Tube Strike

Author
Discussion

myvision

1,949 posts

137 months

Sunday 10th January 2016
quotequote all
What exactly is it they want do they even know themselves?
If they are hiring drivers to run night tube they have no disruption so what is the problem now?

blueg33

36,063 posts

225 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
kev1974 said:
I guess the union didn't like TfL announcing the other day that they were just going to hire a load of extra part time drivers to run the Night Tube then.
Ironic when part of the issue is that they don't want their drivers to have to drive shifts at night.........

sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
myvision said:
What exactly is it they want do they even know themselves?
If they are hiring drivers to run night tube they have no disruption so what is the problem now[?
£££

Slaav

4,263 posts

211 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
sidicks said:
myvision said:
What exactly is it they want do they even know themselves?
If they are hiring drivers to run night tube they have no disruption so what is the problem now[?
£££
As one of the 'usual suspects' who despises the way that the tube drivers/workers/unions hold London regularly to ransom, I am nonplussed about this strike! Much more behaviour of this type and the militants and unions will snooker themselves into a position where Boris/TfL will have no choice but to legislate or 'break' the unions.

It can't happen soon enough!

I haven't read enough this time around but I really do sincerely hope the hiring of part time or night shift workers isn't one of the major gripes? Especially considering that the forcing of new rotas and night shifts on 'members' was a major cause of the last strikes apparently?

Don't want to work nights? Fine, these guys/girls will do it.....

Or is it in fact simply about money which unsurprisingly can smooth over the work/life balance which is so important to the members and unions?

Indefensible??? Maybe? Or the unions justifying their own existence?




Ps - I am sure that I did read something about 'the interests of our members and FUTURE EMPLOYEES' ??? FFS....

myvision

1,949 posts

137 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
Slaav said:
sidicks said:
myvision said:
What exactly is it they want do they even know themselves?
If they are hiring drivers to run night tube they have no disruption so what is the problem now[?
£££
As one of the 'usual suspects' who despises the way that the tube drivers/workers/unions hold London regularly to ransom, I am nonplussed about this strike! Much more behaviour of this type and the militants and unions will snooker themselves into a position where Boris/TfL will have no choice but to legislate or 'break' the unions.

It can't happen soon enough!

I haven't read enough this time around but I really do sincerely hope the hiring of part time or night shift workers isn't one of the major gripes? Especially considering that the forcing of new rotas and night shifts on 'members' was a major cause of the last strikes apparently?

Don't want to work nights? Fine, these guys/girls will do it.....

Or is it in fact simply about money which unsurprisingly can smooth over the work/life balance which is so important to the members and unions?

Indefensible??? Maybe? Or the unions justifying their own existence?




Ps - I am sure that I did read something about 'the interests of our members and FUTURE EMPLOYEES' ??? FFS....
But we keep getting told that it's not about money.
So if it's not about money and not about working nightshifts what do they want?

kev1974

4,029 posts

130 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
They don't seem to know what they are unhappy about - this from RMT today is certainly all wishy-washy.
http://www.rmt.org.uk/news/rmt-confirms-further-in...

There is some whinging about money in there but it does seem that TfL saying "fine if you don't want to work the Night Tube we'll just hire other people who do" and leaving it at that, has really pee'd them off. As presumably those new hires will either be on contracts that somehow disallow or discourage union membership, or it will be clear to the new hires from the way they've been hired that they're far more replaceable going forward.

danllama

5,728 posts

143 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
It's an absolute farce. Public sympathy will hit 0.

Edited by danllama on Monday 11th January 16:25

Slaav

4,263 posts

211 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
For anybody interested but too lazy to follow the link above:

RMT General Secretary Mick Cash said:
“RMT members are furious at the bodged introduction of the Mayor’s Night Tube plans and the fact that they have been tied in with a pay deal that has left our members dangling on a string and out of pocket since April last year. RMT supports the principle of a properly worked out Night Tube service introduced through agreement with the unions but the abject failure to work through the detail has led to a comprehensive breakdown in the negotiations and has forced us to name a programme of further industrial action. This whole situation could have been avoided if London Underground, under direction from the Mayor, had dealt with the Night Tube professionally from the off instead of resorting to ultimatums and imposition.

“RMT has fought for more jobs on the Underground to cope with the added pressures of Night Tube but those jobs must be within the framework of the existing tube operations and must offer career opportunities to the Underground’s existing staff, including existing drivers who may choose to take up the offer of reducing their hours.

“On the station staffing crisis it is absolutely crazy to be bulldozing through and imposing new rosters linked to the axing of over 800 safety-critical jobs from early next month when there is a heightened security status and when services are dangerously overcrowded across the network. The current plans also rip up previous agreements to protect staff caught in the middle of this reorganisation. The station staff are the eyes and ears of the Underground and hacking back their numbers represents a lethal gamble with safety that RMT will continue to fight against.

“RMT remains available for talks in both disputes.”

Not quite sure what the dispute is actually about reading that bar the RMT clearly wants everything on whatever terms it decrees are perfect for their members? But wont state clearly what those terms are?

Bottom line is they want jobs for life, work whenever they feel like it, closed shop, pay rises and guaranteed improvements to their work/life balance?

Seems OK to most of us I guess? beer



danllama

5,728 posts

143 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
But they don't want more money. Tossers.

AMG Merc

11,954 posts

254 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
RMT is furious? So what!

Suggestion: Do your job to the best of your ability every day and take the wage. If you don't like how your employer runs their business then feel free to RESIGN and let another have your job. Where I come from it's not a good idea to tell your employer how to run their business.

Robertj21a

16,481 posts

106 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
AMG Merc said:
RMT is furious? So what!

Suggestion: Do your job to the best of your ability every day and take the wage. If you don't like how your employer runs their business then feel free to RESIGN and let another have your job. Where I come from it's not a good idea to tell your employer how to run their business.
Surely you know that the RMT considers itself superior to the law, management, other unions and all lowly plebs who just get on with their daily graft without continually whingeing about everything ?

rambo19

2,750 posts

138 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
danllama said:
It's an absolute farce. Public sympathy will hit 0.

Edited by danllama on Monday 11th January 16:25
Drivers don't care what the public think, and I don't blame them.
RMT are fighting for T&C's because they have seen what TFL did to londons buses and don't want the same to happen to them.

danllama

5,728 posts

143 months

Monday 11th January 2016
quotequote all
rambo19 said:
Drivers don't care what the public think, and I don't blame them.
RMT are fighting for T&C's because they have seen what TFL did to londons buses and don't want the same to happen to them.
Well, then they won't be surprised when it all blows up in their face!

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
Tube staff have been offered a four-year pay deal, lump sum payments of £500 each and the prospect of a 36-hour, four-day week to call off strikes starting next week and get the Night Tube up and running.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/tube-staf...


Aslef's lead organiser said: "We have dragged them (LUL) kicking and screaming into the 21st Century with an agreement to deliver modern, flexible working patterns for our members and an above inflation pay rise. This demonstrates just what strong, progressive trade unions can deliver in Britain today."

Slaav

4,263 posts

211 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
djstevec said:
Tube staff have been offered a four-year pay deal, lump sum payments of £500 each and the prospect of a 36-hour, four-day week to call off strikes starting next week and get the Night Tube up and running.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/tube-staf...


Aslef's lead organiser said: "We have dragged them (LUL) kicking and screaming into the 21st Century with an agreement to deliver modern, flexible working patterns for our members and an above inflation pay rise. This demonstrates just what strong, progressive trade unions can deliver in Britain today."
Can you imagine what Junior Doctors should have if this is what a tube driver can negotiate???? (Well their unions anyway)

Bl00dy farcical!!!

frown


sidicks

25,218 posts

222 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
As a reminder - "it's not about the money"...

Stedman

7,228 posts

193 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
Up the union.

George111

6,930 posts

252 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
djstevec said:
Tube staff have been offered a four-year pay deal, lump sum payments of £500 each and the prospect of a 36-hour, four-day week to call off strikes starting next week and get the Night Tube up and running.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/tube-staf...


Aslef's lead organiser said: "We have dragged them (LUL) kicking and screaming into the 21st Century with an agreement to deliver modern, flexible working patterns for our members and an above inflation pay rise. This demonstrates just what strong, progressive trade unions can deliver in Britain today."
They've not got the 36 hour 4 day week yet . . . I bet they might be offered that with a 20% pay cut !

Slaav

4,263 posts

211 months

Thursday 21st January 2016
quotequote all
sidicks said:
As a reminder - "it's not about the money"...
I totally agree with you!

It clearly isn't about the money.....

But the extra one off £500 does improve work/life balance?
And the prospect of an above inflation pay rise and reduced hours - which again improves the work life balance will go down well. The fact that it would massively increase their hourly rate is a pure coincidence!!!

Mmmmm..... frown

richie99

1,116 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd January 2016
quotequote all
Just play them along while quietly introducing technology which will do away with their jobs. The more outrageous the settlements, the easier it is to justify investing in technology. Just how stupid do you have to be or is it a deliberate strategy to fill your boots before the party is over.