Police Scotland Object to Armed Forces Being Armed

Police Scotland Object to Armed Forces Being Armed

Author
Discussion

No Bend

591 posts

122 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
TheRainMaker said:
1. Use the Police who have Guns and good training but will have probably never fired them in real life, looking after you.
Never fired them? Do they just show them powerpoint videos on how they work and hope they don't freak out when the thing goes bang?

hidetheelephants

24,279 posts

193 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
AndrewEH1 said:
It's all about the acceptable level of risk.

Fast roping is, well, fast. The sooner you are off the rope the sooner you can kill/capture the pirates without getting shot/killed yourself

The risk is that you might fall off the rope and be injured or worse.

The acceptable level of risk for doing it at the Tattoo was obviously too high for Historic Scotland just to entertain a bunch of tourists.
How do the marines learn fast roping? By doing it again and again and again until they can do it blindfolded, in the dark while being shot at. Transplanting this to the arena in front of Embra castle doesn't change the risk profile. Quite what liability HS thought they might be incurring is not clear.

0000

13,812 posts

191 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Maybe they have said that if the marines have access to alcohol, then weapons are inappropriate.
I'm not aware that marines have the greatest intellectual reputation, but in the last however many hundred years I'd imagine they've managed to figure that one out. Maybe you should call them up and check they've thought of it, just in case.

TheRainMaker

6,334 posts

242 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
No Bend said:
TheRainMaker said:
1. Use the Police who have Guns and good training but will have probably never fired them in real life, looking after you.
Never fired them? Do they just show them powerpoint videos on how they work and hope they don't freak out when the thing goes bang?
Erm "real life" i.e. not in a training facility :roll eyes:

Derek Smith

45,652 posts

248 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
0000 said:
Derek Smith said:
Maybe they have said that if the marines have access to alcohol, then weapons are inappropriate.
I'm not aware that marines have the greatest intellectual reputation, but in the last however many hundred years I'd imagine they've managed to figure that one out. Maybe you should call them up and check they've thought of it, just in case.
Sorry to be so obscure. I just assumed others might have worked it out for themselves, but apparently not.

If alcohol is available at this public gathering, then the mere fact might well be enough to render the possession of weapons by anyone, shotguns by the gentry or assault weapons by the military, against the regulations. D'you see? Nothing against the marines, but similarly there should be nothing against any regulations.


ruggedscotty

5,626 posts

209 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
little war going on here..... police trying to get the upper hand.. Guess someone said something to someome and upset them....

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
ruggedscotty said:
little war going on here..... police trying to get the upper hand.. Guess someone said something to someome and upset them....
Yes, that's how assessments work. They are driven by 'someone saying something to upset them'...

TheRainMaker said:
No Bend said:
TheRainMaker said:
1. Use the Police who have Guns and good training but will have probably never fired them in real life, looking after you.
Never fired them? Do they just show them powerpoint videos on how they work and hope they don't freak out when the thing goes bang?
Erm "real life" i.e. not in a training facility :roll eyes:
In a war zone I'd rather have the Marines. Domestically, with the firearms scenarios that are probable to occur, I'd rather have the police.


hidetheelephants

24,279 posts

193 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
La Liga said:
ruggedscotty said:
little war going on here..... police trying to get the upper hand.. Guess someone said something to someome and upset them....
Yes, that's how assessments work. They are driven by 'someone saying something to upset them'...

TheRainMaker said:
No Bend said:
TheRainMaker said:
1. Use the Police who have Guns and good training but will have probably never fired them in real life, looking after you.
Never fired them? Do they just show them powerpoint videos on how they work and hope they don't freak out when the thing goes bang?
Erm "real life" i.e. not in a training facility :roll eyes:
In a war zone I'd rather have the Marines. Domestically, with the firearms scenarios that are probable to occur, I'd rather have the police.
What has any of that got to do with the booties doing a demonstration infantry attack? Doing it without blanks and pyro will be singularly lacking in spectacle, which rather defeats the purpose of them doing a demo at the air show. This isn't safety it's the fun police taking over.

creampuff

6,511 posts

143 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
This is just one of those stories which is so weird, I don't know where to start.

Scotland is a really strange place.

wc98

10,391 posts

140 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
creampuff said:
This is just one of those stories which is so weird, I don't know where to start.

Scotland is a really strange place.
not that strange,the people running the show however are a bunch of complete and utter fkwits .

wc98

10,391 posts

140 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
AndrewEH1 said:
Doing a show for a thousand people a night for a month for the Edinburgh Tattoo is a little different to killing pirates...

Historic Scotland were well within their rights to ensure that their part of the show was carried out safely and in good taste.

Edited by AndrewEH1 on Thursday 3rd September 16:02
have there ever been any instances of armed forces personnel injuring members of the public during this type of demonstration ? ,genuine question, i do not know.
i would imagine the type of person that is a senior historic scotland official would probably st themselves at the sound of a firework going off nearby, never mind the marines demo stuff ,and their personal attitude to danger would involve a hard hat and harness to climb a step ladder in the library, so an understandable reaction.

the marines train to the very highest of standards for a reason. unlike most of us,if they make a mistake it could not only cost them their own life, but the lives of many others. i seriously doubt a public demonstration where they are not in a high risk situation and they have time to rehearse is likely to lead to any risk to the public.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
What has any of that got to do with the booties doing a demonstration infantry attack? Doing it without blanks and pyro will be singularly lacking in spectacle, which rather defeats the purpose of them doing a demo at the air show. This isn't safety it's the fun police taking over.
Nothing, it's to do with specific posts which deviate slightly from the original topic.

My first reply on page 1 is directly about the OP's post.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
What has any of that got to do with the booties doing a demonstration infantry attack? Doing it without blanks and pyro will be singularly lacking in spectacle, which rather defeats the purpose of them doing a demo at the air show. This isn't safety it's the fun police taking over.
You can't really blame the police, they were planning to do the demonstration where a police dog jumps some bloke with a blanket on his arm and then jumps through a hoola hoop. No wonder they didn't want loads of marines firing machine guns and having cool explosions and smoke going off. hehe

These demonstrations are great, they're a recruiting vehicle for the RMs like the red arrows is for the RAF.

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west...

You know it's been given the go-ahead, right?
Some compromises have been made apparently but it was on the 6pm news that it would go ahead

ruggedscotty

5,626 posts

209 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
There will now be no rapid gunfire and planned explosions have been scaled back.....

Thing is that it was a show - a way to give something to the viewing public that demonstrates the army and what they do. Its amazing that the number of people that have no first hand experience of just what goes on. This would give them albeit a demo a little taster of the activities of the armed forces....

It would be good to see the police objections and reasoning behind such views especially in light of how they are struggling with their own operations....

I honestly dont see what the fuss was about to tell you the truth.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
ruggedscotty said:
Thing is that it was a show - a way to give something to the viewing public that demonstrates the army and what they do
Marines is Navy, clue's in the name.

Asterix

24,438 posts

228 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
I was going to say, if it was an Army display and a taster of what they do on a day-to-day basis, they'd be watching a two hour demonstration on how to sweep stuff up while nursing a hangover that would kill ten men.

Edited by Asterix on Friday 4th September 09:10

MikeGTi

2,505 posts

201 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
They could always demonstrate how to count tents.. it would be in-tents! BOOM TISH.

getmecoat

MrBarry123

6,027 posts

121 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
This of course being the Police force that don't like investigating car crashes and instead leave the victims residing (dying) in the car for a few days?

Smollet

10,556 posts

190 months

Friday 4th September 2015
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
This of course being the Police force that don't like investigating car crashes and instead leave the victims residing (dying) in the car for a few days?
If they'd been carrying guns it might have been different.