Men discover mythical buried secret Nazi train of gold...

Men discover mythical buried secret Nazi train of gold...

Author
Discussion

LarryLamb

4,319 posts

256 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
OzzyR1 said:
<cynic>
- Spring 2016 - we've done nothing for the last 6 months but only just managed to investigate the area and there is nothing there
</cynic>
That's to give them time to build up the hype, cream off the tourists visiting and increase the visibility of the story/Poland... before it all amounts to nothing. I really hope they do find something though...

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

219 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
treepke said:
Perhaps they should get Tony Robinson and the team in, after all they find things thousands of years old in 3 days.
Yep - things like a Roman temple to Zeus:


treepke

119 posts

105 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
Yep - things like a Roman temple to Zeus:

Don't forget this fella.


Smollet

10,535 posts

190 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all

gothatway

5,783 posts

170 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
That's Gordon, not Thomas ! Duh.

Oakey

27,561 posts

216 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Is he about to announce he's going to sell all that gold in one go?

Digga

40,300 posts

283 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Oakey said:
Is he about to announce he's going to sell all that gold in one go?
rofl

soad

32,882 posts

176 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
It also contain Aliens, forgotten chemical weapons from Iraq, Tony Blair's balls and the missing tapes from Watergate. wink

hornet

6,333 posts

250 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Be interesting if it turns out to be true (gold or not), but is starting to get rather Baltic Sea Anomaly.

irocfan

40,389 posts

190 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Oakey said:
Is he about to announce he's going to sell all that gold in one go?
'course not - no-one's that much of a bellend, oh wait.....

Mr Trophy

6,808 posts

203 months

Rick_1138

3,667 posts

178 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
treepke said:
Moonhawk said:
Yep - things like a Roman temple to Zeus:

Don't forget this fella.

You'll have to enlighten me on these references?

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
This looks too good to be true. Have never seen ground scan images like this before. Sod the gold I want the train


Doh didn't read first looked at PCs now I've read it this is just a shaft. Hmmm,m



Edited by Pesty on Friday 4th September 13:36

TEKNOPUG

18,943 posts

205 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
Mr Trophy said:
So just that I understand: they have released an image captured by GPR, that shows a "shaft" that descends from around 10m beneath the ground, to 50m below ground. And from that they have deduced that this is evidence of a missing "Nazi Gold Train"?

Call me an old romantic but I was kinda hoping for a GPR image of oh, I dunno, say, a train?

Dan_1981

17,382 posts

199 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
That shaft is where the train WAS!

It was parked vertically using Nazi rocket technology.

They've removed the train for their own safety.

TEKNOPUG

18,943 posts

205 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
To clarify, the typical maximum sustained gradient that a steam train could be expect to travel, is 4%. Some slightly more, some less. If this is ann amroured train, you'd expect it to be very heavy, so perhaps 4% is generous but no matter.

What this means is that the gradient cannot exceed 1:25. If the image is the "train" and it begins at 10m and continues to a depth of 50m+, the train will need to be 1km long! Even if the "train" does not start until the 20m mark, it would still need to be 750m long in order to negotiate a 1:25 gradient and descend 30m.....

TEKNOPUG

18,943 posts

205 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
drivetrain said:
On a vaguely related topic, I've never understood the principle of armoured trains, OK they would be largely immune to small arms attack but a small amount of explosives strategically placed on the track would disable it, even from the air it would be far from safe even with armour, AA guns etc.
The train may be disabled by explosives but it would be able to defend itself until reinforcements were able to extradite whatever valuable cargo it was carrying. It would also prevent the train from being hijacked. Trying to get a direct hit on a moving train using dumb weapons from the air is pretty difficult. Hence the vast majority of air attacks would be gun/cannon strafing.

No idea how effective they were.

Luke Warm

496 posts

144 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all

Asterix

24,438 posts

228 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
To clarify, the typical maximum sustained gradient that a steam train could be expect to travel, is 4%. Some slightly more, some less. If this is ann amroured train, you'd expect it to be very heavy, so perhaps 4% is generous but no matter.

What this means is that the gradient cannot exceed 1:25. If the image is the "train" and it begins at 10m and continues to a depth of 50m+, the train will need to be 1km long! Even if the "train" does not start until the 20m mark, it would still need to be 750m long in order to negotiate a 1:25 gradient and descend 30m.....
If if it exists it will have been cramed down vertically in wagonloads. It won't have been like Chuggington. You build a shaft and lower it, wagon taken off and rolled away. Empty back up. Rinse and repeat...... We apparently hid the Crown Jewels down a Welsh mine in the Second World War in a similar manner....

I doubt even zorin industries would have been able to construct a proper line like that without hundreds of people knowing about it
Bury them with the train?

TEKNOPUG

18,943 posts

205 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
To clarify, the typical maximum sustained gradient that a steam train could be expect to travel, is 4%. Some slightly more, some less. If this is ann amroured train, you'd expect it to be very heavy, so perhaps 4% is generous but no matter.

What this means is that the gradient cannot exceed 1:25. If the image is the "train" and it begins at 10m and continues to a depth of 50m+, the train will need to be 1km long! Even if the "train" does not start until the 20m mark, it would still need to be 750m long in order to negotiate a 1:25 gradient and descend 30m.....
If if it exists it will have been cramed down vertically in wagonloads. It won't have been like Chuggington. You build a shaft and lower it, wagon taken off and rolled away. Empty back up. Rinse and repeat...... We apparently hid the Crown Jewels down a Welsh mine in the Second World War in a similar manner....

I doubt even zorin industries would have been able to construct a proper line like that without hundreds of people knowing about it
So it won't even be the train itself that is found but rather the contents?