Jeremy Corbyn

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Northern Munkee

5,354 posts

200 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
JawKnee said:
hidetheelephants said:
technodup said:
JawKnee said:
My prediction is the next government will be a Lab/SNP coalition.
You think English voters are going to a) vote for Corbyn in large numbers and b) accept the SNP, a single issue Scottish party taking power?

Dream. On
If nothing else Ed's refusal to rule out an SNP coalition helped to lose him the 2015 GE, so on that basis have at it.
Incorrect. You must have missed him say this.

"“Let me be plain. We’re not going to do a deal with the Scottish National party; we’re not going to have a coalition, we’re not going to have a deal."
He took so long to do so that no-one believed him when he uttered it.
No one believed anything Ed Miliband said, too often he appeared to take a policy position only after it was clear he was on popular sentiment side, then claim to be leading, when in fact, it came over as following (perhaps following focus group polling). And this is why no one believed him on anything, nor his ability to deliver them, or take a tough decision when the popular path does not present itself. Credibility. To certain extent Blair's point about leadership being about taking decisions, is true. About the only thing.

Dissimilarily Corbyn holds many of the same views as Ed M, but at least always has, but they are so far left, as to be only appealing to the SWP, Communists, Greens, and his cult members. Which is why the centre ground where elections are won just won't entertain him. He might win amongst his metropolitan socialist friends, and the university yoof but the ordinary working classes out in the provinces in the North, Wales, Midlands, East of England, don't care about Cuba, CND, BME or LGBT rights. They care about the economy, jobs, security, immigration, then maybe some of those other things, but only a little. I know, I know they'll claim he has a plan to win those ordinary people back, but like Ed no one believes it's a credible plan, one remotely likely to be deliverable, due to the enormous ideological baggage that comes with it.


Edited by Northern Munkee on Saturday 23 July 01:00

JawKnee

1,140 posts

97 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
JawKnee said:
hidetheelephants said:
technodup said:
JawKnee said:
My prediction is the next government will be a Lab/SNP coalition.
You think English voters are going to a) vote for Corbyn in large numbers and b) accept the SNP, a single issue Scottish party taking power?

Dream. On
If nothing else Ed's refusal to rule out an SNP coalition helped to lose him the 2015 GE, so on that basis have at it.
Incorrect. You must have missed him say this.

"“Let me be plain. We’re not going to do a deal with the Scottish National party; we’re not going to have a coalition, we’re not going to have a deal."
He took so long to do so that no-one believed him when he uttered it.
He also stated it nearly 2 months before the election!

First you say he refused to rule it out, then you say, oh actually he did but he left it too late. What will your next back track be?

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
JawKnee said:
gazza285 said:
JawKnee said:
No, because it could also end up being a Labour majority.
Do you really believe that?
Yes, along with hundreds of thousands of others.
You'll need to convince a few million more. And the Boundary Commission, don't forget about them.

technodup

7,580 posts

130 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
JawKnee said:
a) They did in May this year. Labour's vote share in England increased after only half a year with JC as leader.
b) It's not just about what the English think. Scotland are a part of the UK, their MPs are just as entitled to lead the country as much as any other MP.

It will happen.
They voted in council elections in full knowledge he wouldn't be running the country ffs. A GE is a totally different proposition.

And as a Scot, in Scotland I'm well aware of the SNP and their 'entitlement'.

I've already got a £50 charity bet on another forum that Corbyn won't be PM. I'm more than happy to take your money too- those guide dogs are clever but they don't train themselves...

///ajd

8,964 posts

206 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all

The Hypno-Toad

12,278 posts

205 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
///ajd said:
Yes it must be. Because it's not like Britains security services have anything more important than the future of the Labour Party to be concerned about at the moment, is it? rolleyes

It just proves how self-obssessed, pathetic and paranoid these idiots are. NOTHING is more important than the future of party, Comrade!

Totally hatstand.

Smollet

10,535 posts

190 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
Corbyn is obviously an MI5 mole planted in the Labour party back when he was turned at North London Poly back in the 70s.

turbobloke

103,877 posts

260 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
The Hypno-Toad said:
Yes it must be. Because it's not like Britains security services have anything more important than the future of the Labour Party to be concerned about at the moment, is it? rolleyes

It just proves how self-obssessed, pathetic and paranoid these idiots are. NOTHING is more important than the future of party, Comrade!

Totally hatstand.
Totally, even from a dinosaur defying extinction.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
Does anyone else see a remarkable resemblance between the Pro YeSNP supporters and their tactics v those who don't support their view? It's a rather ugly aspect

The SNP leaders gave lip service to rooting it out but nothing Was ever done.


I think Labour have a massive problem / they came to power by deliberately moving to the middle ground and won due to the fact they promised spending on schools and the NHS the public lapped it up - however no one questioned how it would be funded. That moved support away from Torys who were in fighting over Europe and had been ol in power 18 years.

There is not enough left leaning in the population to vote in a lefty labour.

This could and should be Renaissance of LibDems and I can see them winning really / it will swing lib dem to Tory and labour left utterly behind

Smollet

10,535 posts

190 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
There is not enough left leaning in the population to vote in a lefty labour.

This could and should be Renaissance of LibDems and I can see them winning really / it will swing lib dem to Tory and labour left utterly behind
I can certainly see Labour voters switching to either the LibDems or UKIP if this current fiasco isn't settled with the removal of Corbyn and as I don't see him going we'll probably end up with 4/5 parties opposing the Tories

D-Angle

4,467 posts

242 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
I have images of an exasperated analyst at Labour headquarters going "OK Jeremy, one last time: this group of voters is small. But that group of voters is far away..."

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
The Hypno-Toad said:
Yes it must be. Because it's not like Britains security services have anything more important than the future of the Labour Party to be concerned about at the moment, is it? rolleyes

It just proves how self-obssessed, pathetic and paranoid these idiots are. NOTHING is more important than the future of party, Comrade!

Totally hatstand.
It' not that hatstand. And MI5 have been busy in the past when at the height of the cold war they had a much more serious threat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Wilson_conspi...
Black propaganda against leaders from the left isn't that new either.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
Smollet said:
I can certainly see Labour voters switching to either the LibDems or UKIP if this current fiasco isn't settled with the removal of Corbyn and as I don't see him going we'll probably end up with 4/5 parties opposing the Tories
I recall Rees-Mogg and a few others a while back stating how important it was for the sake of the Tory party for a strong opposition. Without one, the Torys could fracture, or at least split into their tribes if they deem they are 'safe' enough to act against their real enemy, their opponents in the party. biggrin

Andy Zarse

10,868 posts

247 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
JawKnee said:
gazza285 said:
JawKnee said:
No, because it could also end up being a Labour majority.
Do you really believe that?
Yes, along with hundreds of thousands of others.
You'll really need to convince about 10 million. And you won't...

Vaud

50,426 posts

155 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
Halb said:
I recall Rees-Mogg and a few others a while back stating how important it was for the sake of the Tory party for a strong opposition. Without one, the Torys could fracture, or at least split into their tribes if they deem they are 'safe' enough to act against their real enemy, their opponents in the party. biggrin
Agreed. Strong govt is good for the country. Strong opposition to keep them in check is equally important.

nikaiyo2

4,710 posts

195 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
JawKnee said:
a) They did in May this year. Labour's vote share in England increased after only half a year with JC as leader.
b) It's not just about what the English think. Scotland are a part of the UK, their MPs are just as entitled to lead the country as much as any other MP.

It will happen.
How would that square with the momentum loons? Would they be happy to team up with a party who is very keen on stoking racial/ ethnic divide and has in the past supported the Nazis? Not the pretended Nazis, who question uncontrolled immigration, but the real reinhard heydrich type.

Funk

26,266 posts

209 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
D-Angle said:
I have images of an exasperated analyst at Labour headquarters going "OK Jeremy, one last time: this group of voters is small. But that group of voters is far away..."
hehe

JawKnee

1,140 posts

97 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
nikaiyo2 said:
JawKnee said:
a) They did in May this year. Labour's vote share in England increased after only half a year with JC as leader.
b) It's not just about what the English think. Scotland are a part of the UK, their MPs are just as entitled to lead the country as much as any other MP.

It will happen.
How would that square with the momentum loons? Would they be happy to team up with a party who is very keen on stoking racial/ ethnic divide and has in the past supported the Nazis? Not the pretended Nazis, who question uncontrolled immigration, but the real reinhard heydrich type.
What on earth are you on about man?

AstonZagato

12,698 posts

210 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
JawKnee said:
nikaiyo2 said:
JawKnee said:
a) They did in May this year. Labour's vote share in England increased after only half a year with JC as leader.
b) It's not just about what the English think. Scotland are a part of the UK, their MPs are just as entitled to lead the country as much as any other MP.

It will happen.
How would that square with the momentum loons? Would they be happy to team up with a party who is very keen on stoking racial/ ethnic divide and has in the past supported the Nazis? Not the pretended Nazis, who question uncontrolled immigration, but the real reinhard heydrich type.
What on earth are you on about man?
The SNP had Nazi links in WWII:
http://www.scotsman.com/news/mi5-file-links-former...

Also, it has been argued that some of their statements are dog whistle politics to drive a wedge between the Scottish and English.

JawKnee

1,140 posts

97 months

Saturday 23rd July 2016
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
JawKnee said:
nikaiyo2 said:
JawKnee said:
a) They did in May this year. Labour's vote share in England increased after only half a year with JC as leader.
b) It's not just about what the English think. Scotland are a part of the UK, their MPs are just as entitled to lead the country as much as any other MP.

It will happen.
How would that square with the momentum loons? Would they be happy to team up with a party who is very keen on stoking racial/ ethnic divide and has in the past supported the Nazis? Not the pretended Nazis, who question uncontrolled immigration, but the real reinhard heydrich type.
What on earth are you on about man?
The SNP had Nazi links in WWII:
http://www.scotsman.com/news/mi5-file-links-former...

Also, it has been argued that some of their statements are dog whistle politics to drive a wedge between the Scottish and English.
"Released without charge" tells you all you need to know about this certain piece of "intelligence".

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED