Tube Strike

Author
Discussion

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
KTF said:
No, yes, market forces.
What market forces might these be?

Transmitter Man

4,253 posts

224 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
Can anyone imagine how Eddy Shah or Maggie for that matter would handle this excuse for a union?

Phil

egor110

16,869 posts

203 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you want to be a tube driver you do your time as platform staff then apply for driver training, so it's not really a closed shop is it.

What pisses you off is that you'd like to go straight in as a driver and not deal with the great unwashed on the platforms and unfortunately no matter how highly educated you are you can't.

valiant

10,236 posts

160 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
egor110 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you want to be a tube driver you do your time as platform staff then apply for driver training, so it's not really a closed shop is it.

What pisses you off is that you'd like to go straight in as a driver and not deal with the great unwashed on the platforms and unfortunately no matter how highly educated you are you can't.
Over Christmas there was an open recruitment campaign to hire 180 part time drivers for night tube. Advertised to all via the tfl website. 6000 applied.

Mandalore

4,220 posts

113 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
All of the facts should be publicised so that Jo Public is aware exactly what the arguments are about and can make their own decisions about what is fair - rather than some journalist with an agenda.


Earnings, working hours, overtine, sick pay, pensions, closed-shop, benefits - all of it.


Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
egor110 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you want to be a tube driver you do your time as platform staff then apply for driver training, so it's not really a closed shop is it.

What pisses you off is that you'd like to go straight in as a driver and not deal with the great unwashed on the platforms and unfortunately no matter how highly educated you are you can't.
How is that not a closed shop?

I love the way you call the public the great unwashed. Some of the Underground staff could spend a little more time in the bathroom.

I'm not convinced, by the way, that tonker is desperate to become a Tube driver.

Trevatanus

11,123 posts

150 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
egor110 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you want to be a tube driver you do your time as platform staff then apply for driver training, so it's not really a closed shop is it.

What pisses you off is that you'd like to go straight in as a driver and not deal with the great unwashed on the platforms and unfortunately no matter how highly educated you are you can't.
Why should LU have a unique situation? What's the justification for this?

98elise

26,619 posts

161 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
egor110 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you want to be a tube driver you do your time as platform staff then apply for driver training, so it's not really a closed shop is it.

What pisses you off is that you'd like to go straight in as a driver and not deal with the great unwashed on the platforms and unfortunately no matter how highly educated you are you can't.
Who decided that Tube Drivers must be platform staff first? Is it a Union or Management decision?





Trevatanus

11,123 posts

150 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
98elise said:
egor110 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you want to be a tube driver you do your time as platform staff then apply for driver training, so it's not really a closed shop is it.

What pisses you off is that you'd like to go straight in as a driver and not deal with the great unwashed on the platforms and unfortunately no matter how highly educated you are you can't.
Who decided that Tube Drivers must be platform staff first? Is it a Union or Management decision?
I believe that unions decided that tube drivers jobs would not be advertised externally, so this is being offered as a "workaround" I think. So, the former.

TheInternet

4,717 posts

163 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Zod said:
I'm not convinced, by the way, that tonker is desperate to become a Tube driver.
Quite, more of a Deltic up the West Coast Main Line type.

Slaav

4,255 posts

210 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Today's first hand experience of the lovely station staff is from a journey from London Bridge to Holborn.

First sight of station staff was at the wide gates to the Northern Line. Plenty of hurrying passengers fumbling through as per usual.

Two fine upstanding members of station staff 'manning' the barriers to assist I guess. One leaning all over the wide gates/barrier as if his legs had stopped working and he was being dragged back to school after the summer holidays. The second one standing far enough away from the flow of passengers that you couldn't get his attention if you tried. He was also engrossed in his phone and looked as though he was playing a game!!

Two less professional slobs you would struggle to find. And this is clearly a busy tourist heavy station and outside rush hour.

Rick101

6,970 posts

150 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Doubt they would be first up for drivers jobs then.

danllama

5,728 posts

142 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Slaav said:
Today's first hand experience of the lovely station staff is from a journey from London Bridge to Holborn.

First sight of station staff was at the wide gates to the Northern Line. Plenty of hurrying passengers fumbling through as per usual.

Two fine upstanding members of station staff 'manning' the barriers to assist I guess. One leaning all over the wide gates/barrier as if his legs had stopped working and he was being dragged back to school after the summer holidays. The second one standing far enough away from the flow of passengers that you couldn't get his attention if you tried. He was also engrossed in his phone and looked as though he was playing a game!!

Two less professional slobs you would struggle to find. And this is clearly a busy tourist heavy station and outside rush hour.
Haha that's funny! I go through various stations on the Jubilee line every day and this is pretty much par for the course.

Sod the lot of them.

p.s. except the American lady at Canary Wharf on the announcer, never seen her face but she sounds tasty.

egor110

16,869 posts

203 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Zod said:
egor110 said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If you want to be a tube driver you do your time as platform staff then apply for driver training, so it's not really a closed shop is it.

What pisses you off is that you'd like to go straight in as a driver and not deal with the great unwashed on the platforms and unfortunately no matter how highly educated you are you can't.
How is that not a closed shop?

I love the way you call the public the great unwashed. Some of the Underground staff could spend a little more time in the bathroom.

I'm not convinced, by the way, that tonker is desperate to become a Tube driver.
A closed shop wouldn't advertise the job the union would approach staff re becoming a driver, this clearly isn't what happens with L.U.

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
egor110 said:
A closed shop wouldn't advertise the job the union would approach staff re becoming a driver, this clearly isn't what happens with L.U.
So they advertise the job but only platform staff can apply?
Sounds like a good use of resources.

And yes, that is still exactly what a "closed shop" means.
If it were open then ANYONE could apply.

It seems this concept is difficult to grasp, along with "it's not about money".

Slaav

4,255 posts

210 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
egor110 said:
A closed shop wouldn't advertise the job the union would approach staff re becoming a driver, this clearly isn't what happens with L.U.
err...

"A pre-entry closed shop (or simply closed shop) is a form of union security agreement under which the employer agrees to hire union members only, and employees must remain members of the union at all times in order to remain employed"



Robertj21a

16,477 posts

105 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Mandalore said:
All of the facts should be publicised so that Jo Public is aware exactly what the arguments are about and can make their own decisions about what is fair - rather than some journalist with an agenda.


Earnings, working hours, overtine, sick pay, pensions, closed-shop, benefits - all of it.
Union members have confirmed previously that they really don't care about the general public's view of them nowadays as they know they will always be against them.

Trevatanus

11,123 posts

150 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Robertj21a said:
Mandalore said:
All of the facts should be publicised so that Jo Public is aware exactly what the arguments are about and can make their own decisions about what is fair - rather than some journalist with an agenda.


Earnings, working hours, overtine, sick pay, pensions, closed-shop, benefits - all of it.
Union members have confirmed previously that they really don't care about the general public 's view of them nowadays as they know they will always be against them.
Fixed that for you.

wolves_wanderer

12,387 posts

237 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
walm said:
egor110 said:
A closed shop wouldn't advertise the job the union would approach staff re becoming a driver, this clearly isn't what happens with L.U.
So they advertise the job but only platform staff can apply?
Sounds like a good use of resources.
Promoting from within is a very good use of resources IME. Take people on for the grunt work, sack them if they're st. When a better opportunity presents itself, you already have an idea if they are any good rather than having to take a gamble on an external candidate.

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
wolves_wanderer said:
walm said:
egor110 said:
A closed shop wouldn't advertise the job the union would approach staff re becoming a driver, this clearly isn't what happens with L.U.
So they advertise the job but only platform staff can apply?
Sounds like a good use of resources.
Promoting from within is a very good use of resources IME. Take people on for the grunt work, sack them if they're st. When a better opportunity presents itself, you already have an idea if they are any good rather than having to take a gamble on an external candidate.
Slight problem with that in the case of the Tube: the Unions won't let you sack the st ones.