RBS shares (5%) being sold- too cheap?

RBS shares (5%) being sold- too cheap?

Author
Discussion

nikaiyo2

4,732 posts

195 months

Tuesday 4th August 2015
quotequote all
Du1point8 said:
Brown didn't need to wait until rock bottom... Winky caused it by announcing to the market, that he was going to flood the market with UK gold, even though we didn't need the money and there was no reason to do it.

Osbourne just needs to keep it quiet so the share price doesnt artificially drop just before selling, unlike the loud mouth tt Winky.
We did need the money, it was essential to give the public sector massive pay rises for a decade, pensions that they don't even contribute 20% of the value too, limitless sick pay etc. It was needed to ensure a fairer society, you know ending relative child poverty, so less children are living in households with an income of... Socialist spouting here... In the real world it was needed for client state votes, NOTHING was more important to the s Blair and Brown than votes.

drainbrain

5,637 posts

111 months

Tuesday 4th August 2015
quotequote all
As an ex-RBS customer can I say it is a disgusting organisation. I earnestly hope that once all the people it swindled have been compensated its shares sink to zero and it finally comes to an end.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

158 months

Tuesday 4th August 2015
quotequote all
oyster said:
So Osborne has a choice:

1. Sell the whole 81% stake at 330p now (or likely less than 330p, as he'd need to offer a discount so someone could underwrite it).
2. Sell some at 330p now to bring down the Government's ownership and allow the bank to free itself from the shackles, make some bigger profits and see if the share price rises to allow further sales at higher prices.
3. Wait and see if the share price rises, continuing to pay interest on the money being borrowed to maintain the stake and keeping the shackles on the bank, but hoping somehow it can conjure up more profit that way.

If you were chancellor (and left in this mess by the previous Labour government) what would you do?
Thank you for the clear explanation.

Cliftonite

8,408 posts

138 months

Tuesday 4th August 2015
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
As an ex-RBS customer can I say it is a disgusting organisation. I earnestly hope that once all the people it swindled have been compensated its shares sink to zero and it finally comes to an end.
What makes you think we will ever be compensated? They appear even to have got off scot free (see what I did there?) with their crooked +/or incompetent rights issue prospectus.

bds!





Pan Pan Pan

9,905 posts

111 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
Last night labour`s shadow finance minister Rachel Reeve, was on the news whingeing that this weeks sale of some of the government holdings in RBS had cost the UK taxpayer 1 billion pounds.

Quite how she, and Harperson could do this with a straight face, knowing that Tony Bliars give away
of a large part of the UK`s EU rebate, has cost the UK taxpayer an average of 3.1 billion EVERY year since, and for eternity (or as long as the EU lasts and we are still in it) and for absolutely NO gain whatsoever for the UK taxpayer, is staggering.

And lets not forget when Gormless Clown sold off 395 tons of the UK`s gold reserves when (for the UK) he did not have to, and managed to lose the UK tax payer 7 BILLION pounds in one go.

As some have pointed out, the tories are not much good for the UK, but in no way are they as disastrous for the UK as the clusterf*ck we know as the labour party.

Edited by Pan Pan Pan on Wednesday 5th August 07:37

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
drainbrain said:
As an ex-RBS customer can I say it is a disgusting organisation. I earnestly hope that once all the people it swindled have been compensated its shares sink to zero and it finally comes to an end.
What makes you think we will ever be compensated? They appear even to have got off scot free (see what I did there?) with their crooked +/or incompetent rights issue prospectus.

bds!
They are being sued for the rights issue at the moment.

Du1point8

21,608 posts

192 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
Last night labour`s shadow finance minister Rachel Reeve, was on the news whingeing that this weeks sale of some of the government holdings in RBS had cost the UK taxpayer 1 billion pounds.

Quite how she, and Harperson could do this with a straight face, knowing that Tony Bliars give away
of a large part of the UK`s EU rebate, has cost the UK taxpayer an average of 3.1 billion EVERY year since, and for eternity (or as long as the EU lasts and we are still in it) and for absolutely NO gain whatsoever for the UK taxpayer, is staggering.

And lets not forget when Gormless Clown sold off 395 tons of the UK`s gold reserves when (for the UK) he did not have to, and managed to lose the UK tax payer 7 BILLION pounds in one go.

As some have pointed out, the tories are not much good for the UK, but in no way are they as disastrous for the UK as the clusterf*ck we know as the labour party.

Edited by Pan Pan Pan on Wednesday 5th August 07:37
Or the tories could be seen to need to offload the shares at market rate as they will never reach the highs at which Labour blundered in and paid for them... what should they do? Hang on for another 10 years in the hope they go back up or use the money elsewhere and take the loss?

Pan Pan Pan

9,905 posts

111 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
Du1point8 said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Last night labour`s shadow finance minister Rachel Reeve, was on the news whingeing that this weeks sale of some of the government holdings in RBS had cost the UK taxpayer 1 billion pounds.

Quite how she, and Harperson could do this with a straight face, knowing that Tony Bliars give away
of a large part of the UK`s EU rebate, has cost the UK taxpayer an average of 3.1 billion EVERY year since, and for eternity (or as long as the EU lasts and we are still in it) and for absolutely NO gain whatsoever for the UK taxpayer, is staggering.

And lets not forget when Gormless Clown sold off 395 tons of the UK`s gold reserves when (for the UK) he did not have to, and managed to lose the UK tax payer 7 BILLION pounds in one go.

As some have pointed out, the tories are not much good for the UK, but in no way are they as disastrous for the UK as the clusterf*ck we know as the labour party.

Edited by Pan Pan Pan on Wednesday 5th August 07:37
Or the tories could be seen to need to offload the shares at market rate as they will never reach the highs at which Labour blundered in and paid for them... what should they do? Hang on for another 10 years in the hope they go back up or use the money elsewhere and take the loss?
Absolutely. It seems a lot of people are looking at the price the shares were sold for this week, but were the shares actually worth the price they were sold to the government for, at the time?

If we could afford to wait indefinitely for the share price to rise back up to what they were bought
at, that `might' be alright, but by that time, the cost of a 3 minute phone call could be 20.000 pounds smile


StevieBee

12,890 posts

255 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
As an ex-RBS customer can I say it is a disgusting organisation.
You can. And I agree. Many times over.

MrBarry123

6,027 posts

121 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
drainbrain said:
As an ex-RBS customer can I say it is a disgusting organisation.
You can. And I agree. Many times over.
Yes but, with all respect, drainbrain is only a customer and knows very little about the inner workings of the bank. To say that it's a "disgusting organisation", with very little evidence other than personal experience as one of quite a few customers, is quite a blanket to cast.

Although I agree that RBS buying ABN Amro as some kind of willy-waving contest against Barclays wasn't a great move.

Ali G

3,526 posts

282 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
'Willy-Waving'

Apparently de-riguer within piggie-class.

Lessons will be learned - (but not in my lifetime)

I blame homo-sapiens.

smile

Edited by Ali G on Wednesday 5th August 20:49

drainbrain

5,637 posts

111 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
Yes but, with all respect, drainbrain is only a customer and knows very little about the inner workings of the bank. To say that it's a "disgusting organisation", with very little evidence other than personal experience as one of quite a few customers, is quite a blanket to cast.
Well, I used to be "only a customer". Now I'm an ex-customer who retains a specialist to give me a bit of insight into "the inner workings of the bank", so I possibly know a bit more than you might want to think. Funnily enough it's largely what's been discovered about their "inner workings" that's begun to loosen their purse strings and recently the first £35k has come my way. Apparently that's just the start of the compen due me for the raping they gave me. Bum like a manhole in my case apparently.

I would urge anyone similarly raped by this top-to-bottom parcel of rogues to engage a specialist (usually an ex-banker) to fight their corner if they're finding it difficult to restore their rights. The scum are well aware how difficult it is for ordinary people to deal with the obstacles and hurdles they (and, sadly, their cronies in glove puppet regulatory authorities, ombudsmen etc) put in the way of compensation. But trust me, persevere with it along with some specialist help. It's not quick, but eventually they crack and pay up.

Edited by drainbrain on Thursday 6th August 00:20