Half a million VWs recalled, sneaky emissions software.

Half a million VWs recalled, sneaky emissions software.

Author
Discussion

MarshPhantom

Original Poster:

9,658 posts

137 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
The US Govt has asked VW to recall 500000 Diesel engined vehicles after it was found the engine management knew when the engine was under test and the software reduced the emissions to pass the strict anti pollution regs they have in the States.

Unable to post a link, but this could be interesting.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
DPF regeneration maybe? It'll be interesting to see.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
Oh dear. They will probably get a severe rogering if this turns out to be true.


PorkInsider

5,882 posts

141 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
Interesting, but will this not be similar to what motorcycle manufacturers used to do to pass noise tests?

I don't know if the same test still applies but they used to have to accelerate bikes flat out in 2nd from 30mph over a set distance of 100ft and the max noise level was measured over the run.

As a result, 90s 'superbike' class bikes used to be factory fitted with a huge flat-spot in the mapping to cover this off so that they didn't hit peak torque, and hence peak noise, during the run.

It's nothing new to find automotive companies working around test parameters.

MarshPhantom

Original Poster:

9,658 posts

137 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
Cheers.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
The thing about the USA they have the balls to stand up to companies. i dirve a diesel but they are not good cars for the health of others. The right thing is to tax deisel more and bring petrol prices down, to ensure better emissions. Labour where the ones who gave diesel a tax break and ended up how we are now in the uk.

The USA rightly are not a fan of diesel.

MarshPhantom

Original Poster:

9,658 posts

137 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
Yes, I was amazed there's half a million diesels in the US.


Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Yes, I was amazed there's half a million diesels in the US.
They quite like their diesels in their bro dozers.



I think the U.S. Will look very hard into rogering vw if there is one thing they don't like its domestic manufacturers losing out to 'corruption' that's how they will spin it

MarshPhantom

Original Poster:

9,658 posts

137 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
Pesty said:
MarshPhantom said:
Yes, I was amazed there's half a million diesels in the US.
They quite like their diesels in their bro dozers.



Sure I read somewhere about the first diesel car introduced in America suffered terrible engine problems, and diesel got a bad reputation that it struggled to shake off.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
Might be true I don't know.

I spend a bit of time on us forums arguments over diesel or petrol trucks come up often. Quite a few championing diesel.

They even have forums dedicated just to diesel

Cyder

7,045 posts

220 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
PorkInsider said:
Interesting, but will this not be similar to what motorcycle manufacturers used to do to pass noise tests?

I don't know if the same test still applies but they used to have to accelerate bikes flat out in 2nd from 30mph over a set distance of 100ft and the max noise level was measured over the run.

As a result, 90s 'superbike' class bikes used to be factory fitted with a huge flat-spot in the mapping to cover this off so that they didn't hit peak torque, and hence peak noise, during the run.

It's nothing new to find automotive companies working around test parameters.
I've heard of very similar techniques being used recently in the car industry too.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
Cyder said:
I've heard of very similar techniques being used recently in the car industry too.
It must be pretty easy to do, especially for the silly EU economy test - it's so far removed from how anyone would drive that you could program a special mode and nobody would ever notice.

Starfighter

4,923 posts

178 months

Friday 18th September 2015
quotequote all
The "Big 3" have had a bit of a downer on imported diesels for a few years already. The emissions regulations were effectively written by Detroit tomake it very hard for a diesel to pass any of the tests. Net results was that a VAG 4 pot TDI doing 50mpg was branded a dirty yet a big V8 petrol doing 10mpg (on a good day) was classed as clean.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Saturday 19th September 2015
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
The "Big 3" have had a bit of a downer on imported diesels for a few years already. The emissions regulations were effectively written by Detroit tomake it very hard for a diesel to pass any of the tests. Net results was that a VAG 4 pot TDI doing 50mpg was branded a dirty yet a big V8 petrol doing 10mpg (on a good day) was classed as clean.
You say that like its a bad thing.


Plus you do know diesel emissions are dangerous yes?

Oilchange

8,442 posts

260 months

Saturday 19th September 2015
quotequote all
i am sure it's possible to contact a car using mobile or wifi technology and change maps remotely...

Huff

3,141 posts

191 months

Saturday 19th September 2015
quotequote all
Oh for a Rohrl-ing Köhl meme...

King Herald

23,501 posts

216 months

Saturday 19th September 2015
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
The thing about the USA they have the balls to stand up to companies. i dirve a diesel but they are not good cars for the health of others. The right thing is to tax deisel more and bring petrol prices down, to ensure better emissions. Labour where the ones who gave diesel a tax break and ended up how we are now in the uk.

The USA rightly are not a fan of diesel.
All governments EVER do to stop pollution/global warming/climate change etc is add tax to everything........

Where I live diesel is cheaper, and we pay about 40p a litre for it. Petrol is about 50p. biggrin

nyt

1,807 posts

150 months

Saturday 19th September 2015
quotequote all
Don't VW group have previous on this sort of thing: http://www.r8talk.com/forums/5-general-discussion/...

[Audi R8 has a programmed flatspot to help with emissions]

TBH, I thought that all manufacturers did it.

Of course the US case is more devious. As I understand it the car detects the test situation and behaves differently.


98elise

26,474 posts

161 months

Saturday 19th September 2015
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Starfighter said:
The "Big 3" have had a bit of a downer on imported diesels for a few years already. The emissions regulations were effectively written by Detroit tomake it very hard for a diesel to pass any of the tests. Net results was that a VAG 4 pot TDI doing 50mpg was branded a dirty yet a big V8 petrol doing 10mpg (on a good day) was classed as clean.
You say that like its a bad thing.


Plus you do know diesel emissions are dangerous yes?
And petrol emissions are good for you?