Will overuled by judge

[mondeoman]

Ali G said:

mondeoman said:

I can't understand why people don't understand that what's mine is none of theirs, or anyone else's, business. It's mine, and if I want to leave it to the royal lets fk off to Jupiter society and not my kids, then that's the way it's going to be.

As for inheritance tax, ps off, you had your cut, what's left is mine to do with as I please - see above.

Single then?

No offspring?

I understand - it's all yours!

Actually no, married with 4, but hey go ahead and assume and miss the point by a country mile. Its my money, earned by me, tax paid by me, mine to do with as I please - piss up the wall, leave to the fairies or give to my kids - but its MY choice, not yours, not the governments, and not a judges.

[sugerbear]

jimmybobby said:

sugerbear said:

As a taxpayer it's the right decision.

A nice chunk of benefits will be removed, the housing association gets some capital to re-invest in another house (I hope).

quote from the judgement - "the appellant received tax credits and benefits of £13,204 per year consisting of £8,112 tax credit, plus £5,092 housing and council tax benefit"

Taxpayer 1 - 0 Spiteful Mother

You assume she will come off benefits I bet she doesnt. She has spent most of her lief on benefits from how I read it which is part of the reason here mother disowned her as she felt her husband was a waste of space who had no desire to work or earn what he has.

She won't be able to claim housing benefit for a start. That must be a good £4000 she won't be receiving. The rest of the benefits are pretty typical for a low income family with children. They must be working to claim tax credits.