Tony Martin held in relation to illegal firearms possession

Tony Martin held in relation to illegal firearms possession

Author
Discussion

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

124 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
mail said:
Today's arrest came after the bachelor farmer claimed he still kept illegal weapons to a reporter - although he refused to say how many.

Mr Martin was commenting on the shooting at an Essex care home where pensioner Rita King, 81, was allegedly killed by her husband, in which he claimed that 'Britain was awash with illegally held firearms.'

He then said that he too kept a weapon, or weapons, but joked to the reporter, 'You'll have to find out, won't you...'

Mr Martin insisted that police were in denial of the scale of illegally held guns in Britain and dismissed his own local force, Norfolk Constabulary as 'a bunch of half wits.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3380265/Fa...
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Greendubber

13,226 posts

204 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Willhire89 said:
Of course ....

cop It still takes a firearms command structure, firearms teams and search teams to.....




...arrest a 71 y/old man in a local town. laugh



Laugh all you want, it still needs to be done!

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
BlackLabel said:
mail said:
Today's arrest came after the bachelor farmer claimed he still kept illegal weapons to a reporter - although he refused to say how many.

Mr Martin was commenting on the shooting at an Essex care home where pensioner Rita King, 81, was allegedly killed by her husband, in which he claimed that 'Britain was awash with illegally held firearms.'

He then said that he too kept a weapon, or weapons, but joked to the reporter, 'You'll have to find out, won't you...'

Mr Martin insisted that police were in denial of the scale of illegally held guns in Britain and dismissed his own local force, Norfolk Constabulary as 'a bunch of half wits.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3380265/Fa...
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
FFS, really?

Just how more pathetic can this get?

Tango13

8,456 posts

177 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Willhire89 said:
Greendubber said:
Willhire89 said:
Of course that wasn't what you said .....you intimated it needed the infrastructure to make the arrest.

Be interesting to see if they find nothing and when he said he had another weapon in his interview he was bullstting.

Maybe you could handle that press interview?
Incorrect as they still require the same resources for the arrest regardless of where it took place.
Of course ....

cop It still takes a firearms command structure, firearms teams and search teams to.....




...arrest a 71 y/old man in a local town. laugh



There was a case a few years back where a PC went with a planning officer to provide a bit of legal back up for the eviction of some old duffer from his illegally built dwelling prior to it's demolition.

The old duffer shot the planning officer dead and wounded the PC with an illegally held firearm.

Still think the police were over reacting when dealing with a 71 y/o man?



Willhire89

1,329 posts

206 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
Willhire89 said:
Of course ....

cop It still takes a firearms command structure, firearms teams and search teams to.....




...arrest a 71 y/old man in a local town. laugh



Laugh all you want, it still needs to be done!

scenario8

Original Poster:

6,574 posts

180 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
FFS, really?

Just how more pathetic can this get?
What do you mean? Pathetic that the authorities took action you mean? Or pathetic from your perspective that the action required so much resource? Or pathetic that the idiot made the boasts?

Willhire89

1,329 posts

206 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Tango13 said:
There was a case a few years back where a PC went with a planning officer to provide a bit of legal back up for the eviction of some old duffer from his illegally built dwelling prior to it's demolition.

The old duffer shot the planning officer dead and wounded the PC with an illegally held firearm.

Still think the police were over reacting when dealing with a 71 y/o man?
Albert Dryden - that was 1991 when he had made specific threats beforehand

So - yes

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
Scuffers said:
FFS, really?

Just how more pathetic can this get?
What do you mean? Pathetic that the authorities took action you mean? Or pathetic from your perspective that the action required so much resource? Or pathetic that the idiot made the boasts?
Pathetic in that the police seem to be allowing the press to dictate their actions.

scenario8

Original Poster:

6,574 posts

180 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
scenario8 said:
Scuffers said:
FFS, really?

Just how more pathetic can this get?
What do you mean? Pathetic that the authorities took action you mean? Or pathetic from your perspective that the action required so much resource? Or pathetic that the idiot made the boasts?
Pathetic in that the police seem to be allowing the press to dictate their actions.
The authorities appear to be reacting to the individual making statements about the illegal ownership of firearms. Statements made in the press. How is that a case of the Police being dictated to by the press? I don't understand what you mean. Should there be no reaction?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
The authorities appear to be reacting to the individual making statements about the illegal ownership of firearms. Statements made in the press. How is that a case of the Police being dictated to by the press? I don't understand what you mean. Should there be no reaction?
So, just what will be said when no firearms are discovered?

Arrest him for wasting police time?

scenario8

Original Poster:

6,574 posts

180 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
So, just what will be said when no firearms are discovered?

Arrest him for wasting police time?
What will you say when (sic) illegally held firearms are found?

(in answer to your question - I'd fully support your suggestion!)

I remain intrigued, though. If a notorious man such as he, a man convicted of murder by shooting (later reduced to manslaughter on appeal) boasts he holds illegal firearms do you think NFA is the appropriate response? I'd want it taken seriously... I certainly don't think the reaction of the Police is pathetic. Tony Martin mouthing off is pathetic.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
I bet he's laughing his cock off.

And i can appreciate why.

(Also, i find it amusing you call him notorious)


eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
Scuffers said:
So, just what will be said when no firearms are discovered?

Arrest him for wasting police time?
What will you say when (sic) illegally held firearms are found?

(in answer to your question - I'd fully support your suggestion!)

I remain intrigued, though. If a notorious man such as he, a man convicted of murder by shooting (later reduced to manslaughter on appeal) boasts he holds illegal firearms do you think NFA is the appropriate response? I'd want it taken seriously... I certainly don't think the reaction of the Police is pathetic. Tony Martin mouthing off is pathetic.
Can't see why Martin 'mouthing off' is pathetic. The press went to him for an opinion, and he gave it.

scenario8

Original Poster:

6,574 posts

180 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
eccles said:
Can't see why Martin 'mouthing off' is pathetic. The press went to him for an opinion, and he gave it.
I'm not particularly interested in his opinions (of the recent murder). He can possess those as much as he wants. He can tell all and sundry. I think his decision to follow up any opinion by boasting to the press he possesses firearms is the pathetic bit. If you really must possess illegal firearms I would have thought the daftest thing you might do would be to tell the press!

birdcage

2,840 posts

206 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
He's a piece of st killer, hope he goes away for a very long time for the good of public safety.
You share the same christian name as his 'victim', is that homage to a wonderful chap who wanted someone else's property and got what he deserved?

Albeit with a pump action which was a bit heavy but don't kick fresh dogst on a hot day wobble

stuartmmcfc

8,664 posts

193 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
(Also, i find it amusing you call him notorious)
Surely that is exactly what he is?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all

He probably did it knowing the police would go off on one, thus making them look stupid.

Greendubber

13,226 posts

204 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
He probably did it knowing the police would go off on one, thus making them look stupid.
I dont think making sure someone hasnt got a illegal firearm makes them look stupid.

AJL308

6,390 posts

157 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
[b]

as another poster suggested i suspect that this is down to the fact following his revious conviction he isn;t going to be allowed a SGC never mind an S.1 cert ...[/b]

He is a prohibited person under section 21 of the Firearms Act 1968 by virtue of his existing conviction. This includes possession of all firearms, including air guns, and ammunition for life, and as of recently, all antique firearms as well.

eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Thursday 31st December 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
He probably did it knowing the police would go off on one, thus making them look stupid.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't!