Cheating Website Ashley Madison Hacked

Cheating Website Ashley Madison Hacked

Author
Discussion

AndrewEH1

4,917 posts

154 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Well seems my ex-GF may have signed up as her email is on the list laugh

Wonder if it was before or after I met her/dumped her? Guess I'll need to download the full dump.

Edited by AndrewEH1 on Thursday 20th August 10:17

Soov535

35,829 posts

272 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Soov535 said:
http://yuc3i3hat65rpl7t.onion/stuff/impact-team-as...

You need the Tor browser to open that address. Get that here:

Be sure to read all of the words of caution about safe browsing and download in Tor. I mean it. TOR is a gateway to hell and a boot through the door at 7am.

The Torrent location is here:

http://mywuwj5f76usg7eo.onion/stuff/impact-team-as...

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Name searching would be good. Not everyone will be stupid enough to have used a work email address. Like Soov, I have one name I would really like to see on the list.

bad company

Original Poster:

18,640 posts

267 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
rxtx said:
bad company said:
So it's all ste then?
I don't know either way, but it's quite common for dating sites to have multiple brands that cater to different markets, whilst using the exact same hardware and software, just with a different front end.
Hmm, you said 'probably all using the same back-end."
'
I replied saying it's all ste then.

I'm wasted here. getmecoat

Davie_GLA

6,525 posts

200 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Soov535 said:
Dammit.... Edited.

Soov535

35,829 posts

272 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Zod said:
Name searching would be good. Not everyone will be stupid enough to have used a work email address. Like Soov, I have one name I would really like to see on the list.
hehe

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Zod said:
Name searching would be good. Not everyone will be stupid enough to have used a work email address like Soov
Bit harsh. I presume he used a burner.

Soov535

35,829 posts

272 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Zod said:
Name searching would be good. Not everyone will be stupid enough to have used a work email address like Soov
Bit harsh. I presume he used a burner.
Go on then.

hehe


jjlynn27

7,935 posts

110 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
a@me.com
aaaa@me.com
b@me.com
bbbb@me.com
c@me.com

All on the 'list'. If the list is actually available as a mysql file someone could just do simple

select * from <table_with_emails_here> where <email_field_here> like "%.gov.uk";

or any other domain instead of .gov.uk one is interested in.

theboss

6,919 posts

220 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
You don't even need to rely on names... there's several geo coordinates for each account. If the user logged on with a smartphone regularly whilst at home, with location services enabled, there's a good chance you can track them down to the very room they were in at the time hehe

Soov535

35,829 posts

272 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
theboss said:
You don't even need to rely on names... there's several geo coordinates for each account. If the user logged on with a smartphone regularly whilst at home, with location services enabled, there's a good chance you can track them down to the very room they were in at the time hehe
Holy hell

hehe


jshell

11,027 posts

206 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
jjlynn27 said:
a@me.com
aaaa@me.com
b@me.com
bbbb@me.com
c@me.com

All on the 'list'. If the list is actually available as a mysql file someone could just do simple

select * from <table_with_emails_here> where <email_field_here> like "%.gov.uk";

or any other domain instead of .gov.uk one is interested in.
A lot of poeple will be waiting for just this so they can blanket check their organisational resources!!!

CAPP0

19,596 posts

204 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
Ho ho ho

Yes, of course... rolleyes

boyse7en

6,738 posts

166 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
Ho ho ho

Yes, of course... rolleyes
Could be. Years I got fed up with a bloke at work so added his website to all sorts of websites/spam senders. Hours of fun. Don't think AM was one of them.... whistle

roachcoach

3,975 posts

156 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
CAPP0 said:
Ho ho ho

Yes, of course... rolleyes
Could be. Years I got fed up with a bloke at work so added his website to all sorts of websites/spam senders. Hours of fun. Don't think AM was one of them.... whistle
Yeah but I'd think she'd probably notice the welcome/registration email and maybe have done something about it....

boyse7en

6,738 posts

166 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
roachcoach said:
Yeah but I'd think she'd probably notice the welcome/registration email and maybe have done something about it....
That's true...

In the old days you didn't have to do a confirmation check on sites to register.

roachcoach

3,975 posts

156 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
roachcoach said:
Yeah but I'd think she'd probably notice the welcome/registration email and maybe have done something about it....
That's true...

In the old days you didn't have to do a confirmation check on sites to register.
There was no confirmation on these apparently. But there's BOUND to be a welcome mail.

Now me, I might actually not think twice about it because a) I'm divorced and b) I'm not a politician.

It's that last one, they know full well the scrutiny they can be subject to. If someone falsely signs you up to a site of dubious intent, you'd HAVE to go get that squelched asap.

Nah, I'm firmly on the side of "hacked by 3rd party to add your details my fking arse" viewpoint where she is concerned.

jshell

11,027 posts

206 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
roachcoach said:
boyse7en said:
roachcoach said:
Yeah but I'd think she'd probably notice the welcome/registration email and maybe have done something about it....
That's true...

In the old days you didn't have to do a confirmation check on sites to register.
There was no confirmation on these apparently. But there's BOUND to be a welcome mail.

Now me, I might actually not think twice about it because a) I'm divorced and b) I'm not a politician.

It's that last one, they know full well the scrutiny they can be subject to. If someone falsely signs you up to a site of dubious intent, you'd HAVE to go get that squelched asap.

Nah, I'm firmly on the side of "hacked by 3rd party to add your details my fking arse" viewpoint where she is concerned.
Agreed. You wouldn't let a mail like that go un-dealt with.

There was a guy hiring trucks in Houston using my e-mail address and I cracked down on that very firmly indeed!

CAPP0

19,596 posts

204 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
roachcoach said:
boyse7en said:
CAPP0 said:
Ho ho ho

Yes, of course... rolleyes
Could be. Years I got fed up with a bloke at work so added his website to all sorts of websites/spam senders. Hours of fun. Don't think AM was one of them.... whistle
Yeah but I'd think she'd probably notice the welcome/registration email and maybe have done something about it....
I thought her response was very detailed and thought out for someone who would only have had a few minutes to prepare it, having been taken completely by surprise by the news that her email address was on the list...

theboss

6,919 posts

220 months

Thursday 20th August 2015
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
I thought her response was very detailed and thought out for someone who would only have had a few minutes to prepare it, having been taken completely by surprise by the news that her email address was on the list...
I thought the same.

I see many of the wweb front ends which were rushed out yesterday have been shut down under threat of legal action by the site owners... of course that is not to say they won't persist and/or be hosted elsewhere in the world. I should think that identifiable people publicly broadcasting leaked database contents on twitter, etc. are on dodgy ground too - it is stolen data afterall.

I also see its a main story on all the UK news sites but not so much in the US and elsewhere. A manifestation of our propensity for schadenfreude, perhaps?

Edited by theboss on Thursday 20th August 13:59