Joyless feminism

[ClaphamGT3]

I'm more interested to know whether the picture is showing the profile owners head or body, because they aren't the same person

[Mr Snrub]

So why is it men have to wear a dinner jacket to these type of events but women can get away with clothing like that? Seems a bit of a sexist double standard to me

[Mothersruin]

She knows exactly what she was doing, well played you could argue.

[Mr Snrub]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I could post the pictures online, then sell my story about being attacked by heartless internet trolls to the Mail

[don'tbesilly]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

[Smiler.]

Don't look at me

[Poss NSFW]

[Halb]

I had an inkling that this might pop up here.


PH, DM-lite for the more discerning troglodyte

[768]

They were being generous. She's rivals that Neighbours actress.

[irocfan]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

you may well be correct in your assessment about not being a dog frightner - but I still wouldn't. I think the phrase these days is 'entitled' - I suspect she'd be a MASSIVE P.i.T.A. or in PH parlance "a snake with tits"

[mondeoman]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Harh harh har , me? A male model? What have you been drinking?

[xjay1337]

Point is, I think she has dressed in a somewhat flaunting fashion. Which exposes her boobs, legs, curves. And then she moans about it people are complementing her.

You can wear what you like but if you wore nothing but one of those woooly hats you get on bottles of Innocent Smoothies covering your bell end you would certainly expect some comments.

[bitchstewie]

xjay1337 said:

Point is, I think she has dressed in a somewhat flaunting fashion. Which exposes her boobs, legs, curves. And then she moans about it people are complementing her.

Do you seriously believe that?

I'm no feminist but there's a world of difference between looking and thinking "Nice tits" to yourself vs. going on LinkedIn (which has its faults but is supposed to be a business/professional network) and writing it.

If nothing else you'd have to be a giant idiot given it's probably the first place any potential employer will look for info on you these days.

[Halb]

bhstewie said:

Do you seriously believe that?

I'm no feminist but there's a world of difference between looking and thinking "Nice tits" to yourself vs. going on LinkedIn (which has its faults but is supposed to be a business/professional network) and writing it.

If nothing else you'd have to be a giant idiot given it's probably the first place any potential employer will look for info on you these days.

Exactly.

[xjay1337]

Yes I agree to say nice tits is wrong.

To say "stunning pic" or "you look great", not so much.

[Evolved]

mondeoman said:

EYE wouldn't - you can guarantee that under all that muck there's a very average face with a wk personality.

I don't need to see it minus the muck (it's troweled on), she is average looking at best anyway and is blatantly flaunting her 'assets' to distract from that fact.

It's a crazy world we live in nowadays and the simplest of things seem to offend people and it's then blasted all across social media as a 'look at me' statement.

[rxtx]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

She hasn't done that herself though, that's a standard Mail Online watermark.

I only know because they published one of my photos once and they did the same.

[Mr Snrub]

rxtx said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

She hasn't done that herself though, that's a standard Mail Online watermark.

I only know because they published one of my photos once and they did the same.

But not so offended about people seeing her photos that she sells her story to one of the most visited news websites around

[rxtx]

Mr Snrub said:

But not so offended about people seeing her photos that she sells her story to one of the most visited news websites around

I'm not bothered either way, but I had no idea a photo I'd entered into a completely unrelated competition was going to be published there so I've no doubt she had no idea either, "news" is circulated.

I did a reverse image search on my photo and the same article was on websites all over the world and translated into Japanese, Chinese, Thai ...

[Mr Snrub]

rxtx said:

Mr Snrub said:

But not so offended about people seeing her photos that she sells her story to one of the most visited news websites around

I'm not bothered either way, but I had no idea a photo I'd entered into a completely unrelated competition was going to be published there so I've no doubt she had no idea either, "news" is circulated.

I did a reverse image search on my photo and the same article was on websites all over the world and translated into Japanese, Chinese, Thai ...

There's a direct quote from her to the Mail in the article. Maybe she should wear a turtleneck in future photos if she's that offended about comments?

[rxtx]

Mr Snrub said:

There's a direct quote from her to the Mail in the article. Maybe she should wear a turtleneck in future photos if she's that offended about comments?

Don't know, ask her, like I said, I couldn't really care less