't recently done time for lying to the beak. I'd love to know how many opportunities they offer to other offenders when they come out.
Well don't let than Anglicised name fool you, she's actually Greek and by all accounts an extremely good economist (if there is such a thing). Plus, she was instrumental in bringing down that sack of **** Chris Huhne, for which the nation should forever be thankful.
To be honest, I am amazed at the number of Greek economists there seems to be.

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Saturday 4th July 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
To be honest, I am amazed at the number of Greek economists there seems to be.
Looking at the state of their economy I assumed it was a sort of national pass-time.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Saturday 4th July 2015
quotequote all
Most of them seem to work outside Greece - which might be the reason they're in the mess they are.

supersingle

3,205 posts

219 months

Saturday 4th July 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Most of them seem to work outside Greece - which might be the reason they're in the mess they are.
Economists are excellent at solving economic problems...

...in hindsight.

Ali G

3,526 posts

282 months

Saturday 4th July 2015
quotequote all
fblm said:
Ali G said:
fblm said:
I love the posts that say; leave it as it is, I like the BBC and don't mind paying the license fee, it's only pennies a day. In other words I like it and I'm happy to pay for it so long as it's subsidised by everyone else.
Non sequitur

smile
Really? The judgement of value is based on the current price which is subsidised by everyone else. If the BBC were not funded in this manner it would have far fewer subscribers than currently pay the license fee and the value proposition would be entirely different. Being 'happy to pay' the license fee to watch a subscription BBC is meaningless because without the subsidy of everyone else the fee would either be far higher or less/lower 'quality' programming. Ergo, the statements that people like the BBC and it is good value are based entirely on the service they enjoy being subsidised by people who don't. How many would pay for a subscription BBC at twice the price?
Feel free to speculate!

The above is not a logical conclusion of whatever assertions you are trying to make.

And that is all!

smile