Looks like there are a lot of benefit fraudsters out there..

Looks like there are a lot of benefit fraudsters out there..

Author
Discussion

Jasandjules

Original Poster:

69,862 posts

229 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2015/08/27/known-num...

I don't know if it is true but if it is, it would appear many people have died simply to claim benefits..............

kowalski655

14,631 posts

143 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
It will make IDS happy-at least when they are dead they cant claim smile

wolves_wanderer

12,373 posts

237 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
People too ill to work die at a greater rate than healthy people. Stop the presses

wc98

10,360 posts

140 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
i would have thought the majority of posters in this forum would be happy at an increase in the death rate of "scroungers" as they are often described.
strange how other groups (business owners,landed gentry to name but two) that receive significant tax payer subsidies for many things ordinary people have to fork out on their own for, are never classed as the same. funny old world.

kowalski655

14,631 posts

143 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
wolves_wanderer said:
People too ill to work die at a greater rate than healthy people. Stop the presses
But odd that the people found to be fit for some work,and so of the long term benefits list, also die off at a higher rate!

wolves_wanderer

12,373 posts

237 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
wolves_wanderer said:
People too ill to work die at a greater rate than healthy people. Stop the presses
But odd that the people found to be fit for some work,and so of the long term benefits list, also die off at a higher rate!
I don't know but when the article states

article said:
For example, the work-related activity group is composed entirely of people who are expected to recover from their illnesses and be well enough to return to work within a year. In that group, there should be no deaths at all – barring accidents. Why have nearly 10,000 people lost their lives after being assigned there?
It makes me assume that they don't have any more idea than me.

andymadmak

14,545 posts

270 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
wc98 said:
i would have thought the majority of posters in this forum would be happy at an increase in the death rate of "scroungers" as they are often described.
.
Then it is quite clear that you really do not understand the mindset of the "majority of posters in this forum"

wc98

10,360 posts

140 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
andymadmak said:
Then it is quite clear that you really do not understand the mindset of the "majority of posters in this forum"
hmm,quite possible ,maybe many posters rather than the majority would have been more appropriate.

Jasandjules

Original Poster:

69,862 posts

229 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
wolves_wanderer said:
People too ill to work die at a greater rate than healthy people. Stop the presses
Actually, people declared fit for work or too well for ill health benefits die.........

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
30,000 deaths a year.

Total deaths somewhere above 500,000.

So around 5% or so are claiming.


Population of uk around 60 million.

Numbers claiming some form of incapacity benefit - around 3 million.

So around 5% or so are claiming.

scratchchin


r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
100% of people die.

article said:
the work-related activity group is composed entirely of people who are expected to recover from their illnesses and be well enough to return to work within a year. In that group, there should be no deaths at all – barring accidents.
That statement says enough to completely discredit any analysis or conclusions the author has drawn. What he is saying is that if you are in the 'work related activity group' you are immune from death by natural causes.

bks!

Edited by r11co on Thursday 27th August 12:36

FredClogs

14,041 posts

161 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
Tory evolutionary theory, survival of the richest.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
The Incapacity Benefit/ESA reforms have been a major fk up by the government. They've missed target after target. Even the Disability Living Allowance to Personal Independence Payment transition hasn't gone as planned. It seems they've made a lot of 'reforms' but very little money has actually been saved.

http://www.niesr.ac.uk/blog/welfare-savings-and-in...

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Tory evolutionary theory, survival of the richest.
That is what the article is attempting to assert through statistical fraudery.

Murph7355

37,683 posts

256 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
wc98 said:
...
strange how other groups (business owners,landed gentry to name but two) that receive significant tax payer subsidies for many things ordinary people have to fork out on their own for, are never classed as the same. funny old world.
Do you have examples of what they get that you want? And why you aren't a business owner?


walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Actually, people declared fit for work or too well for ill health benefits die.........
In other news, ACTUAL WORKERS also die.

iphonedyou

9,240 posts

157 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Tory evolutionary theory, survival of the richest.
You don't have a clue, fella.

esxste

3,674 posts

106 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
It's not hard to understand the reality of the situation. Government has employed a private company to check peoples eligibility for Incapacity/disability benefits in order to cut fraudulent claims and save money. This company charges for this service. In order to ensure savings are made, a certain amount of people need to be kicked off the benefit.

It doesn't really matter if some of those people do actually need the benefit.

loafer123

15,423 posts

215 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all

I had an interesting discussion in the US.

Apparently one state brought in a requirement that to receive food stamps you had to do voluntary work for 9.5 hours a week and 85% of people withdrew their claims.


Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Thursday 27th August 2015
quotequote all
esxste said:
It's not hard to understand the reality of the situation.
You mean it's not hard to make up hysterical stories, and in that you're right.