Oil: how low can it go?

Author
Discussion

GT03ROB

13,262 posts

221 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
According to this some of it is now worthless....or at least you have to pay somebody to take it...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-18/...

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
Axionknight said:
All good fun innit? I like the subsea business, plenty of time to move around though (aged 27), smile Never been offshore though, but I'd love to see it one day.
By 27 I was sick of offshore! Noob!

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
bucksmanuk said:
...700 bar of hydrogen...
Dont be such a pussy. What could possibly go wrong? wink

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
jshell said:
Axionknight said:
All good fun innit? I like the subsea business, plenty of time to move around though (aged 27), smile Never been offshore though, but I'd love to see it one day.
By 27 I was sick of offshore! Noob!
No need to go, I earn and learn plenty on dry land - I made a life of working away when I was in my early twenties and single and it was st then. So I'd never do it now unless it was that or the brew.

e8_pack

1,384 posts

181 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
bucksmanuk said:
Captain Benzo said:
Axionknight said:
As reserves are extracted from deeper places though, a point may come where extraction costs ramp up or become unviable.

We're qualifying valves to 10,000psi working pressure and 350f/-20f at the moment and hyperbaric testing them to over 3000m depths. So design, production and qualification costs are pretty massive so that may mean some fields remains unviable/too costly to harness for quite some time.
in a similar boat. wellheads are looking at 20,000psi, -50C to 150C and 3,000m depth. really hostile environments.

while the price is low, these qualifications are taking a back seat. wait and see i guess.
Same story here, currently testing valves at 1000 bar - as I write in fact! - (15,000 psi as near as dammit), 1250 bar currently going through analysis, 1500 bar in initial design, and 2000 bar being requested. Makes you wonder where we'll stop....
Just need the oil price to go up and then someone will write out some capex’s and start buying them...
Also doing valves for 700 bar of hydrogen – ooo-er! eek
You're testing at 15k? That will be 10k WP then.

Already 20k trees on the table, was building 15k years ago for GoM. Auto Frettage test pressure was 22.5k. We did that in a water tank despite being hydro.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Monday 18th January 2016
quotequote all
Our valve assemblies are at 10,000psi during the PR2s and full 17D/6A qualifications so yes that's a 15,000psi proof test. We have done some 15,000psi working pressure (22,500psi proof test) hangers and such forth, though - some of them years ago, before I started.

smile

el romeral

1,052 posts

137 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Another one looking over his shoulder here. I'm a contractor offshore for BP Norway, just hoping to avoid the axe and for an upturn in oil prices. Our field has had massive redevelopment in recent years with large cost overuns and in addition, we are part way through a multi billion NOK 30 well P&A program. Hate to think what our break even barrel price is?

AJS-

15,366 posts

236 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
Logically wouldn't you expect the low prices to exist as long as the storage glut continues? If there's 3 months in storage at present it's going to be hard to sell more. In the typically efficient way these things work I guess lots of projects will be pulled and wells mothballed until there is under supply and the storage is run down. Then the price will rise again.

So I guess the question is how long these things will take to work through the system. The best indicator of that would seem to be when stores start running down. With the caveat that speculation will probably overshoot, as usual giving a couple of false starts, before the oil companies start investing in new projects again.

What did I miss?

RYH64E

7,960 posts

244 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
AJS- said:
Logically wouldn't you expect the low prices to exist as long as the storage glut continues? If there's 3 months in storage at present it's going to be hard to sell more. In the typically efficient way these things work I guess lots of projects will be pulled and wells mothballed until there is under supply and the storage is run down. Then the price will rise again.

So I guess the question is how long these things will take to work through the system. The best indicator of that would seem to be when stores start running down. With the caveat that speculation will probably overshoot, as usual giving a couple of false starts, before the oil companies start investing in new projects again.

What did I miss?
It's not like selling ice cream, where you can park the van up over the winter and start again in the summer, you can't just mothball an offshore platform and start up again in a few years time as if nothing had happened.

Stocks won't begun to run down until demand exceeds supply, and with Iran returning to production supply looks like increasing rather than decreasing. The countries who could cut supply don't want to, the oversupply is a deliberate tactic not a mistake.

High cost producers are going to have some very difficult choices to make, and soon I suspect.

wibble cb

3,605 posts

207 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
just passed a petrol station....87.9cents (cad) a litre......that 44 pence !!

NRS

22,163 posts

201 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
RYH64E said:
AJS- said:
Logically wouldn't you expect the low prices to exist as long as the storage glut continues? If there's 3 months in storage at present it's going to be hard to sell more. In the typically efficient way these things work I guess lots of projects will be pulled and wells mothballed until there is under supply and the storage is run down. Then the price will rise again.

So I guess the question is how long these things will take to work through the system. The best indicator of that would seem to be when stores start running down. With the caveat that speculation will probably overshoot, as usual giving a couple of false starts, before the oil companies start investing in new projects again.

What did I miss?
It's not like selling ice cream, where you can park the van up over the winter and start again in the summer, you can't just mothball an offshore platform and start up again in a few years time as if nothing had happened.

Stocks won't begun to run down until demand exceeds supply, and with Iran returning to production supply looks like increasing rather than decreasing. The countries who could cut supply don't want to, the oversupply is a deliberate tactic not a mistake.

High cost producers are going to have some very difficult choices to make, and soon I suspect.
Generally a offshore discovery might take between 7-15 years to move to production depending on infrastructure available (political, financial as well as equipment and pipelines). So that side of things will take a lot longer to be seen. Companies will pull projects that do not have too much cash invested in them yet. Thus we will still be having field development projects coming in for a few years since they are too late to postpone. However costs will be saved more quickly by cancelling infill wells due to be drilled during these times, plus postponing maintenance and so on. Onshore stuff is quicker to react, but depending on what type of field it is these are much cheaper and so may not need to be cancelled during these times. That's what we see with production coming from Iran etc.

Also in regards to the efficiency question of projects being postponed and so on. Companies know it will cost them in the long run- The problem is cashflow. They can't just keep investing in projects when their future income is so much lower than they expected based on the old oil price. As an industry billions of pounds are lost per day compared to the old oil price, so they have a lot less cash to spend (or they have to increase their debt).

sooperscoop

408 posts

163 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
jshell said:
By 27 I was sick of offshore! Noob!
1st helicopter ride: "OMG, I'm a helicopter! it's taking off! OMG"
2nd helicopter ride: "This is a noisy, vibrating pain in the dick."

Worst ever: 6 hour boomerang in the Arctic. 3h out - fog - 3h back. In an insulated survival suit. F**k my life.

sooperscoop

408 posts

163 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
NRS said:
Also in regards to the efficiency question of projects being postponed and so on. Companies know it will cost them in the long run- The problem is cashflow. They can't just keep investing in projects when their future income is so much lower than they expected based on the old oil price. As an industry billions of pounds are lost per day compared to the old oil price, so they have a lot less cash to spend (or they have to increase their debt).
Some big FIDs due this year, including a whole bunch of FLNGs. It'll be interesting, for sure.

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
..and Shell announce 10,000 job cuts if the BG merger goes ahead! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35359219http://www.ft.com/fastft/2016/01/20/10000-jobs-to-...

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
sooperscoop said:
jshell said:
By 27 I was sick of offshore! Noob!
1st helicopter ride: "OMG, I'm a helicopter! it's taking off! OMG"
2nd helicopter ride: "This is a noisy, vibrating pain in the dick."

Worst ever: 6 hour boomerang in the Arctic. 3h out - fog - 3h back. In an insulated survival suit. F**k my life.
Worst for me was a 3hr by Chinook the year before the big crash off Shetland. Flying through a lightning storm off Nigeria was a 'puckering' moment too, tho'.

Frio3535

595 posts

135 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
jshell said:
..and Shell announce 10,000 job cuts if the BG merger goes ahead! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35359219http://www.ft.com/fastft/2016/01/20/10000-jobs-to-...
Not entirely price related as job cuts would happen anyway where there are inefficiencies in the workforce structure, probably not 10,000 mind. Wouldn't want to be working at BG HQ right now.


Edited by Frio3535 on Wednesday 20th January 11:34

dom9

8,078 posts

209 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
sooperscoop said:
Some big FIDs due this year, including a whole bunch of FLNGs. It'll be interesting, for sure.
The Coral and Fortuna decisions will likely decide my fate...

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
Frio3535 said:
jshell said:
..and Shell announce 10,000 job cuts if the BG merger goes ahead! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35359219http://www.ft.com/fastft/2016/01/20/10000-jobs-to-...
Not entirely price related as job cuts would happen anyway where there are inefficiencies in the workforce structure, probably not 10,000 mind. Wouldn't want to be working at BG HQ right now.
Rumour is that Shell will take the losses, not BG...

Borghetto

3,274 posts

183 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
wibble cb said:
just passed a petrol station....87.9cents (cad) a litre......that 44 pence !!
I think you mean £0.61p per litre.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
Borghetto said:
wibble cb said:
just passed a petrol station....87.9cents (cad) a litre......that 44 pence !!
I think you mean £0.61p per litre.
Why? 88 cents Canadian is about 43/44 pence.