Blackbushe Airport plane crash

Author
Discussion

soad

32,895 posts

176 months

Saturday 1st August 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Thread running in the planes section.
Aircraft down at Blackbushe?


otolith

56,132 posts

204 months

Saturday 1st August 2015
quotequote all
Yeah, but the plane spotters section of PH is a bit off the beaten track, and it's probably full of people posting flight paths and model numbers.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Rather narrow minded of you. At least on that forum you get technically knowledgeable people who know a bit about aircraft and aviation. As well as the "enthusiasts" (like me) there are a number of extremely knowledgeable commercial pilots, RAF pilots and ex-RAF/RN aircrew etc.

And you don't tend to get wild conspiracy theories flying about.

numtumfutunch

4,723 posts

138 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Rather narrow minded of you. At least on that forum you get technically knowledgeable people who know a bit about aircraft and aviation. As well as the "enthusiasts" (like me) there are a number of extremely knowledgeable commercial pilots, RAF pilots and ex-RAF/RN aircrew etc.

And you don't tend to get wild conspiracy theories flying about.
Agreed
Its one of my favourite "lurking" bits of PH

otolith

56,132 posts

204 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Yeah, that's the problem. It's a more specialised audience with more specialised interests.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Where you might learn something and probably learn more about an incident than through reading mainstream media.

I sometimes wonder if people feel intimidated by those who actually know things. And they then express this feeling of inadequacy by being rude and abusive.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Where you might learn something and probably learn more about an incident than through reading mainstream media.

I sometimes wonder if people feel intimidated by those who actually know things. And they then express this feeling of inadequacy by being rude and abusive.
The modern disease, Eric.

I am lacking knowledge in so many areas, economics and science are good examples, but PH has really educated me and helped me 'up my game'. For me, learning something new at 52 is just as exciting as learning at school. Unfortunately some people think they know it all once they leave full time education and are happy to live in ignorance or even thrive on it with their abuse. That's just sad, imo.

Eric Mc

122,031 posts

265 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
I love learning and like finding out things I didn't know previously. I can't understand why people react so badly when a piece of genuine information is imparted.

Weird.

VernalEquinox

142 posts

211 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Where you might learn something and probably learn more about an incident than through reading mainstream media.

I sometimes wonder if people feel intimidated by those who actually know things. And they then express this feeling of inadequacy by being rude and abusive.
Depends if they've asked for the information or if it's being given without being required (or sometimes being particularly relevant). There's a fine line between informative and smug.

BrabusMog

20,149 posts

186 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I love learning and like finding out things I didn't know previously. I can't understand why people react so badly when a piece of genuine information is imparted.

Weird.
I don't think people react badly, but I have seen some pretty scolding posts when people ask about acronyms etc in some sections of PH, or just a bit of a smug tone to some posts (not all) which tends to give "outsiders" of certain forum groups a bad impression...

I like the best of both worlds, so I just read the threads I don't understand and let the experts do the talking.

otolith

56,132 posts

204 months

Sunday 2nd August 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Where you might learn something and probably learn more about an incident than through reading mainstream media.

I sometimes wonder if people feel intimidated by those who actually know things. And they then express this feeling of inadequacy by being rude and abusive.
The interesting factors for the general public in this story are social. Not the minutiae of aviation. You could quite easily have had multiple legitimate topics for the Munich air disaster or the crash that killed Buddy Holly, the aviation section not being particularly appropriate for the discussion of football and music respectively.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
BrabusMog said:
I don't think people react badly, but I have seen some pretty scolding posts when people ask about acronyms etc in some sections of PH, or just a bit of a smug tone to some posts (not all) which tends to give "outsiders" of certain forum groups a bad impression...
+1. There are some potentially interesting threads where you dare not ask for clarification for fear of the armchair expert stasi.

KTF

9,805 posts

150 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all

bitchstewie

51,210 posts

210 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
That doesn't look like a "something went a little weong" that looks like a "why on earth would you carry on the landing" doesn't it?

KTF

9,805 posts

150 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
That doesn't look like a "something went a little weong" that looks like a "why on earth would you carry on the landing" doesn't it?
It does look that way. Why he didnt go around is anyones guess as he must have known that it wasnt looking good from a few miles out.

Digga

40,320 posts

283 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
KTF said:
bhstewie said:
That doesn't look like a "something went a little weong" that looks like a "why on earth would you carry on the landing" doesn't it?
It does look that way. Why he didnt go around is anyones guess as he must have known that it wasnt looking good from a few miles out.
report said:
descended at up to 3,000 feet per minute
Sounds more like the sort of trajectory you'd associate with a Stuka.

number 46

1,019 posts

248 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
At 50 knots over the correct landing speed he was never going to stop before the end of the runway. Wonder if the pilot passed out or was incapaicted, it does seem odd that he didn't go round again?

Slartifartfast

2,119 posts

232 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
Are preliminary reports usually public as quickly as this?
Are the Carfest and BigginHill ones out too?

NailedOn

3,114 posts

235 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
The report viewable via the HMG link states that at least one or perhaps two microlights were in the immediate vicinity. The Jet took at least one avoiding manoeuvre.
Nonetheless PH-ers operating in a fact vacuum jump to baseless guesswork. Whatever it is you do for a living, so help me God if I ever need you. Skinny latte anyone?
Oh, you're a retired SAS officer now working for a private covert ops outfit. Yep, Right. Dream on you planks.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
Slartifartfast said:
Are preliminary reports usually public as quickly as this?
Are the Carfest and BigginHill ones out too?
I think they only do them for crashes where the press can get carried away with things without some concrete information. With this one there was always the potential for conspiracy theories so it makes sense that they would release this info early, once they had a fairly clear idea what was going on.