Joyless feminism
Discussion
iphonedyou said:
FredClogs said:
He's a post middle aged, upper middle class, senior lawyer with a hyphenated surname, probably drives an Audi - he's used to people pretending to be nice to him, probably has no idea what a fkwit he really is.
You really are an absolute cretin, Matt.How you have the time to post this uninformed nonsense while presumably busy putting the finishing touches to your utopian 0% tax below £100k and 100% tax above £100k regime is beyond me.
iphonedyou said:
You really are an absolute cretin, Matt.
How you have the time to post this uninformed nonsense while presumably busy putting the finishing touches to your utopian 0% tax below £100k and 100% tax above £100k regime is beyond me.
Just to check: you're not keen on retard, but you're happy with cretin?How you have the time to post this uninformed nonsense while presumably busy putting the finishing touches to your utopian 0% tax below £100k and 100% tax above £100k regime is beyond me.
iphonedyou said:
TTwiggy said:
Just to check: you're not keen on retard, but you're happy with cretin?
I have no objection to either, frankly. But then, if you'd read all of the posts, you'd have seen I was rather opposed to heehaw's position from the off.thismonkeyhere said:
No, but she could just have accepted a compliment and moved on to something more important. Some work for example.
I'm not a Cambridge educated lawyer, but to me she sounds like the sort of fking idiot who does more harm than good for the feminist cause.
Have to agree; just stick him in the mental 'letch' folder if you don't like the possible undertones of his message.I'm not a Cambridge educated lawyer, but to me she sounds like the sort of fking idiot who does more harm than good for the feminist cause.
She was the ruder of the two.
TTwiggy said:
Oh, I have read them all. I just thought I might join in on the 'it's ironic you say x when you use words like y' circle jerk.
It's ironic because he sprung to the defence of what he perceives to be those maligned by white male privilege, including minorities, then used a pejorative term with a root in describing such a minority.That I took no such position in defence of same rather means there's no irony in my post. No requirement to jerk, thankfully.
iphonedyou said:
TTwiggy said:
Oh, I have read them all. I just thought I might join in on the 'it's ironic you say x when you use words like y' circle jerk.
It's ironic because he sprung to the defence of what he perceives to be those maligned by white male privilege, including minorities, then used a pejorative term with a root in describing such a minority.That I took no such position in defence of same rather means there's no irony in my post. No requirement to jerk, thankfully.
HewManHeMan said:
iphonedyou said:
TTwiggy said:
Oh, I have read them all. I just thought I might join in on the 'it's ironic you say x when you use words like y' circle jerk.
It's ironic because he sprung to the defence of what he perceives to be those maligned by white male privilege, including minorities, then used a pejorative term with a root in describing such a minority.That I took no such position in defence of same rather means there's no irony in my post. No requirement to jerk, thankfully.
thismonkeyhere said:
Justayellowbadge said:
She's a human rights brief, currently studying FGM.
He cannot seriously have thought she'd giggle coyly and blush in girlish excitement?
No, but she could just have accepted a compliment and moved on to something more important. Some work for example.He cannot seriously have thought she'd giggle coyly and blush in girlish excitement?
I'm not a Cambridge educated lawyer, but to me she sounds like the sort of fking idiot who does more harm than good for the feminist cause.
As a side note, I love the comments
turnitoffthenon said:
Personally I would have ripped him a new one for his spelling "Always interest to understant" Bet he's on 50k+ a year as well
And the rest Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff