Discussion
Hoofy said:
Halb said:
On the Sunday show now.
Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
Which is down to people eating too much.Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
jjlynn27 said:
Hoofy said:
Halb said:
On the Sunday show now.
Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
Which is down to people eating too much.Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
rover 623gsi said:
jjlynn27 said:
Hoofy said:
Halb said:
On the Sunday show now.
Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
Which is down to people eating too much.Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
One thing I love it food, and I've noticed I taste far more when I am stationary/sat and have the sensory time/blood flow to enjoy it a lot more.
jjlynn27 said:
Hoofy said:
Halb said:
On the Sunday show now.
Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
Which is down to people eating too much.Million pounds an hour spent in tackling diabetes type 2.
Hoofy said:
Halb said:
Hoofy said:
Which is down to people eating too much.
Well that's sorted now, you've fixed it.Halb said:
Hoofy said:
Halb said:
Hoofy said:
Which is down to people eating too much.
Well that's sorted now, you've fixed it.Quick update seems fitting
The ONS has announced today that the soft drinks industry levy raised £13m for the government in April 2018, the first month the tax was in force
https://twitter.com/ONS/status/998876157771763712
The ONS has announced today that the soft drinks industry levy raised £13m for the government in April 2018, the first month the tax was in force
https://twitter.com/ONS/status/998876157771763712
Sales figures would make interesting reading.
The sugar tax isn't that high really but some brands that shall remain nameless took this as an excuse to shrink pack sizes by 25% while also bumping their prices by 23% and then on top did exactly the same thing with their sugar free products to maintain price parity. So (for one example pack) 73p of new tax triggered the equivalent of a £4 price rise.
Looking at the way their shelf space and prominence has changed I suspect they got too greedy, sales collapsed and the sales team have fked themselves.
The loss of sales and related revenue will dwarf the new tax take. Especially if it's only generated £13m when it was predicted to generate at least £40m per month.
Utter cock up just like everything Jamie Oliver is associated with.
The sugar tax isn't that high really but some brands that shall remain nameless took this as an excuse to shrink pack sizes by 25% while also bumping their prices by 23% and then on top did exactly the same thing with their sugar free products to maintain price parity. So (for one example pack) 73p of new tax triggered the equivalent of a £4 price rise.
Looking at the way their shelf space and prominence has changed I suspect they got too greedy, sales collapsed and the sales team have fked themselves.
The loss of sales and related revenue will dwarf the new tax take. Especially if it's only generated £13m when it was predicted to generate at least £40m per month.
Utter cock up just like everything Jamie Oliver is associated with.
Edited by Jonesy23 on Tuesday 22 May 12:55
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff